moore blabla (Re: What is the Aquatic theory?

From: Marc Verhaegen (fa204466_at_skynet.be)
Date: 09/22/04 

Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:05:33 +0200

"J Moore" <anthrosciguy@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1P44d.468992$M95.105321@pd7tw1no...

> And we'll all throw in the towel, Algis, so you can can go back to your
corner and lick your wounds

:-D Don't be ridiculous, Moore. Who is licking his wounds?? Who has no
argument against the seaside hypothesis?? Who is so stupid that he still
believes in savanna-running hominids??

These guys don't know anything, but think they're God the Father. They have
nothing: no arguments, not even an alternative to our view. They have no
clue why humans are better divers than chimps, are more naked, have more SC
fat, are no climbers any more etc.etc. Algis, please stop wasting your time
with these blind fools: "discussions" with these people are no better than
with creationists: a sterile exercise. These people are the scum of PA, big
mouths here, insults, no sense of humour, unable to publish. Luckily, unlike
the short-sighted fools we see here at s.a.p, serious PAs are now open to
the waterside hypothesis, eg, Stringer in this forum 14.9.01: "In the past I
have agreed that we lack plausible models for the origins of bipedalism and
have agreed that wading in water can facilitate bipedal locomotion (as
observed in other normally quadrupedal primates). I have never said that
this must have been the forcing mechanism in hominids, but I do consider it
plausible. As for coastal colonisation, I argued in my Nature News & Views
last year that this was an event in the late Pleistocene that may have
facilitated the spread of modern humans."

http://allserv.rug.ac.be/~mvaneech/outthere.htm

http://www.onelist.com/community/AAT