Re: Is SCIENCE magazine 2 or more years behind; Re: Orrorin
From: Marc Verhaegen (fa204466_at_skynet.be)
Date: 09/13/04
- Next message: Marc Verhaegen: "Re: What is the Aquatic theory?"
- Previous message: Dr.GH: "Re: PZ on Bird/Frog Development -- Great article -- Should it be an FAQ?"
- In reply to: J Moore: "Re: Is SCIENCE magazine 2 or more years behind; Re: Orrorin"
- Next in thread: Rich Travsky: "Re: Is SCIENCE magazine 2 or more years behind; Re: Orrorin"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 18:28:48 +0200
"J Moore" <anthrosciguy@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:m441d.386956$M95.282227@pd7tw1no...
> For a scientific critique of the aquatic ape theory, go to
http://allserv.rug.ac.be/~mvaneech/Symposium.html
- Next message: Marc Verhaegen: "Re: What is the Aquatic theory?"
- Previous message: Dr.GH: "Re: PZ on Bird/Frog Development -- Great article -- Should it be an FAQ?"
- In reply to: J Moore: "Re: Is SCIENCE magazine 2 or more years behind; Re: Orrorin"
- Next in thread: Rich Travsky: "Re: Is SCIENCE magazine 2 or more years behind; Re: Orrorin"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
