back to anthropological theory (Re: My two pesos on Theories/Paradigms.)

From: Tedd Jacobs (Jacobs_at_mail.boisestate.edu)
Date: 09/22/04 

Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:09:58 -0600

"John Wilkins" wrote...
> Philip Deitiker <Donevenask@worlnet.att.net> wrote:
>
>> I have made a good effort to apply the basic modalities of
>> propoganda identification to these theorist.
> ...
>> I will hand Wilkins a quote from Vigilante et al. 1991 which
>> shows the degree of bias in formulating a theory.
> ...
>
> None of which gives me any better idea on the nature of a theory in
> anthropology, I'm afraid, although it might hint at how theory is
> formulated and applied in genetics and phylogenetics, which I already
> had an idea of. But thanks.
>
> Incidentally,...

incidentally... if you ever get it figured out forward over a copy. i'd be
interested in knowing what it is i believe as well.

tedd. 

-- 
"Pompeii is not an example of the Pompeii premise."- Christopher L. Hill.