Re: What is the Aquatic theory?
From: Aardvark J. Bandersnatch, MP (someone_at_micrsfot.com)
Date: 09/12/04
- Next message: Paul Crowley: "Re: What is the Aquatic theory?"
- Previous message: Harlequin: "Re: PZ on Bird/Frog Development -- Great article -- Should it be an FAQ?"
- In reply to: Algis Kuliukas: "Re: What is the Aquatic theory?"
- Next in thread: Marc Verhaegen: "Re: What is the Aquatic theory?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 00:17:51 GMT
"Algis Kuliukas" <algis@RiverApes.com> wrote in message
news:77a70442.0409092243.508b2408@posting.google.com...
> No, you don't need to explain it, Jim. I've read the line of your
> arguments often enough by now. Take the weakest point, exaggerate it
> enough for it to become ridiculous and reject it.
BTW, that's called "Strawman" argument. It's a useful tool for those who
don't have very strong counter-arguments.
- Next message: Paul Crowley: "Re: What is the Aquatic theory?"
- Previous message: Harlequin: "Re: PZ on Bird/Frog Development -- Great article -- Should it be an FAQ?"
- In reply to: Algis Kuliukas: "Re: What is the Aquatic theory?"
- Next in thread: Marc Verhaegen: "Re: What is the Aquatic theory?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|