Re: Use of Batons (was Re: Police Brutality)

From: Jim Webster (Jim_at_zerospam.oik.pet)
Date: 09/28/04 

Date: 28 Sep 2004 19:10:56 GMT

On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 13:16:51 +0100, "Leslie"
<science.fiction@ukonline.co.uk> wrote:

>Hello Jim
>Perhaps it would be good if you old townies kept out of the counyryside and
>buttoned your lips.
>
>have a n ice day .........................Leslie

And let you bunch of faggots have free rein! *** off.

>
>"Jim Webster" <Jim@zerospam.oik.pet> wrote in message
>news:mnqcl097jvln34uoh3i0lmvd517g5d6433@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:43:24 +0100, "Greenslader" <nospam@thank.yu>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >"Shroomer" <Shroomer@SPAMNOTJointIntelligenceCommittee.com> wrote in
>message
>> >news:0gijk01ae8tkpb6rlgecid67epmtl2l3vn@4ax.com...
>> >> Steve Freestone <steve@tv-lincsDIESPAMMERS.org.ukDIESPAMMERS> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Seriously, I thought that Police when using Batons could only aim them
>> >> >to the body, but the TV pictures coming in are clearly showing the
>> >> >Police aiming the Batons to head height.
>> >>
>> >> I think it's because they heard how much hunters enjoy an uneven
>> >> contest...
>> >>
>> >
>> >Perhaps the police should have used tactics more in keeping with the
>spirit
>> >of the event.
>> >The protestors would have been far more understanding if they'd had set
>dogs
>> >on them before being hit them over the heads with sticks.
>> >
>>
>> One things for sure the state benefit poncing, subsidy driven
>> upbringing, pro hunt perverts will think twice before coming to London
>> and try to bully us again.
>>
>> Well done the metropolitan police, a lesson to be learned there. How
>> real policing is done.
>>
>>
>> --
>> *******************
>> *You can't win 'em all.*
>> Lord Haw Haw.
>>
>>
>> Newsgroup ettiquette
>> 1) Tell everyone the Trolls don't bother you.
>> 2) Say you've killfiled them, yet continue to respond.
>> 3) Tell other people off who repsond despite doing so yourself.
>> 4) Continually talk about Trolls while maintaining
>> they're having no effect.
>> 5) Publicly post killfile rules so the Trolls know
>> how to avoid them.
>> 6) Make lame legal threats and other barrel scraping
>> manoeuvres when your abuse reports are ignored.
>> 7) Eat vast quantities of pies.
>> 8) Forget to brush your teeth for several decades.
>> 9) Help a demon.local poster with their email while
>> secretly reading it.
>> 10) Pretend you're a hard *** when in fact you're
>> as bent as a roundabout.
>> 11) Become the laughing stock of Usenet like Mabbet
>> 12) Die of old age
>> 13) Keep paying Dr Chartham his fees and hope one day you
>> will have a penis the girls can see.
>>
>> We have received an allegation that you have posted an article/s to
>> newsgroups
>demon.local,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals,
>>
>uk.environment.conservation,uk.rec.birdwatching,scot.birds,uk.rec.gardening,
>> uk.business.agriculture,uk.rec.fishing.coarse,sci.agriculture.poultry
>> [<kmfdljArhNO5EwYq@4AX.com and others>] which our external solicitors
>> believe to bear a defamatory meaning and as such we have had to remove
>> the article from our servers.
>>
>> The part in question is the comment "Pete is a fraud, a liar and
>> a cheat." as well as some other comments in your article.
>>
>> We cannot and do not make any judgement as to whether such material is
>> defensible. However, the state of the law at the moment means that if
>> we are put on notice that defamatory material is being published through
>> our systems, Thus plc may be liable for damages, along with you, if it
>> does not take action to prevent that material being published. Those
>> damages could be substantial and we could both incur heavy legal
>> expenses.
>>
>> In addition, the current state of the law could leave Thus plc
>> liable if it failed to take action and you disseminated any further
>> material through our systems which was later found to be defamatory.
>>
>> While we do not necessarily agree with the current legal position we
>> must accept it, and have therefore removed the posting in question.
>>
>> Please reply to this email acknowledging that you understand the problem
>> and that you will not, in future, publish further material which
>> could be considered defamatory of Pete through Demon's systems.
>>
>> We attach below a suggested form of acknowledgement for your
>> convenience.
>>
>> ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT
>>
>> I acknowledge receipt of your email and confirm that I understand your
>> explanation of the legal situation regarding material which is
>> considered defamatory.
>>
>> I confirm that I will not publish such material in future using my Demon
>> service, and will not publish further material which could be considered
>> defamatory of Pete.
>>
>> I look forward to hearing from you.
>> Demon Legal Team.
>>
>> FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
>> which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
>> owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
>> understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
>> democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
>> that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
>> provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with
>Title
>> 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
>> profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
>included
>> information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
>> subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more
>information
>> go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.
> 

--
              *******************
*You can't win 'em all.* 
     Lord Haw Haw.    
Newsgroup ettiquette
1) Tell everyone the Trolls don't bother you.
2) Say you've killfiled them, yet continue to respond.
3) Tell other people off who repsond despite doing so yourself.
4) Continually talk about Trolls while maintaining 
    they're having no effect.
5)  Publicly post killfile rules so the Trolls know 
    how to avoid them.
6)  Make lame legal threats and other barrel scraping
    manoeuvres when your abuse reports are ignored.
7)  Eat vast quantities of pies.
8)  Forget to brush your teeth for several decades.
9)  Help a demon.local poster with their email while 
    secretly reading it.
10) Pretend you're a hard *** when in fact you're
    as bent as a roundabout.
11) Become the laughing stock of Usenet like Mabbet
12) Die of old age
13) Keep paying Dr Chartham his fees and hope one day you
    will have a penis the girls can see.
We have received an allegation that you have posted an article/s to
newsgroups demon.local,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals,
uk.environment.conservation,uk.rec.birdwatching,scot.birds,uk.rec.gardening,
uk.business.agriculture,uk.rec.fishing.coarse,sci.agriculture.poultry
[<kmfdljArhNO5EwYq@4AX.com and others>] which our external solicitors
believe to bear a defamatory meaning and as such we have had to remove
the article from our servers. 
The part in question is the comment "Pete is a fraud, a liar and
a cheat." as well as some other comments in your article.
We cannot and do not make any judgement as to whether such material is
defensible.  However, the state of the law at the moment means that if
we are put on notice that defamatory material is being published through
our systems, Thus plc may be liable for damages, along with you, if it
does not take action to prevent that material being published. Those
damages could be substantial and we could both incur heavy legal
expenses.
In addition, the current state of the law could leave Thus plc
liable if it failed to take action and you disseminated any further
material through our systems which was later found to be defamatory.
While we do not necessarily agree with the current legal position we
must accept it, and have therefore removed the posting in question.
Please reply to this email acknowledging that you understand the problem
and that you will not, in future, publish further material which
could be considered defamatory of Pete through Demon's systems. 
We attach below a suggested form of acknowledgement for your
convenience.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT
I acknowledge receipt of your email and confirm that I understand your
explanation of the legal situation regarding material which is
considered defamatory.
I confirm that I will not publish such material in future using my Demon
service, and will not publish further material which could be considered
defamatory of Pete.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Demon Legal Team.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information
go to:  http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.