Re: Another Boy Shot By "Lampers" The DANGERS of letting perverts run with firearms.

From: Jim Webster (Jim_at_zerospam.oik.pet)
Date: 09/28/04 

Date: 28 Sep 2004 19:14:20 GMT

On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 20:20:05 +0000 (UTC), "Thargoid"
<tharg@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"Nick Maclaren" <nmm1@cus.cam.ac.dc> wrote in message
>news:kknbl0h6mdu7e8f14bfhq5k12l6g0aed09@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 21:06:32 +0000 (UTC), "Thargoid"
>> <tharg@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> > in front of your computer writing
>> >messages that most people won't see (because they've killfiled you)
>>
>> You all say that, it's an old con that nobody falls for.
>
>Count the messages in this thread. Discard replies from yourself and your
>sockpuppets. Discard replies from the few 'usual suspects' and their
>sockpuppets. How many does that leave? Not many eh?
>
>> > and most
>> >others will ignore (because you are just such a tiresome buffoon).
>>
>> But not you eek, eek.
>
>Indeed not, being a tiresome buffoon requires much hard work (or inherent
>talent). I was not born with buffoonery in my blood, nor do I have the
>dedication to work at it. You however score highly on both counts. In
>fact, if buffoonery carried a title you would be a king.
>
>> > Never
>> >mind, I get enjoyment out of reading your rants.
>>
>> My public is all that matters.
>
>See my comment above about messages in this thread (it applies equally to
>other threads of yours too by the way).
>
>> > apart from your sock puppets of course. I'm really
>> >glad for you because, having failed in real life,
>>
>> Ouch that is so hurtful. I thought I was running rings around you and
>> your pedo meatarian sidekicks?
>
>Once more you bring sexual deviancy into your reply. I'm truly beginning to
>worry about you.
>
>> > you've made yourself an
>> >entire internet life instead and that is to be applauded.
>>
>> I'd like to deposit semen down your throat.
>
>At last an admission that you are homosexual. I've suspected as much for a
>while now.
>
>Anyway, that's enough idle chatter, I'm off to pastures greener for a while
>but I'll be back eventually. In the meantime feel free to slag me off as
>much as you like. I realise that it's difficult when someone tells you the
>truth and that, for your own sanity, you need to constantly convince
>yourself that your life is meaningful (when it patently is not) so I do
>understand why you are permanently in denial.

So painful to watch you struggle for some cred. 

--
              *******************
*You can't win 'em all.* 
     Lord Haw Haw.    
Newsgroup ettiquette
1) Tell everyone the Trolls don't bother you.
2) Say you've killfiled them, yet continue to respond.
3) Tell other people off who repsond despite doing so yourself.
4) Continually talk about Trolls while maintaining 
    they're having no effect.
5)  Publicly post killfile rules so the Trolls know 
    how to avoid them.
6)  Make lame legal threats and other barrel scraping
    manoeuvres when your abuse reports are ignored.
7)  Eat vast quantities of pies.
8)  Forget to brush your teeth for several decades.
9)  Help a demon.local poster with their email while 
    secretly reading it.
10) Pretend you're a hard *** when in fact you're
    as bent as a roundabout.
11) Become the laughing stock of Usenet like Mabbet
12) Die of old age
13) Keep paying Dr Chartham his fees and hope one day you
    will have a penis the girls can see.
We have received an allegation that you have posted an article/s to
newsgroups demon.local,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals,
uk.environment.conservation,uk.rec.birdwatching,scot.birds,uk.rec.gardening,
uk.business.agriculture,uk.rec.fishing.coarse,sci.agriculture.poultry
[<kmfdljArhNO5EwYq@4AX.com and others>] which our external solicitors
believe to bear a defamatory meaning and as such we have had to remove
the article from our servers. 
The part in question is the comment "Pete is a fraud, a liar and
a cheat." as well as some other comments in your article.
We cannot and do not make any judgement as to whether such material is
defensible.  However, the state of the law at the moment means that if
we are put on notice that defamatory material is being published through
our systems, Thus plc may be liable for damages, along with you, if it
does not take action to prevent that material being published. Those
damages could be substantial and we could both incur heavy legal
expenses.
In addition, the current state of the law could leave Thus plc
liable if it failed to take action and you disseminated any further
material through our systems which was later found to be defamatory.
While we do not necessarily agree with the current legal position we
must accept it, and have therefore removed the posting in question.
Please reply to this email acknowledging that you understand the problem
and that you will not, in future, publish further material which
could be considered defamatory of Pete through Demon's systems. 
We attach below a suggested form of acknowledgement for your
convenience.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT
I acknowledge receipt of your email and confirm that I understand your
explanation of the legal situation regarding material which is
considered defamatory.
I confirm that I will not publish such material in future using my Demon
service, and will not publish further material which could be considered
defamatory of Pete.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Demon Legal Team.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information
go to:  http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.