Re: Fire apes
From: Michael Clark (biteme_at_spammer.com)
Date: 07/21/04
- Next message: Michael Clark: "Re: Fire apes"
- Previous message: Dave Eadsforth: "Re: colour vision"
- In reply to: Ross Macfarlane: "Re: Fire apes"
- Next in thread: Andrew Nowicki: "Re: Fire apes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 05:08:46 -0500
"Ross Macfarlane" <rmacfarl@alphalink.com.au> wrote in message
news:18fa6145.0407201639.673e3cf3@posting.google.com...
> "Michael Clark" <biteme@spammer.com> wrote in message
news:<10fps7beh40597c@corp.supernews.com>...
> > "Ross Macfarlane" <rmacfarl@alphalink.com.au> wrote in message
> ...
> > > Here is my summary of the Fire Ape Theory:
> > >
> > > A load of unsupported rubbish.
> >
[...]
>
> But - there's a danger here. Is the fun going out of this place? Where
> would we be without our weekly dose of cyber bear-baiting? Where, I
> ask you, is the next netloon coming from??
You want loons? Usenet is full of loons. Someone just proudly announced
their presence the other day --M3D, or something. There he was, puffing
his chest out with Marco, arguing over some quibble but insisting that water
and wading led to obligate bipedalism. I like the ass-whooping Algis is
getting
from NAS but I'm afraid Algis is too stupid to sense it. Let's hope M3D
hangs
around long enough to get his share.
> Ross Macfarlane :-)
-- Yada, yada, yada.
- Next message: Michael Clark: "Re: Fire apes"
- Previous message: Dave Eadsforth: "Re: colour vision"
- In reply to: Ross Macfarlane: "Re: Fire apes"
- Next in thread: Andrew Nowicki: "Re: Fire apes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|