Re: blotchy shells
- From: "eggbox" <privatedrive2001-topica@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 18:32:05 -0000
"rumblings" <rumblingsDELETE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:64q2ujF2dbgngU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
eggbox wrote:
"Jill" <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:13uf2f8pj9p01aa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Look at the reports of the meat bird eggs being sold.
They seem a bit confused as to what they are : Sasso are not the same
thing
as Cobb
And the feedback is listed in the description - as being from the
brother-in-law's account but they do not seem to figure in the buyers
lists.
This is interesting, I've had a closer look at these two sellers, lot's that
don't add up there. Look at this item number 160212763798, look at the
bidding page, the seller abbeychooks is bidding for eggs they sell
themselves, on an auction run by the seller nununini01 which uses text
exactly the same as abbeychooks meat egg auctions. Not only this, but
nununini01 leaves feedback for their buyers saying "Many thanks for buying
fertile eggs from ABBEY CHOOKS Happy Hatching " . So who is who here? Both
the same by my reckoning, and not only that, bidding on each others
auctions.
Yes this does indeed look fishy. I can't think of an explanation and
have emailed abbeychooks to ask for one.
I have also now seen this auction by nununini01 http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=160210802397 sold on 23 Feb 6 Welsummer eggs, on 3rd March nununini01 left feedback for the 'BUYER' saying "Many thanks, we had 6 out of 6 hatch last night pics will be up on PP later:)" see here http://feedback.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewFeedback2&userid=nununini01&ftab=FeedbackLeftForOthers , now this leaves me confused on two counts. Firstly how can 6 eggs sold on 23rd Feb hatch by 3rd March? Also, why would a seller leave a buyer feedback saying 6 out of 6 hatched??? Isn't it the buyer that would leave the feedback reflecting this, presuming that these are super chickens that can hatch in just 8 days from being sold?
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: blotchy shells
- From: rumblings
- Re: blotchy shells
- References:
- blotchy shells
- From: rumblings
- Re: blotchy shells
- From: Amy Blankenship
- Re: blotchy shells
- From: rumblings
- Re: blotchy shells
- From: Amy Blankenship
- Re: blotchy shells
- From: rumblings
- Re: blotchy shells
- From: Jill
- Re: blotchy shells
- From: rumblings
- Re: blotchy shells
- From: eggbox
- Re: blotchy shells
- From: rumblings
- Re: blotchy shells
- From: eggbox
- Re: blotchy shells
- From: rumblings
- Re: blotchy shells
- From: Jill
- Re: blotchy shells
- From: rumblings
- Re: blotchy shells
- From: Jill
- Re: blotchy shells
- From: rumblings
- Re: blotchy shells
- From: Jill
- Re: blotchy shells
- From: rumblings
- Re: blotchy shells
- From: Jill
- Re: blotchy shells
- From: rumblings
- Re: blotchy shells
- From: Amy Blankenship
- Re: blotchy shells
- From: Jill
- Re: blotchy shells
- From: rumblings
- Re: blotchy shells
- From: Jill
- Re: blotchy shells
- From: eggbox
- Re: blotchy shells
- From: rumblings
- blotchy shells
- Prev by Date: Re: blotchy shells
- Next by Date: Re: blotchy shells
- Previous by thread: Re: blotchy shells
- Next by thread: Re: blotchy shells
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|