Re: Rooster battles?

Jill wrote:

Ron Hardin wrote:

Animal happiness isn't what you're hallucinating it is.

Christina knows more about animal psychology and physiology than you do. The
content of your posts indicate your ignorance.

There is nothing "fluffbunny" or anthropomorphic about what we are all
saying.
It is simple animal husbandry. Its almost amusing to accuse this particular
group of poultry keepers of not understanding - most of us are very happy
to eat our birds, and are very pragmatic about what they need and don't.
These are domestic creatures - they bear only a superficial resemblance to
their wild, original ancestors, who were not native in Ohio either.
They have been completely created by man, to be fed and cared for by man.
You took possession of them from the moment you described them as "my".
You asked for advice for "your" cockerels.
You were given good advice from people with a wide breadth of experience.
From your continued posts you have ignored all the advice and from the
content of the posts you have not taken on board any of it and you are now a
direct cause of suffering to those birds.
It is that which no-one can stomach here. It is not necessary and you no
longer have the excuse of ignorance.

You need more anthropomorphism, not less.

Psych 101 ruined more potential animal trainers than anything else. It made
them genuinely stupid.
--
rhhardin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On the internet, nobody knows you're a jerk.
.