Re: London Re: A FAQ
- From: bruce.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Bruce Sinclair)
- Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 20:38:14 GMT
In article <42d38089$0$27202$ed2619ec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, " Jill." <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Bruce Sinclair wrote:
>>> - but London itself is back to
>>> work today -- over the weekend there was a huge gathering of
>>> thousands of people to commemorate the end of WWII and including
>>> the Royal family and many others in front of Buckingham Palace
>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4668737.stm
>>> There was also events like the British Grand Prix at Silverstone
>>> which all went ahead.
>>
>> Thanks for that. I feel pride for the people of london ... and pride
>> in
>> anyhting is not something that is usual for me at all.
>
>Your sentiment is appreciated
>
>Its a shame the US military bosses based in the UK are not so empathetic.
>They have kept in place a bann on all US military personnel and urged all
>relatives going anywhere near London despite the rest of the country being
>told its business as usual. Daft -- That - combined with Bush's
>inappropriate response last night at, of all places, an FBI audience does
>illustrate the lack of understanding the higher echelons of US government
>have of terrorism - and possibly why we are in such a mess over it all. He
>harped on about it being a "fight" "battle" "war" and went on about military
>options. This was a "Criminal" act - and maybe if he extolled the FBI to
>their best ever efforts and put the perpetrators into the class of the
>criminal element insteadof playing to their martyrdom of "warriers" fighting
>a war it might - just might help. Over here its the police who are the main
>players in the resolution of this abhorrance -- not the army.
>The US governement's inexperience of bombings on their soil does show up
>sometimes. Its very interesting to see and hear - Bush seemed desperate to
>suggest he understood - but the words were just wrong somehow.
Total agreement here.
>> Best summed up perhaps by the picture of the flag at the palace at
>> half
>> mast. An acknowledgement - but not a reaction.
>
>The Palace have learnt to respond rather quicker these days :~)
>
>> Thank you one and all.
>
>I hope the families are put out of their misery waiting for confirmation
>soon. While, from the outside, the police and forensic position is
>understandable - it must be completely unbearable for the relatives.
Agreed. I heard this morning that the police have searched houses and
arrested someone. Kind of reassuring if true ... and they have the right
people.
The french govt thought they could get away with this sort of thing here too
... and were quickly proved wrong. The police seem to be a lot better at
solving these crimes than bush will ever be at "winning" his "war".
Thanks again. :)
Bruce
-------------------------------------
The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it.
- George Bernard Shaw
Cynic, n: a blackguard whose faulty vision sees things as they are, not as they ought to be.
- Ambrose Bierce
Caution ===== followups may have been changed to relevant groups
(if there were any)
.
- References:
- Re: A FAQ
- From: Rosyposey
- Re: A FAQ
- From: Kathleen
- Re: A FAQ
- From: Jill.
- Re: A FAQ
- From: Bruce Sinclair
- Re: A FAQ
- From: Jill.
- Re: A FAQ
- From: Ann
- Re: A FAQ
- From: Jill.
- Re: A FAQ
- From: Ann
- Re: A FAQ
- From: Ann
- London Re: A FAQ
- From: Jill.
- Re: London Re: A FAQ
- From: Bruce Sinclair
- Re: London Re: A FAQ
- From: Jill.
- Re: London Re: A FAQ
- From: Bruce Sinclair
- Re: London Re: A FAQ
- From: Jill.
- Re: A FAQ
- Prev by Date: Re: A FAQ
- Next by Date: Bark chippings instead of straw?
- Previous by thread: Re: London Re: A FAQ
- Next by thread: Re: A FAQ
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|