Re: What is the Aquatic theory?

From: firstjois (firstjoisyike_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 09/22/04 

Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:08:13 -0400

Algis Kuliukas wrote:
>> rmacfarl@alphalink.com.au (Ross Macfarlane) wrote in message
>> news:<18fa6145.0409212255.59cb59bc@posting.google.com>...
>>> "J Moore" <anthrosciguy@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:<1P44d.468992$M95.105321@pd7tw1no>...
>>>> ...
>>>>> Blimey. I thought the aquasceptic position was devoid of strong
>>>>> arguments but I never realised it had got *this* bad.
>>>>>
>>>>> I guess it's time to throw in the towel, you lot.
>>
>>>> Well, Algis, you see, this is a series of very silly jokes in this
>>>> part of the thread, you know: odd little statements that aren't
>>>> actually intended to be serious.
>>>
>>> <Sigh...> Not the first time that Algis has displayed a
>>> pathologically
>>> low level of sensitivity to irony...
>>>
>>> Ross Macafarlane
>>
>> You think firstjois is capable of irony? You know, I'd never thought
>> of that.
>>
>> Algis Kuliukas

That's okay, I've been wondering about your thinking skills all along.

Jois

Relevant Pages