Re: I liked it.. !

From: Ray (ray_at_syntex.com)
Date: 09/21/04 

Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 18:01:25 +0000 (UTC)

"Nick Maclaren" <nmm1@cus.cam.ac.dc> wrote in message
news:4ufuk0d0pcd2t0b3mfnm44l32l2jctl2it@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 20:19:40 +0100, Keith <keith@nospam.demon.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
> >A colleague, having taken delivery of his new Porsche Boxster, decided
> >to out for a nice evening drive. Top was down, the breeze blowing
> >through what was left of his hair and he decided to open her up.
> >
> >As the needle jumped up to 120 kph he suddenly saw flashing red and blue
> >lights in his rear mirror. "There's no way they'll catch a Boxster" he
> >thought to himself and opened her up further.
> >
> >The needle hit 130, 140, 150, 160... until the reality of the situation
> >hit him. "What the hell am I doing?" he thought, and pulled over.
> >
> >The cop came up to him, took his license without a word and examined it
> >and the car. "It's been a long day, this is the end of my shift and it's
> >Friday the 13th" he said. "I don't feel like more paperwork, so if you
> >can give me an excuse for your driving which I haven't heard before, you
> >can go".
> >
> >My chum thought for a moment and says "Last week my wife ran off with a
> >copper. I was afraid you were trying to give her back."
> >
> >"Have a nice weekend" says the Officer.
>
>
> Ha ha. This poast was so good I have decided to escalate it tenfold.
> Well done that man.

LOL.

One I've just pinched from another NG.

 A woman walked into the kitchen to find her husband stalking
> around with a fly swatter.
> "What are you doing?" She asked.
> "Hunting Flies" He responded.
> "Oh. Killing any?" She asked.
> "Yep, 3 males, 2 Females," he replied.
> Intrigued, she asked. "How can you tell them apart?"
> He responded, "3 were on a beer can, 2 were on the phone."

> --
> *******************
> *You can't win 'em all.*
> Lord Haw Haw.
>
>
> Newsgroup ettiquette
> 1) Tell everyone the Trolls don't bother you.
> 2) Say you've killfiled them, yet continue to respond.
> 3) Tell other people off who repsond despite doing so yourself.
> 4) Continually talk about Trolls while maintaining
> they're having no effect.
> 5) Publicly post killfile rules so the Trolls know
> how to avoid them.
> 6) Make lame legal threats and other barrel scraping
> manoeuvres when your abuse reports are ignored.
> 7) Eat vast quantities of pies.
> 8) Forget to brush your teeth for several decades.
> 9) Help a demon.local poster with their email while
> secretly reading it.
> 10) Pretend you're a hard *** when in fact you're
> as bent as a roundabout.
> 11) Become the laughing stock of Usenet like Mabbet
> 12) Die of old age
> 13) Keep paying Dr Chartham his fees and hope one day you
> will have a penis the girls can see.
>
> We have received an allegation that you have posted an article/s to
> newsgroups
demon.local,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals,
>
uk.environment.conservation,uk.rec.birdwatching,scot.birds,uk.rec.gardening,
> uk.business.agriculture,uk.rec.fishing.coarse,sci.agriculture.poultry
> [<kmfdljArhNO5EwYq@4AX.com and others>] which our external solicitors
> believe to bear a defamatory meaning and as such we have had to remove
> the article from our servers.
>
> The part in question is the comment "Pete is a fraud, a liar and
> a cheat." as well as some other comments in your article.
>
> We cannot and do not make any judgement as to whether such material is
> defensible. However, the state of the law at the moment means that if
> we are put on notice that defamatory material is being published through
> our systems, Thus plc may be liable for damages, along with you, if it
> does not take action to prevent that material being published. Those
> damages could be substantial and we could both incur heavy legal
> expenses.
>
> In addition, the current state of the law could leave Thus plc
> liable if it failed to take action and you disseminated any further
> material through our systems which was later found to be defamatory.
>
> While we do not necessarily agree with the current legal position we
> must accept it, and have therefore removed the posting in question.
>
> Please reply to this email acknowledging that you understand the problem
> and that you will not, in future, publish further material which
> could be considered defamatory of Pete through Demon's systems.
>
> We attach below a suggested form of acknowledgement for your
> convenience.
>
> ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT
>
> I acknowledge receipt of your email and confirm that I understand your
> explanation of the legal situation regarding material which is
> considered defamatory.
>
> I confirm that I will not publish such material in future using my Demon
> service, and will not publish further material which could be considered
> defamatory of Pete.
>
> I look forward to hearing from you.
> Demon Legal Team.
>
> FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
> which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
> owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
> understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
> democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
> that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
> provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with
Title
> 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
> profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included
> information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
> subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more
information
> go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.

Quantcast