Re: Another Boy Shot By "Lampers" The DANGERS of letting perverts run with firearms.
From: Nick Maclaren (nmm1_at_cus.cam.ac.dc)
Date: 09/25/04
- Next message: Nick Maclaren: "Re: Another Boy Shot By "Lampers" The DANGERS of letting perverts run with firearms."
- Previous message: Nick Maclaren: "Re: Another Boy Shot By "Lampers" The DANGERS of letting perverts run with firearms."
- Maybe in reply to: Derek Moody: "Re: Another Boy Shot By "Lampers" The DANGERS of letting perverts run with firearms."
- Next in thread: Thargoid: "Re: Another Boy Shot By "Lampers" The DANGERS of letting perverts run with firearms."
- Reply: Thargoid: "Re: Another Boy Shot By "Lampers" The DANGERS of letting perverts run with firearms."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 19:56:56 +0100
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 17:24:07 +0100, "Jim Webster"
<Jim@zerospam.moik.net> wrote:
>
>"John Cartmell" <john@cartmell.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:4cf40893e0john@cartmell.demon.co.uk...
>> In article <ant251454d07BxcK@half-baked-idea.co.uk>, Derek Moody
>> <derek@farm-direct.co.uk> wrote:
>> > Now you see one reason why hunters are preferred to lampers where foxes
>> > must be controlled.
>>
>> > But Pete and all those in favour of the current hunting with hounds bill
>> > propose that we replace hunting with lamping.
>>
>> There are plenty of people with sense backing the bill
>
>
>funny how so few of them have crossposted to uba.
Hilarious when you consider so few have got the ban even....
Never mind dim jim, you fiddle while your world falls about you, just
make sure you don't get caught.
--
*******************
*You can't win 'em all.*
Lord Haw Haw.
Newsgroup ettiquette
1) Tell everyone the Trolls don't bother you.
2) Say you've killfiled them, yet continue to respond.
3) Tell other people off who repsond despite doing so yourself.
4) Continually talk about Trolls while maintaining
they're having no effect.
5) Publicly post killfile rules so the Trolls know
how to avoid them.
6) Make lame legal threats and other barrel scraping
manoeuvres when your abuse reports are ignored.
7) Eat vast quantities of pies.
8) Forget to brush your teeth for several decades.
9) Help a demon.local poster with their email while
secretly reading it.
10) Pretend you're a hard *** when in fact you're
as bent as a roundabout.
11) Become the laughing stock of Usenet like Mabbet
12) Die of old age
13) Keep paying Dr Chartham his fees and hope one day you
will have a penis the girls can see.
We have received an allegation that you have posted an article/s to
newsgroups demon.local,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals,
uk.environment.conservation,uk.rec.birdwatching,scot.birds,uk.rec.gardening,
uk.business.agriculture,uk.rec.fishing.coarse,sci.agriculture.poultry
[<kmfdljArhNO5EwYq@4AX.com and others>] which our external solicitors
believe to bear a defamatory meaning and as such we have had to remove
the article from our servers.
The part in question is the comment "Pete is a fraud, a liar and
a cheat." as well as some other comments in your article.
We cannot and do not make any judgement as to whether such material is
defensible. However, the state of the law at the moment means that if
we are put on notice that defamatory material is being published through
our systems, Thus plc may be liable for damages, along with you, if it
does not take action to prevent that material being published. Those
damages could be substantial and we could both incur heavy legal
expenses.
In addition, the current state of the law could leave Thus plc
liable if it failed to take action and you disseminated any further
material through our systems which was later found to be defamatory.
While we do not necessarily agree with the current legal position we
must accept it, and have therefore removed the posting in question.
Please reply to this email acknowledging that you understand the problem
and that you will not, in future, publish further material which
could be considered defamatory of Pete through Demon's systems.
We attach below a suggested form of acknowledgement for your
convenience.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT
I acknowledge receipt of your email and confirm that I understand your
explanation of the legal situation regarding material which is
considered defamatory.
I confirm that I will not publish such material in future using my Demon
service, and will not publish further material which could be considered
defamatory of Pete.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Demon Legal Team.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.
- Next message: Nick Maclaren: "Re: Another Boy Shot By "Lampers" The DANGERS of letting perverts run with firearms."
- Previous message: Nick Maclaren: "Re: Another Boy Shot By "Lampers" The DANGERS of letting perverts run with firearms."
- Maybe in reply to: Derek Moody: "Re: Another Boy Shot By "Lampers" The DANGERS of letting perverts run with firearms."
- Next in thread: Thargoid: "Re: Another Boy Shot By "Lampers" The DANGERS of letting perverts run with firearms."
- Reply: Thargoid: "Re: Another Boy Shot By "Lampers" The DANGERS of letting perverts run with firearms."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]