Re: The Conservation Nazis

From: Gluteus Maximus (legion_at_ceaserus.com)
Date: 08/28/04 

Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 21:31:58 +0100

On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 19:54:15 +0100, Professor Ludwig
<conservation@berlin-fin.de> wrote:

>http://www.con-servation.org.uk/
>
>The Conservation Nazis
>
>UK conservationists have been slated in a wildlife magazine as
>“fascist” and don’t like to be compared with Germany’s Third Reich.
>However, their treatment of wildlife of certain origin or abundance
>has startling and perturbing similarities.
>
>They have adopted similar principles against wildlife as Hitler and
>his Nazi thugs had against humans.
>
>German Nazis wanted rid of the Jews they perceived as damaging the
>habitat of the chosen Aryans.
>
>Conservation Nazis want rid of wildlife they perceive as damaging the
>habitat of their chosen flora and fauna.
>
>
>German Nazis killed humans to protect the Aryans' habitat.
>
>Conservation Nazis kill wildlife to protect the habitat of those they
>favour.
>
>
>German Nazis were obsessed with national identity and heritage
>
>Conservation Nazis are obsessed with national identity and heritage
>
>
>German Nazis referred to their reign of a thousand years.
>
>Conservation Nazis refer to their preferred species of a thousand
>years.
>
>
>German Nazis were obsessed by genetic purity.
>
>Conservation Nazis are obsessed with genetic purity.
>
>
>German Nazis forbade mixed marriages.
>
>Conservation Nazis kill hybrids.
>
>
>German Nazis had the support of scientists.
>
>Conservation Nazis have the support of scientists.
>
>
>German Nazis shot Jews to reduce their numbers.
>
>Conservation Nazis shoot wildlife to reduce their numbers.
>
>
>German Nazis gassed Jews.
>
>Conservation Nazis gas wildlife.
>
>
>German Nazis had a “final solution”.
>
>Conservation Nazis have a final solution.
>
>
>German Nazis were convinced they were right.
>
>Conservation Nazis are convinced they are right.
>
>
>German Nazis had millions of supporters.
>
>Conservation Nazis have millions of supporters.
>
>
>German Nazis used propaganda.
>
>Conservation Nazis use propaganda.
>
>
>German Nazis used ridicule, lies and psychology against their
>opponents.
>
>Conservation Nazis use ridicule, lies and psychology against their
>opponents.
>
>
>German Nazis had the support of the law.
>
>Conservation Nazis have the support of the law.
>
>
>German Nazis were financed by the state
>
>Conservation Nazis are financed by the state.
>
>
>German Nazis did not consider the welfare of the individual.
>
>Conservation Nazis do not consider the welfare of the individual.
>
>
>German Nazis feigned respectability.
>
>Conservation Nazis feign respectability.
>
>
>German Nazis had no respect for the life of individual members of the
>species.
>
>Conservation Nazis have no respect for the life of individual members
>of species.
>
>
>German Nazis reaped their just deserve.
>
>Conservation Nazis have yet to reap theirs.
>

Soieg heil

**********************************************

'You can't win 'em all.'
Lord Haw Haw.

Newsgroup ettiquette

1) Tell everyone the Trolls don't bother you.
2) Say you've killfiled them, yet continue to respond.
3) Tell other people off who repsond despite doing so yourself.
4) Continually talk about Trolls while maintaining
    they're having no effect.
5) Publicly post killfile rules so the Trolls know
    how to avoid them.
6) Make lame legal threats and other barrel scraping
    manoeuvres when your abuse reports are ignored.
7) Eat vast quantities of pies.
8) Forget to brush your teeth for several decades.
9) Help a demon.local poster with their email while
    secretly reading it.
10) Pretend you're a hard *** when in fact you're
    as bent as a roundabout.
11) Become the laughing stock of Usenet like Mabbet
12) Die of old age
13) Keep paying Dr Chartham his fees and hope one day you
    will have a penis the girls can see.

---------------------------------------
BE WARNED YOU PHUCKERS. I WILL BAR BQ YOUR ASS.

We have received an allegation that you have posted an article/s to
newsgroups demon.local,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals,
uk.environment.conservation,uk.rec.birdwatching,scot.birds,uk.rec.gardening,
uk.business.agriculture,uk.rec.fishing.coarse,sci.agriculture.poultry
[<kmfdljArhNO5EwYq@4AX.com and others>] which our external solicitors
believe to bear a defamatory meaning and as such we have had to remove
the article from our servers.

The part in question is the comment "Pete is a fraud, a liar and
a cheat." as well as some other comments in your article.

We cannot and do not make any judgement as to whether such material is
defensible. However, the state of the law at the moment means that if
we are put on notice that defamatory material is being published through
our systems, Thus plc may be liable for damages, along with you, if it
does not take action to prevent that material being published. Those
damages could be substantial and we could both incur heavy legal
expenses.

In addition, the current state of the law could leave Thus plc
liable if it failed to take action and you disseminated any further
material through our systems which was later found to be defamatory.

While we do not necessarily agree with the current legal position we
must accept it, and have therefore removed the posting in question.

Please reply to this email acknowledging that you understand the problem
and that you will not, in future, publish further material which
could be considered defamatory of Pete through Demon's systems.

We attach below a suggested form of acknowledgement for your
convenience.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT

I acknowledge receipt of your email and confirm that I understand your
explanation of the legal situation regarding material which is
considered defamatory.

I confirm that I will not publish such material in future using my Demon
service, and will not publish further material which could be considered
defamatory of Pete.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Demon Legal Team.