Re: Is SCIENCE magazine 2 or more years behind; Re: Orrorin
From: Rich Travsky (traRvEsky_at_hotMOVEmail.com)
Date: 09/13/04
- Next message: Rich Travsky: "Re: Bipedal Orrorin?"
- Previous message: Lee Olsen: "Re: Where are the remains of the "coastal" pre-Clovis?"
- In reply to: Mario Petrinovich: "Re: Is SCIENCE magazine 2 or more years behind; Re: Orrorin"
- Next in thread: Mario Petrinovich: "Re: Is SCIENCE magazine 2 or more years behind; Re: Orrorin"
- Reply: Mario Petrinovich: "Re: Is SCIENCE magazine 2 or more years behind; Re: Orrorin"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 21:33:10 -0600
Mario Petrinovich wrote:
>
> J Moore:
> > I'm sorry, Mario, but this info is very well known and comes from
> > research.
> > Chimps do throw well, as do other primates besides humans -- your
> > contention
> > that they don't runs counter to many observations over many decades.
>
> Ok. What is, for you, throwing well? No2: Well for what purpose?
Throwing well: hit your target.
Purpose? To hit something. This is obvious.
> I am convinced that you are convinced that this is true. Only,
> anybody realistic cannot be convinced that chimps are defending themselves
> by throwing stones. And throw well enough to be able to defend themselves. I
> never heard of such thing. I even never heard anything close to this. I only
> heard fairy tales. Fairy tales which was ready to acquire anybody who wonted
> something like this to be true. -- Mario
Are you claiming chimps can't throw?
http://www.janegoodall.ca/inst/inst_gombe_frodo.html
...
Frodo soon became something of a bully. He was not well liked by other
chimps - or human observers. He become one of Gombe's few accurate stone
throwers!
...
And here's something Marc (of all people) posted:
Frans de Waal [evol-psych] 22.9.01: "Now, please, don't
believe everything you hear about apes not throwing. Darwin
was talking about monkeys, and Goodall's chimps may not have
had much practice. In all research facilities with
chimpanzees it is known how well apes throw. This is why
projectiles are kept away from them, and why they mostly work
with feces. They are deadly accurate, they swing around from
the back of their cage and invariably "nail" the one new face
in the crowd with deadly accuracy. Ask any worker in such a
facility: it's not rare, and no illusion! Out in the open,
their skills are even more striking. I used to photograph the
Arnhem chimpanzees from across the moat, where they were at
about 10 m from me. I had to be extremely careful because
young males tended to throw extremely well. They would see my
eye go behind the camera, and all of a sudden it turned out
they had a stone with them which they'd throw at me. Males
more than females, mostly overhand. (Another tidbit in the
debate whether they know if our eyes are for seeing or not
.). Then there was the mother who came to the reception with
her crying son. She complained that our chimps threw stones.
After questioning and an account by a bystander it turned out
that the boy had thrown first, and that the same stone had
come back to him. The estimated distance of this case was 25
m. In short, the idea that apes can't throw is bogus. It has
been around for a long time, but should be tested with apes
who have had target practice. I invite all man-the-thrower
advocates for a visit - at least if they don't mind some
smelly stuff coming their way!"
- Next message: Rich Travsky: "Re: Bipedal Orrorin?"
- Previous message: Lee Olsen: "Re: Where are the remains of the "coastal" pre-Clovis?"
- In reply to: Mario Petrinovich: "Re: Is SCIENCE magazine 2 or more years behind; Re: Orrorin"
- Next in thread: Mario Petrinovich: "Re: Is SCIENCE magazine 2 or more years behind; Re: Orrorin"
- Reply: Mario Petrinovich: "Re: Is SCIENCE magazine 2 or more years behind; Re: Orrorin"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|