Re: This fox thing.
From: Jill (alpha.hitch_at_virgin.net)
Date: 09/19/04
- Next message: Philip Hart: "Re: Grey Squirrels:"
- Previous message: Martin Willett: "Re: Yesterday we received the great news that the Hunting Bill will be reintroduced to the Commons next week."
- In reply to: Pat Bryant: "Re: This fox thing."
- Next in thread: Buttercup the moo cow: "Re: This fox thing."
- Reply: Buttercup the moo cow: "Re: This fox thing."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 09:39:20 +0100
On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 23:55:58 +0000 (UTC),Some hooker we all know as
"Pat Bryant" <patricia.bryant@btconnect.com> honked and wrote:
>
>"Nick Maclaren" <nmm1@cuss.cam.ac.dc> wrote in message
>news:f4rok0h5ogvkdq5q955ub7c28csst8gshi@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 15:09:24 +0100, Howard Neil
>> <hneil@REMOVETOREPLY.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> >Jim Webster wrote:
>> >
>> >> As an aside I was in our agricultural engineers this morning. This area
>> >> doesn't have hunting, (the terrain is wrong) we shoot foxes and most
>people
>> >> who shoot work in town in the yard, but someone from the Countryside
>> >> Alliance came in and asked if it was all right to leave a poster. There
>was
>> >> no hesitation, the posters were put up in pride of place and in a busy
>shop
>> >> (with a lot of people out of town buying bits for lawn mowers,
>strimmers
>> >> etc) there was general appreciation
>> >
>> >I have just returned from helping a neighbour who had a cow with a
>> >prolapsed uterus. As work progressed, the conversation turned quickly to
>> >this issue.
>> >
>> >The vet said that feelings locally are running rather high. It seems
>> >that the issue (in people's minds) has widened to town versus
>> >countryside. They are particularly concerned that this is happening at a
>> >time when town folk expect greater access to the countryside. The
>> >consensus of opinion is that this could escalate to a form of civil war
>> >and there is much talk of civil disobedience.
>> >
>> >I am pleased that I am now retired. This issue has the appearance of
>> >being larger (and more violent) than any issue I have seen before
>> >(including the Poll Tax).
>>
>> No it wont. Whilst the pro hunt goons are very vocal, they are a very
>> small minority. They will be beaten into submission and like it or
>> they will disappear into the penal system. If they have a few martyrs
>> big deal they'll get over it.
>
>You reckon? The CA put 407,000 on the streets.
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.
> What is the largest number
>the antis have ever put together 50?
They don't need to. If I recall they only needed 300+MPs to kick you
perverts into touch. Here's the proof should you want it.
On Clause 6, which was on the issue of using dog's underground.
On Clause 11, which forbids the registration of fox hunts - banning
fox hunting.
On Clause 14, which forbids the registration of mink hunts - banning
mink hunting.
Finally, on the motion that the bill should be returned to the
standing committee for 'tidying up'.
How they voted
The results from the four votes:
Clause 6: Ayes: 165 Noes: 373 Majority: 208
(Click here for 'How did my MP vote?')
Clause 11: Ayes: 362 Noes: 154 Majority: 208
(Click here for 'How did my MP vote?')
Clause 14: Ayes: 341 Noes: 160 Majority: 181
(Click here for 'How did my MP vote?')
The Hunting Bill be recommitted to the standing committee on addition
of Clause 11: Ayes have it
NOTE: Ayes have it. LOL
Stick that up your chuffer. Lets not forget we also banned mink
hunting ......lol
You could always go drag hunting, shouldn't have any trouble finding a
fairy to dress up from your lot?
>
>The antis even had to go the US for the million quid they gave to His
>tonyness - the CA can raise more than that here in a month.
>
>Pat
-- ********************************************** 'You can't win 'em all.' Lord Haw Haw. Since I stopped donating money to CONservation hooligan charities Like the RSPB, Woodland Trust and all the other fat cat charities I am in the top 0.217% richest people in the world. There are 5,986,950,449 people poorer than me If you're really interested I am the 13,049,551 richest person in the world. And I'm keeping the bloody lot. So sue me. http://www.globalrichlist.com/ Newsgroup ettiquette 1) Tell everyone the Trolls don't bother you. 2) Say you've killfiled them, yet continue to respond. 3) Tell other people off who repsond despite doing so yourself. 4) Continually talk about Trolls while maintaining they're having no effect. 5) Publicly post killfile rules so the Trolls know how to avoid them. 6) Make lame legal threats and other barrel scraping manoeuvres when your abuse reports are ignored. 7) Eat vast quantities of pies. 8) Forget to brush your teeth for several decades. 9) Help a demon.local poster with their email while secretly reading it. 10) Pretend you're a hard *** when in fact you're as bent as a roundabout. 11) Become the laughing stock of Usenet like Mabbet 12) Die of old age 13) Keep paying Dr Chartham his fees and hope one day you will have a penis the girls can see. --------------------------------------- "If you would'nt talk to them in a bar, don't *uckin' vote for them" "Australia was not *discovered* it was invaded" The Big Yin. Need a fake diploma for fun? contact my collegues Malcolm Ogilvie or Michael Saunby who both bought one and got one free, only $15 each, have as many as you like www.fakediplomas.com
- Next message: Philip Hart: "Re: Grey Squirrels:"
- Previous message: Martin Willett: "Re: Yesterday we received the great news that the Hunting Bill will be reintroduced to the Commons next week."
- In reply to: Pat Bryant: "Re: This fox thing."
- Next in thread: Buttercup the moo cow: "Re: This fox thing."
- Reply: Buttercup the moo cow: "Re: This fox thing."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]