Re: New findings cast doubt on "race isn't real" claim
From: P.Comm (tjsrno_at_spampost.com)
Date: 09/10/04
- Next message: TomS: "Re: PZ on Bird/Frog Development -- Great article -- Should it be an FAQ?"
- Previous message: Marc Verhaegen: "Re: What is the Aquatic theory?"
- In reply to: Jupiter: "New findings cast doubt on "race isn't real" claim"
- Next in thread: dave e: "Re: New findings cast doubt on "race isn't real" claim"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 09:01:15 GMT
-- X-No-Archive: Yes "Jupiter" <jekluk@aol.com> wrote in message news:x6J%c.32936$Ot3.23897@twister.nyc.rr.com... > For years, mainstream scientists have said there are no real racial > differences among people. Race is purely a "social construct" -- in other > words, it's imaginary, some have argued. > But two new studies raise doubts about a key calculation on which this > argument rests.This calculation, often cited publicly by world-renowned > geneticists, is that all humans are more than 99.9 percent genetically > identical. > http://www.world-science.net/exclusives/040908_racefrm > Well, "Family" must not be real either - since we are 98.6 different from Chimps - or a higher number. Only "order" is real. LOL. NO. PHYLUM is real. NO. Kingdom is real. Yes. > > >
- Next message: TomS: "Re: PZ on Bird/Frog Development -- Great article -- Should it be an FAQ?"
- Previous message: Marc Verhaegen: "Re: What is the Aquatic theory?"
- In reply to: Jupiter: "New findings cast doubt on "race isn't real" claim"
- Next in thread: dave e: "Re: New findings cast doubt on "race isn't real" claim"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading