sci.anthropology.paleo
By Thread

1690 messages sorted by: [ date ]

---

Starting: 09/30/04
Ending: 10/31/04

• BOOOOOO to You, Too! Ed Conrad (10/31/04)
• Invitation to the new "Flores Man" Yahoo group Dan Gannon (10/29/04)
• Re: Baabaablacksheephaveyouanybullyessiryessir10000bagsfull Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy) (10/29/04)
  • Re: Baabaablacksheephaveyouanybullyessiryessir10000bagsfull John Griffin (10/29/04)
  • Re: Baabaablacksheephaveyouanybullyessiryessir10000bagsfull Mr. 4X (10/29/04)
  • Re: Baabaablacksheephaveyouanybullyessiryessir10000bagsfull Bookman (10/30/04)
• floresensis Tools, Fire, And Hunting Rich Travsky (10/29/04)
• floresensis: Interview With Peter Brown Rich Travsky (10/29/04)
• Another 'heavyweight' gives some 'support' to Elaine Morgan and AAH Algis Kuliukas (10/29/04)
  • Re: Another 'heavyweight' gives some 'support' to Elaine Morgan and AAH Lorenzo L. Love (10/29/04)
    • Re: Another 'heavyweight' gives some 'support' to Elaine Morgan and AAH Algis Kuliukas (10/29/04)
      • Re: Another heavyweight mentions in passing Elaine Morgan and AAH Rich Travsky (10/29/04)
      • Re: Another heavyweight mentions in passing Elaine Morgan and AAH firstjois (10/29/04)
      • Re: Another heavyweight mentions in passing Elaine Morgan and AAH Nick Maclaren (10/29/04)
      • Re: Another heavyweight mentions in passing Elaine Morgan and AAH Jason Eshleman (10/29/04)
      • Re: Another heavyweight mentions in passing Elaine Morgan and AAH firstjois (10/29/04)
      • Re: Another heavyweight mentions in passing Elaine Morgan and AAH Nick Maclaren (10/30/04)
      • Re: Another heavyweight mentions in passing Elaine Morgan and AAH Jason Eshleman (10/30/04)
      • Re: Another heavyweight mentions in passing Elaine Morgan and AAH Algis Kuliukas (10/30/04)
      • Re: Another 'heavyweight' gives some 'support' to Elaine Morgan and AAH Lorenzo L. Love (10/29/04)
      • Re: Another heavyweight gives some 'support' to Elaine Morgan and AAH firstjois (10/29/04)
      • Re: Another heavyweight gives some 'support' to Elaine Morgan and AAH firstjois (10/29/04)
  • Re: Another 'heavyweight' gives some 'support' to Elaine Morgan and AAH Marc Verhaegen (10/29/04)
• Re: Tiny new species of human found Darkfalz (10/29/04)
• Use of fire by "other" hominids? Paul Ciszek (10/29/04)
  • Re: Use of fire by "other" hominids? Nick Maclaren (10/29/04)
  • Re: Use of fire by "other" hominids? Sverker Johansson (10/29/04)
• Variation by Transposables - Hope it wraps right! firstjois (10/28/04)
• Supernova explosion 2.8 MYA Andrew Nowicki (10/28/04)
  • Re: Supernova explosion 2.8 MYA Andrew Nowicki (10/28/04)
  • Re: Supernova explosion 2.8 MYA John Roth (10/29/04)
• dwarf humans... growth hormone deficiency? James Michael Howard (10/28/04)
  • Re: dwarf humans... growth hormone deficiency? Marc Verhaegen (10/28/04)
    • Re: dwarf humans... growth hormone deficiency? James Michael Howard (10/28/04)
      • Re: dwarf humans... growth hormone deficiency? Quitten McKrappen (10/29/04)
• Secular trend real and robust James Michael Howard (10/28/04)
• Stonethrowing theory and the new find of Homo floresienes Archimedes Plutonium (10/28/04)
• Re: Trilobites rcook5_at_TAKEOUTmindspring.com (10/28/04)
  • Re: Trilobites rcook5_at_TAKEOUTmindspring.com (10/28/04)
  • Re: Trilobites pete (10/28/04)
• floresiensis Hair Sample? Rich Travsky (10/28/04)
• Journal of Human Evolution, vol. 47, no. 4, Oct., 2004: Table of Contents Phillip Bigelow (10/28/04)
• Flores Man Marc Verhaegen (10/27/04)
  • Re: Flores Man Raimo Kangasniemi (10/27/04)
    • Re: Flores Man Marc Verhaegen (10/27/04)
    • Re: Flores Man Philip Deitiker (10/28/04)
      • Re: Flores Man firstjois (10/28/04)
  • Re: Flores Man Quitten McKrappen (10/28/04)
    • Re: Flores Man Marc Verhaegen (10/28/04)
      • Re: Flores Man Quitten McKrappen (10/29/04)
      • Re: Flores Man Quitten McKrappen (10/29/04)
      • Re: Flores Man Marc Verhaegen (10/29/04)
      • Re: Flores Man Raimo Kangasniemi (10/29/04)
      • Re: Flores Man Market Theory (10/31/04)
  • Re: Flores Man Algis Kuliukas (10/28/04)
    • Re: Flores Man Marc Verhaegen (10/28/04)
      • Re: Flores Man No Alternative (10/29/04)
      • Re: Flores Man Raimo Kangasniemi (10/29/04)
      • Re: Flores Man Marc Verhaegen (10/29/04)
      • Re: Flores Man deowll (10/30/04)
      • Re: Flores Man Marc Verhaegen (10/30/04)
    • Re: Flores Man Market Theory (10/31/04)
• Little People arne97 (10/27/04)
  • Re: Little People Rich Travsky (10/27/04)
    • Re: Little People Ross Macfarlane (10/28/04)
  • Re: Little People Jack Black (10/28/04)
• Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism Rich Travsky (10/27/04)
  • Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism Marc Verhaegen (10/27/04)
    • Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism No Alternative (10/29/04)
      • Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism Raimo Kangasniemi (10/29/04)
      • Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism Marc Verhaegen (10/29/04)
      • Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism deowll (10/30/04)
  • Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism Rich Travsky (10/27/04)
    • Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism Raimo Kangasniemi (10/27/04)
      • Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism Philip Deitiker (10/28/04)
    • Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism deowll (10/30/04)
  • Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism Ross Macfarlane (10/28/04)
  • Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism Algis Kuliukas (10/28/04)
    • Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism Rich Travsky (10/28/04)
      • Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism John Roth (10/28/04)
      • Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism Rich Travsky (10/28/04)
      • Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism Su Solomon (10/28/04)
      • Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism Marc Verhaegen (10/28/04)
      • Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism deowll (10/30/04)
      • Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism Marc Verhaegen (10/28/04)
      • Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism Algis Kuliukas (10/30/04)
  • Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism Jack Black (10/28/04)
    • Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism John Wilkins (10/28/04)
      • Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism richard01 (10/28/04)
      • Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism Jack Black (10/28/04)
      • Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism deowll (10/30/04)
    • Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism Marc Verhaegen (10/28/04)
      • Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism James Michael Howard (10/28/04)
      • Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism James Michael Howard (10/28/04)
  • Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism Nick Maclaren (10/28/04)
    • Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism Nick Maclaren (10/28/04)
      • Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism Algis Kuliukas (10/30/04)
      • Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism Nick Maclaren (10/30/04)
      • Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism - Headland & Bailey Rise Again richard01 (10/30/04)
      • Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism - Headland & Bailey Rise Again deowll (10/30/04)
  • Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism Su Solomon (10/28/04)
  • Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism Su Solomon (10/29/04)
    • Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism deowll (10/30/04)
      • Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism Su Solomon (10/30/04)
      • Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism deowll (10/30/04)
  • Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism Su Solomon (10/30/04)
• New Species Of Homo At Java - *18 kya* - Link With Picture Rich Travsky (10/27/04)
  • Re: New Species Of Homo At Java - *18 kya* - Link With Picture Ross Macfarlane (10/28/04)
    • Re: New Species Of Homo At Java - *18 kya* - Link With Picture Rich Travsky (10/28/04)
      • Re: New Species Of Homo At Java - *18 kya* - Link With Picture Andrew Nowicki (10/28/04)
      • Re: New Species Of Homo At Java - *18 kya* - Link With Picture deowll (10/30/04)
      • Re: New Species Of Homo At Java - *18 kya* - Link With Picture Marc Verhaegen (10/30/04)
      • Re: New Species Of Homo At Java - *18 kya* - Link With Picture deowll (10/30/04)
  • Re: New Species Of Homo At Java - *18 kya* - Link With Picture Dunk (10/28/04)
  • Re: New Species Of Homo At Java - *18 kya* - Link With Picture deowll (10/30/04)
• Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton MrPepper11 (10/27/04)
  • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton Mekkala (10/27/04)
    • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton Mekkala (10/27/04)
    • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton jackson (10/27/04)
      • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton John Roth (10/27/04)
      • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton Dave Shipley (10/30/04)
      • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton deowll (10/30/04)
      • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton VoiceOfReason (10/28/04)
      • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton Antti Jarvi (10/29/04)
      • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton LisaKay (10/29/04)
      • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton VoiceOfReason (10/30/04)
  • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton Bill (10/27/04)
    • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton VoiceOfReason (10/30/04)
  • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton Clayton (10/27/04)
    • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton Gregory Gadow (10/28/04)
      • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton Kermit (10/29/04)
      • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton VoiceOfReason (10/30/04)
  • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton Algis Kuliukas (10/28/04)
    • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton Rich Travsky (10/28/04)
      • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton richard01 (10/28/04)
      • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton Matt Silberstein (10/28/04)
      • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton wbarwell (10/29/04)
      • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton deowll (10/30/04)
      • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton Algis Kuliukas (10/29/04)
      • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton deowll (10/30/04)
      • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton deowll (10/30/04)
    • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton Rune Børsjø (10/28/04)
      • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton Matt Silberstein (10/28/04)
      • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton Nick Maclaren (10/28/04)
      • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton Gregory Gadow (10/28/04)
      • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton Kermit (10/29/04)
      • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton deowll (10/30/04)
    • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton Andrew Nowicki (10/28/04)
      • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton Nick Maclaren (10/28/04)
      • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton deowll (10/30/04)
      • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton Nick Maclaren (10/30/04)
      • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton Marc Verhaegen (10/30/04)
    • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton Marc Verhaegen (10/28/04)
      • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton Andrew Nowicki (10/28/04)
      • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton Marc Verhaegen (10/29/04)
    • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton Kermit (10/29/04)
      • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton deowll (10/30/04)
      • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton Market Theory (10/31/04)
  • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton Clayton (10/28/04)
    • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton Rune Børsjø (10/28/04)
      • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton Clayton (10/29/04)
    • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton jackson (10/28/04)
      • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton Tedd Jacobs (10/29/04)
      • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton MrPepper11 (10/29/04)
      • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton deowll (10/30/04)
      • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton Enkidu (10/30/04)
      • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton deowll (10/30/04)
    • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton MrPepper11 (10/28/04)
      • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton Antti Jarvi (10/29/04)
      • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton Raimo Kangasniemi (10/29/04)
      • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton Nick Maclaren (10/29/04)
      • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton deowll (10/30/04)
      • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton deowll (10/30/04)
  • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton jackson (10/28/04)
    • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton Ross Macfarlane (10/29/04)
    • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton MrPepper11 (10/30/04)
    • Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton deowll (10/30/04)
• A Message from CURTIS R GREENWALD Ed Conrad (10/27/04)
• Ed Conrad's ACADEMIC CREDENTIALS Ed Conrad (10/27/04)
• [Fwd: A Fourth Law of Thermodynamics ??] Roger Bagula (10/26/04)
• Alexander's Dilemma Jim McGinn (10/25/04)
• Terrestrial monkeys Mario Petrinovich (10/25/04)
  • Re: Terrestrial monkeys Marc Verhaegen (10/25/04)
• Other human group extinction Roux Claude (10/25/04)
  • Re: Other human group extinction Ross Macfarlane (10/26/04)
    • Re: Other human group extinction firstjois (10/26/04)
  • Re: Other human group extinction Paul Crowley (10/27/04)
• Predation On Chimps Rich Travsky (10/25/04)
  • Re: Predation On Chimps Mario Petrinovich (10/25/04)
    • Re: Predation On Chimps Marc Verhaegen (10/25/04)
      • Re: Predation On Chimps Rich Travsky (10/27/04)
      • Re: Predation On Chimps Marc Verhaegen (10/27/04)
      • Re: Predation On Chimps J Moore (10/27/04)
      • Re: Predation On Chimps Marc Verhaegen (10/27/04)
      • Re: Predation On Chimps J Moore (10/27/04)
      • Re: Predation On Chimps firstjois (10/28/04)
      • Re: Predation On Chimps Philip Deitiker (10/28/04)
      • Re: Predation On Chimps Mario Petrinovich (10/29/04)
    • Re: Predation On Chimps Rich Travsky (10/27/04)
      • Re: Predation On Chimps Marc Verhaegen (10/27/04)
  • Re: Predation On Chimps Mario Petrinovich (10/25/04)
    • Re: Predation On Chimps Rich Travsky (10/27/04)
      • Re: Predation On Chimps Mario Petrinovich (10/29/04)
      • Re: Predation On Chimps J Moore (10/29/04)
  • Re: Predation On Chimps Mario Petrinovich (10/25/04)
    • Re: Predation On Chimps Marc Verhaegen (10/25/04)
      • Re: Predation On Chimps Rich Travsky (10/27/04)
      • Re: Predation On Chimps Marc Verhaegen (10/27/04)
    • Re: Predation On Chimps Rich Travsky (10/27/04)
      • Re: Predation On Chimps Michael Clark (10/27/04)
      • Re: Predation On Chimps J Moore (10/27/04)
• Dinosaurs had a highly advanced civilization ! ! ! ! Karl-Hugo Weesberg (10/25/04)
• Re: Creationism JaBrIoLeGit (10/24/04)
  • Re: Creationism - all JWs are CREATIONISTS. Moby's Grape (10/24/04)
• Cilmbing vertical surfaces Mario Petrinovich (10/24/04)
• Paper On Chimpanzee Termite Fishing And Tool Use Rich Travsky (10/24/04)
  • Re: Paper On Chimpanzee Termite Fishing And Tool Use Marc Verhaegen (10/24/04)
  • Re: Paper On Chimpanzee Termite Fishing And Tool Use Philip Deitiker (10/24/04)
    • Re: Paper On Chimpanzee Termite Fishing And Tool Use firstjois (10/24/04)
      • Re: Paper On Chimpanzee Termite Fishing And Tool Use Philip Deitiker (10/24/04)
      • Re: Paper On Chimpanzee Termite Fishing And Tool Use ejudy (10/25/04)
    • Re: Paper On Chimpanzee Termite Fishing And Tool Use Marc Verhaegen (10/26/04)
• THANK YOU ! Ed Conrad (10/22/04)
• MSA tools in reef c 125 ka Marc Verhaegen (10/21/04)
  • Re: MSA tools in reef c 125 ka Rich Travsky (10/24/04)
    • Re: MSA tools in reef c 125 ka Marc Verhaegen (10/24/04)
      • Re: MSA tools in reef c 125 ka richard01 (10/25/04)
      • erectus did not hunt (Re: MSA tools in reef c 125 ka Marc Verhaegen (10/25/04)
      • Re: erectus did hunt (Re: MSA tools in reef c 125 ka Rich Travsky (10/27/04)
      • Re: erectus did hunt (Re: MSA tools in reef c 125 ka Marc Verhaegen (10/27/04)
      • Re: MSA tools in reef c 125 ka firstjois (10/26/04)
      • Re: MSA tools in reef c 125 ka Rich Travsky (10/27/04)
      • Re: MSA tools in reef c 125 ka richard01 (10/28/04)
      • butchering (Re: MSA tools in reef c 125 ka Marc Verhaegen (10/29/04)
      • Re: MSA tools in reef c 125 ka Rich Travsky (10/27/04)
      • Re: MSA tools in reef c 125 ka Marc Verhaegen (10/27/04)
• Humans Have Far Fewer Genes Than Thought Rich Travsky (10/20/04)
• bipedality & disappearing forests Marc Verhaegen (10/20/04)
  • Re: bipedality & disappearing forests Marc Verhaegen (10/20/04)
• Cameron & Groves latest book positive about AAH Algis Kuliukas (10/20/04)
  • Re: Cameron & Groves latest book positive about AAH Pauline M Ross (10/20/04)
    • Re: Cameron & Groves latest book positive about AAH Algis Kuliukas (10/21/04)
      • Re: Cameron & Groves latest book positive about AAH firstjois (10/23/04)
      • Re: Cameron & Groves latest book positive about AAH Algis Kuliukas (10/23/04)
      • Re: Cameron & Groves latest book positive about AAH firstjois (10/24/04)
      • Evidennce, and scientific palatability Algis Kuliukas (10/24/04)
      • Re: Evidennce, and scientific palatability Michael Clark (10/24/04)
      • Re: Evidence, and scientific palatability Marc Verhaegen (10/24/04)
      • Re: Evidence, and scientific palatability J Moore (10/24/04)
      • Re: Evidence, and scientific palatability Marc Verhaegen (10/24/04)
      • Re: Evidence, and scientific palatability J Moore (10/24/04)
      • Re: Evidence, and scientific palatability firstjois (10/24/04)
      • Re: Evidence, and scientific palatability Algis Kuliukas (10/25/04)
      • Re: Evidence, and scientific palatability Jason Eshleman (10/25/04)
      • Re: Evidence, and scientific palatability J Moore (10/25/04)
      • moore blabla (Re: Evidence, and scientific palatability Marc Verhaegen (10/25/04)
      • Re: Evidence, and scientific palatability Marc Verhaegen (10/25/04)
      • Re: Evidence, and scientific palatability Rich Travsky (10/27/04)
      • Re: Evidence, and scientific palatability J Moore (10/27/04)
      • We swim better than apes because we're bipedal (Re: Evidennce, and scientific palatability Marc Verhaegen (10/27/04)
      • Re: We swim better than apes because we're bipedal (Re: Evidennce, and scientific palatability Su Solomon (10/28/04)
      • Re: We swim better than apes because we're bipedal (Re: Evidennce, and scientific palatability Marc Verhaegen (10/29/04)
      • Re: We swim better than apes because we're kangaroos firstjois (10/29/04)
      • Re: We swim better than apes because we're kangaroos J Moore (10/29/04)
      • Re: We swim better than apes because we're kangaroos firstjois (10/29/04)
      • Re: We swim better than apes because we're kangaroos J Moore (10/29/04)
      • Re: We swim better than apes because we're kangaroos Su Solomon (10/30/04)
      • Re: We swim better than apes because we're kangaroos Su Solomon (10/30/04)
      • Re: We swim better than apes because we're kangaroos J Moore (10/30/04)
  • Re: Cameron & Groves latest book positive about AAH John Wilkins (10/20/04)
    • Re: Cameron & Groves latest book positive about AAH Philip Deitiker (10/20/04)
      • Deitiker never got the point (Re: Cameron & Groves latest book positive about AAH Marc Verhaegen (10/20/04)
      • Re: Cameron & Groves latest book positive about AAH richard01 (10/24/04)
      • Re: Cameron & Groves latest book positive about AAH Marc Verhaegen (10/24/04)
  • Re: Cameron & Groves latest book positive about AAH Rick Wagler (10/25/04)
    • Re: Cameron & Groves latest book positive about AAH Algis Kuliukas (10/25/04)
      • Re: Cameron & Groves latest book positive about AAH Rich Travsky (10/27/04)
• NOVA show *Neanderthals on Trial*; Stonethrowing theory applied Archimedes Plutonium (10/20/04)
  • Re: NOVA show *Neanderthals on Trial*; Stonethrowing theory applied pete (10/20/04)
  • Re: NOVA show *Neanderthals on Trial*; Stonethrowing theory applied Archimedes Plutonium (10/20/04)
    • Re: NOVA show *Neanderthals on Trial*; Stonethrowing theory applied Larry Caldwell (10/29/04)
      • Re: NOVA show *Neanderthals on Trial*; Stonethrowing theory applied Archimedes Plutonium (10/30/04)
      • Re: NOVA show *Neanderthals on Trial*; Stonethrowing theory applied Larry Caldwell (10/30/04)
      • Re: NOVA show *Neanderthals on Trial*; Stonethrowing theory applied Archimedes Plutonium (10/30/04)
      • Re: NOVA show *Neanderthals on Trial*; Stonethrowing theory applied Larry Caldwell (10/30/04)
  • Re: NOVA show *Neanderthals on Trial*; Stonethrowing theory applied The Green Troll (10/20/04)
  • Re: NOVA show *Neanderthals on Trial*; Stonethrowing theory applied Archimedes Plutonium (10/25/04)
    • Re: NOVA show *Neanderthals on Trial*; Stonethrowing theory applied Sailcat (10/25/04)
      • Re: NOVA show *Neanderthals on Trial*; Stonethrowing theory applied firstjois (10/26/04)
      • Re: NOVA show *Neanderthals on Trial*; Stonethrowing theory applied Philip Deitiker (10/26/04)
      • Re: NOVA show *Neanderthals on Trial*; Stonethrowing theory applied enm (10/26/04)
      • Re: NOVA show *Neanderthals on Trial*; Stonethrowing theory applied firstjois (10/26/04)
      • Re: NOVA show *Neanderthals on Trial*; Stonethrowing theory applied Philip Deitiker (10/26/04)
      • Re: NOVA show *Neanderthals on Trial*; Stonethrowing theory applied firstjois (10/26/04)
      • Re: NOVA show *Neanderthals on Trial*; Stonethrowing theory applied Archimedes Plutonium (10/26/04)
• RRRRRRRRRRRRRR is Us Ed Conrad (10/19/04)
  • Re: RRRRRRRRRRRRRR is Us Ed Conrad (10/20/04)
• Re: Handaxes - A Brand New Theory mikelist (10/19/04)
  • Re: Handaxes - A Brand New Theory Bob Keeter (10/20/04)
• Re: OT 'bout that time again Lee Olsen (10/19/04)
  • Re: OT 'bout that time again pete (10/19/04)
    • Re: OT 'bout that time again Philip Deitiker (10/19/04)
    • Re: OT 'bout that time again Bob Keeter (10/20/04)
      • Re: OT 'bout that time again pete (10/20/04)
• Human Water Needs Less Than Thought Rich Travsky (10/18/04)
• Cranial Sutures Evon (10/18/04)
  • Re: Cranial Sutures firstjois (10/20/04)
• AAT obsolete Marc Verhaegen (10/18/04)
• testosterone inhibits lipolysis of subcutaneous fat... James Michael Howard (10/18/04)
• Goodall Still Going Strong - Interview Rich Travsky (10/18/04)
• Was the "mitochondrial Eve" a real person? Raphael Goubet (10/17/04)
  • Re: Was the "mitochondrial Eve" a real person? James Michael Howard (10/17/04)
  • Re: Was the "mitochondrial Eve" a real person? r norman (10/17/04)
  • Re: Was the "mitochondrial Eve" a real person? Philip Deitiker (10/17/04)
• McNeill Alexander on bipedality in J.Anatomy Marc Verhaegen (10/17/04)
• Relaxed Molecular Clock Gives Better Fit With Fossil Record Rich Travsky (10/17/04)
  • Re: Relaxed Molecular Clock Gives Better Fit With Fossil Record Philip Deitiker (10/17/04)
• Journal of Human Evolution, vol. 47, no. 3, Sept., 2004: Table of Contents Phillip Bigelow (10/17/04)
• chachapoya Jabriol (10/16/04)
• antiAATer has become AATer Marc Verhaegen (10/16/04)
  • Re: antiAATer has become AATer Algis Kuliukas (10/17/04)
    • Re: antiAATer has become AATer Marc Verhaegen (10/17/04)
    • Re: antiAATer hasn't become AATer Rich Travsky (10/18/04)
  • Re: antiAATer hasn't become AATer Rich Travsky (10/18/04)
    • Re: antiAATer hasn't become AATer Marc Verhaegen (10/18/04)
      • Re: antiAATer hasn't become AATer Rich Travsky (10/24/04)
• J.Anat. on bipedalism Marc Verhaegen (10/16/04)
• The Indian Trust disaster (Re: a form of affirmative action? Yuri Kuchinsky (10/15/04)
  • Re: The Indian Trust disaster (Re: a form of affirmative action? jitney (10/16/04)
    • Re: The Indian Trust disaster (Re: a form of affirmative action? Schlau (10/18/04)
    • Re: The Indian Trust disaster (Re: a form of affirmative action? Yuri Kuchinsky (10/20/04)
• Subcutaneous fat and testosterone... James Michael Howard (10/15/04)
  • Re: Subcutaneous fat and testosterone... Marc Verhaegen (10/15/04)
    • Re: Subcutaneous fat and testosterone... James Michael Howard (10/15/04)
      • Re: Subcutaneous fat and testosterone... Marc Verhaegen (10/16/04)
• Archy & AE courses run Mikey Brass (10/15/04)
• moore blabla Mario Petrinovich (10/15/04)
• Re: Stedman's Paper vs. Perry's Letter, Who's Right? Philip Deitiker (10/15/04)
• INTERNET ABUSE -- Was WORLD MYSTERY FORUM Ed Conrad (10/14/04)
  • Re: INTERNET ABUSE -- Was WORLD MYSTERY FORUM Durk van Veen (10/15/04)
  • Re: INTERNET ABUSE -- Was WORLD MYSTERY FORUM Cardinal Chunder (10/15/04)
• Re: 10 PRINCIPLES OF HUMANISATION narvikdesi (10/14/04)
  • Re: 10 PRINCIPLES OF HUMANISATION Joseph H (10/14/04)
• WORLD MYSTERY FORUM. Ed Conrad (10/14/04)
  • Re: WORLD MYSTERY FORUM. Mark (10/14/04)
  • Re: WORLD MYSTERY FORUM. European investor (10/29/04)
• Can You Please Help Me With these Questions SuperNerdGirl (10/13/04)
• MYH16 Inactivation Pushed Back To *5.3 mya* Rich Travsky (10/13/04)
  • if MYH16 inactivation is c 5 Ma, all apiths fall outside human evolution :-) (was Re: MYH16 Inactivation Pushed Back To *5.3 mya* Marc Verhaegen (10/13/04)
    • Re: if MYH16 inactivation is c 5 Ma, all apiths fall outside human evolution :-) (was Re: MYH16 Inactivation Pushed Back To *5.3 mya* Rich Travsky (10/13/04)
      • Re: if MYH16 inactivation is c 5 Ma, all apiths fall outside human evolution :-) (was Re: MYH16 Inactivation Pushed Back To *5.3 mya* Marc Verhaegen (10/13/04)
      • Re: if MYH16 inactivation is c 5 Ma, all apiths fall outside human evolution :-) (was Re: MYH16 Inactivation Pushed Back To *5.3 mya* Rich Travsky (10/18/04)
      • Re: if MYH16 inactivation is c 5 Ma, all apiths fall outside human evolution :-) (was Re: MYH16 Inactivation Pushed Back To *5.3 mya* Philip Deitiker (10/18/04)
      • Re: if MYH16 inactivation is c 5 Ma, all apiths fall outside human evolution :-) (was Re: MYH16 Inactivation Pushed Back To *5.3 mya* Marc Verhaegen (10/18/04)
      • Re: if MYH16 inactivation is c 5 Ma, all apiths fall outside human evolution :-) (was Re: MYH16 Inactivation Pushed Back To *5.3 mya* Marc Verhaegen (10/18/04)
      • Re: if MYH16 inactivation is c 5 Ma, all apiths fall outside human evolution :-) (was Re: MYH16 Inactivation Pushed Back To *5.3 mya* Rich Travsky (10/24/04)
      • Re: if MYH16 inactivation is c 5 Ma, all apiths fall outside human evolution :-) (was Re: MYH16 Inactivation Pushed Back To *5.3 mya* Marc Verhaegen (10/24/04)
      • Re: if MYH16 inactivation is c 5 Ma, all apiths fall outside human evolution :-) (was Re: MYH16 Inactivation Pushed Back To *5.3 mya* Algis Kuliukas (10/25/04)
      • Re: if MYH16 inactivation is c 5 Ma, all apiths fall outside human evolution :-) (was Re: MYH16 Inactivation Pushed Back To *5.3 mya* Marc Verhaegen (10/26/04)
      • Re: if MYH16 inactivation is c 5 Ma, all apiths fall outside human evolution :-) (was Re: MYH16 Inactivation Pushed Back To *5.3 mya* Algis Kuliukas (10/27/04)
      • Re: if MYH16 inactivation is c 5 Ma, all apiths fall outside human evolution :-) (was Re: MYH16 Inactivation Pushed Back To *5.3 mya* Michael Clark (10/27/04)
      • Re: if MYH16 inactivation is c 5 Ma, all apiths fall outside human evolution :-) (was Re: MYH16 Inactivation Pushed Back To *5.3 mya* Marc Verhaegen (10/27/04)
      • Re: if MYH16 inactivation is c 5 Ma, all apiths fall outside human evolution :-) (was Re: MYH16 Inactivation Pushed Back To *5.3 mya* J Moore (10/27/04)
      • Re: if MYH16 inactivation is c 5 Ma, all apiths fall outside human evolution :-) (was Re: MYH16 Inactivation Pushed Back To *5.3 mya* Rich Travsky (10/27/04)
      • Re: if MYH16 inactivation is c 5 Ma, all apiths fall outside human evolution :-) (was Re: MYH16 Inactivation Pushed Back To *5.3 mya* Marc Verhaegen (10/27/04)
      • Re: if MYH16 inactivation is c 5 Ma, all apiths fall outside human evolution :-) (was Re: MYH16 Inactivation Pushed Back To *5.3 mya* firstjois (10/24/04)
      • Re: if MYH16 inactivation is c 5 Ma, all apiths fall outside human evolution :-) (was Re: MYH16 Inactivation Pushed Back To *5.3 mya* Philip Deitiker (10/24/04)
      • Re: if MYH16 inactivation is c 5 Ma, all apiths fall outside human evolution :-) (was Re: MYH16 Inactivation Pushed Back To *5.3 mya* Marc Verhaegen (10/24/04)
      • Re: if MYH16 inactivation is c 5 Ma, all apiths fall outside human evolution :-) (was Re: MYH16 Inactivation Pushed Back To *5.3 mya* firstjois (10/24/04)
  • Re: MYH16 Inactivation Pushed Back To *5.3 mya* John Roth (10/14/04)
    • Re: MYH16 Inactivation Pushed Back To *5.3 mya* Rich Travsky (10/14/04)
      • Re: MYH16 Inactivation Pushed Back To *5.3 mya* John Roth (10/14/04)
      • Re: MYH16 Inactivation Pushed Back To *5.3 mya* Marc Verhaegen (10/16/04)
    • Re: MYH16 Inactivation Pushed Back To *5.3 mya* Marc Verhaegen (10/14/04)
• a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Yuri Kuchinsky (10/12/04)
  • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Erik A. Mattila (10/12/04)
    • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! pwilson (10/14/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Tom McDonald (10/14/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! pwilson (10/14/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Tom McDonald (10/14/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! pwilson (10/14/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Erik A. Mattila (10/14/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! pwilson (10/15/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Erik A. Mattila (10/15/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! pwilson (10/15/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Erik A. Mattila (10/15/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! pwilson (10/16/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Peter Ashby (10/16/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! pwilson (10/16/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Peter Ashby (10/17/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! pwilson (10/17/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Erik A. Mattila (10/14/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! pwilson (10/15/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Erik A. Mattila (10/15/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! pwilson (10/15/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Erik A. Mattila (10/15/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! pwilson (10/16/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Seppo Renfors (10/15/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! pwilson (10/15/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Tom McDonald (10/15/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Seppo Renfors (10/16/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Tom McDonald (10/16/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Seppo Renfors (10/18/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Tom McDonald (10/19/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Seppo Renfors (10/18/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Erik A. Mattila (10/15/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Seppo Renfors (10/16/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Erik A. Mattila (10/16/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Lee Olsen (10/16/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Seppo Renfors (10/18/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! richard01 (10/18/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Seppo Renfors (10/19/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Erik A. Mattila (10/18/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Seppo Renfors (10/19/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Floyd L. Davidson (10/16/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Seppo Renfors (10/18/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Erik A. Mattila (10/18/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Seppo Renfors (10/19/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! pwilson (10/20/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Yuri Kuchinsky (10/20/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! pwilson (10/22/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Seppo Renfors (10/21/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! pwilson (10/22/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Lee Olsen (10/19/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Seppo Renfors (10/20/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Floyd L. Davidson (10/20/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Seppo Renfors (10/21/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Lee Olsen (10/21/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Seppo Renfors (10/22/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Floyd L. Davidson (10/22/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Lee Olsen (10/23/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Seppo Renfors (10/26/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Lee Olsen (10/19/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Seppo Renfors (10/20/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Floyd L. Davidson (10/20/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Lee Olsen (10/21/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Seppo Renfors (10/22/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Lee Olsen (10/23/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Seppo Renfors (10/26/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Tom McDonald (10/27/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Seppo Renfors (10/27/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Tom McDonald (10/27/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Seppo Renfors (10/28/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Tom McDonald (10/29/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Philip Deitiker (10/14/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! pwilson (10/14/04)
    • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Yuri Kuchinsky (10/15/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Erik A. Mattila (10/15/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Erik A. Mattila (10/15/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Lee Olsen (10/16/04)
  • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Lee Olsen (10/14/04)
    • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! lisa dillon (10/14/04)
  • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Lee Olsen (10/17/04)
    • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Erik A. Mattila (10/18/04)
  • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Lee Olsen (10/18/04)
    • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Yuri Kuchinsky (10/20/04)
  • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Floyd L. Davidson (10/23/04)
    • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Tom McDonald (10/23/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Doug Weller (10/24/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Ross Macfarlane (10/25/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Floyd L. Davidson (10/25/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Hyperoglyphe (10/25/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Erik A. Mattila (10/26/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Doug Weller (10/29/04)
      • Re: a form of affirmative action? (Re: oldest American skull found! Seppo Renfors (10/26/04)
• DNA on the fly!! Bob Keeter (10/09/04)
• Homo erectus, sinodonts, Milton Wolpoff richard01 (10/08/04)
• Re: Human Origins Help? Ralph E Kelley (10/08/04)
  • Re: Human Origins Help? Marc Verhaegen (10/08/04)
• New Species Of Great Ape? Rich Travsky (10/07/04)
  • Re: New Species Of Great Ape? John Wilkins (10/07/04)
    • Re: New Species Of Great Ape? J Moore (10/08/04)
    • Re: New Species Of Great Ape? Philip Deitiker (10/08/04)
      • Re: New Species Of Great Ape? Lorenzo L. Love (10/08/04)
      • Re: New Species Of Great Ape? Phillip Bigelow (10/13/04)
    • Re: New Species Of Great Ape? Ross Macfarlane (10/08/04)
      • Re: New Species Of Great Ape? Rick Wagler (10/08/04)
      • Re: New Species Of Great Ape? Ross Macfarlane (10/11/04)
      • Re: New Species Of Great Ape? Jason Eshleman (10/11/04)
      • Re: New Species Of Great Ape? Rick Wagler (10/11/04)
      • Re: New Species Of Great Ape? Jason Eshleman (10/11/04)
      • Re: New Species Of Great Ape? Algis Kuliukas (10/13/04)
      • Re: New Species Of Great Ape? richard01 (10/16/04)
• Climate Change And Human Pressure Behind Megafauna Extinctions Rich Travsky (10/07/04)
  • Re: Climate Change And Human Pressure Behind Megafauna Extinctions richard01 (10/08/04)
• Re: Chimps Don't Just Use Tools, They Use Toolkits (And a touch of bipedal behavior) richard01 (10/07/04)
• Fish - PIE - Linguistic Help Please richard01 (10/07/04)
  • Re: Fish - PIE - Linguistic Help Please richard01 (10/08/04)
• Mega fauna vs Human Hunter or not firstjois (10/06/04)
  • Re: Mega fauna vs Human Hunter or not Ross Macfarlane (10/07/04)
    • Re: Mega fauna vs Human Hunter or not firstjois (10/07/04)
      • Re: Mega fauna vs Human Hunter or not Ross Macfarlane (10/08/04)
      • Re: Mega fauna vs Human Hunter or not firstjois (10/08/04)
  • Re: Mega fauna vs Human Hunter or not richard01 (10/07/04)
• Cavalli-Sforza Supports AAT richard01 (10/06/04)
  • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Supports AAT Pauline M Ross (10/06/04)
    • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Supports AAT Marc Verhaegen (10/06/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Supports AAT Pauline M Ross (10/06/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Supports AAT Marc Verhaegen (10/06/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Supports AAT richard01 (10/07/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Supports AAT Marc Verhaegen (10/08/04)
    • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Supports AAT Bob Keeter (10/08/04)
    • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Supports AAT Rich Travsky (10/13/04)
  • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Supports AAT Marc Verhaegen (10/06/04)
  • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Supports AAT Ross Macfarlane (10/07/04)
    • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Supports AAT richard01 (10/07/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Supports AAT Su Solomon (10/07/04)
    • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Supports AAT John Roth (10/07/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Supports AAT Marc Verhaegen (10/08/04)
  • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Supports AAT Rick Wagler (10/07/04)
    • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Supports AAT richard01 (10/07/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Supports AAT Su Solomon (10/07/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Supports AAT richard01 (10/08/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Supports AAT Algis Kuliukas (10/11/04)
  • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Supports AAT Paul Crowley (10/07/04)
    • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Supports AAT Mario Petrinovich (10/08/04)
    • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Supports AAT richard01 (10/08/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Supports AAT Algis Kuliukas (10/09/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Supports AAT Paul Crowley (10/09/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Supports AAT Algis Kuliukas (10/11/04)
  • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Supports AAT Larry Caldwell (10/12/04)
  • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT Rich Travsky (10/13/04)
    • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT firstjois (10/13/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT richard01 (10/14/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT firstjois (10/14/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT richard01 (10/15/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT firstjois (10/15/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT J Moore (10/15/04)
      • moore blabla (Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT Marc Verhaegen (10/15/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT (Diet) richard01 (10/16/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT (Diet) J Moore (10/17/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT (Diet) Marc Verhaegen (10/17/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT (Diet) richard01 (10/17/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT (Diet) J Moore (10/17/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT (Diet) Ross Macfarlane (10/18/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT (Diet) J Moore (10/18/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT (Diet) Rich Travsky (10/18/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT (Diet) Pauline M Ross (10/18/04)
      • SC fat (Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT (Diet) Marc Verhaegen (10/18/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT (Diet) Rich Travsky (10/24/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT (Diet) firstjois (10/24/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT (Diet) J Moore (10/24/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT (Diet) Marc Verhaegen (10/24/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT (Diet) J Moore (10/25/04)
      • fat chimps?? (Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT (Diet) Marc Verhaegen (10/25/04)
      • Re: fat chimps?? (Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT (Diet) J Moore (10/25/04)
      • Re: fat chimps?? (Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT (Diet) Marc Verhaegen (10/26/04)
      • Re: fat chimps?? (Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT (Diet) Paul Crowley (10/26/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT (Diet) firstjois (10/24/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT (Diet) richard01 (10/18/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT (Diet) Rick Wagler (10/18/04)
      • SC fat (Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT (Diet) Marc Verhaegen (10/18/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT (Diet) Rich Travsky (10/24/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT (Diet) Marc Verhaegen (10/18/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT (Diet) Rich Travsky (10/18/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT (Diet) Rich Travsky (10/18/04)
      • savanna believers' answers... (Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT Marc Verhaegen (10/15/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT Rich Travsky (10/18/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT richard01 (10/18/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT firstjois (10/20/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT Rich Travsky (10/24/04)
      • WT-15k = marsh-dweller (Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT Marc Verhaegen (10/24/04)
      • Re: WT-15k = marsh-dweller (Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT richard01 (10/25/04)
      • Re: WT-15k = marsh-dweller (Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT firstjois (10/25/04)
      • Re: WT-15k = marsh-dweller (Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT firstjois (10/25/04)
      • Re: WT-15k = marsh-dweller (Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT Marc Verhaegen (10/25/04)
      • Re: WT-15k = marsh-dweller (Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT Rich Travsky (10/27/04)
      • Re: WT-15k = marsh-dweller (Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT Marc Verhaegen (10/27/04)
      • Re: WT-15k = marsh-dweller (Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT Michael Clark (10/27/04)
      • Re: WT-15k = marsh-dweller (Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT Philip Deitiker (10/25/04)
      • Re: WT-15k = marsh-dweller (Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT Marc Verhaegen (10/26/04)
      • Re: WT-15k ^=marsh-dweller (Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT Rich Travsky (10/27/04)
      • Re: WT-15k ^=marsh-dweller (Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT Marc Verhaegen (10/27/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT firstjois (10/24/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT Rich Travsky (10/27/04)
      • human running is expensive (Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT Marc Verhaegen (10/18/04)
      • Human running is something even children can do Re: human running is expensive (Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT Rich Travsky (10/24/04)
      • Re: Human running is something even children can do Re: human running is expensive (Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT Marc Verhaegen (10/24/04)
      • Re: Human running is something even children can do Re: human running is expensive (Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT J Moore (10/24/04)
      • Re: Human running is something even children can do Re: human running is expensive (Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT Rich Travsky (10/27/04)
      • Re: Human running is something even children can do Re: human running is expensive (Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT Marc Verhaegen (10/27/04)
      • Re: Human running is something even children can do Re: human running is expensive (Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT firstjois (10/24/04)
    • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT richard01 (10/14/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT Marc Verhaegen (10/14/04)
      • Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT Rich Travsky (10/18/04)
• Re: Atheists dying Blaise Pascal (10/06/04)
  • Re: Atheists dying Dr. Flonkenstein (10/06/04)
  • Re: Atheists dying -- THE "ONLY GOD" Libertarius (10/06/04)
  • Re: Atheists dying Ross (10/06/04)
  • Re: Atheists dying Karl Johanson (10/07/04)
    • Re: Atheists dying richard01 (10/07/04)
    • Re: Atheists dying Torkel Franzen (10/08/04)
  • Re: Atheists dying John Baker (10/10/04)
  • Re: Atheists dying George Cox (10/10/04)
• Lice Evolution May Reflect sapiens/erectus Contact Rich Travsky (10/05/04)
  • Re: Lice Evolution May Reflect sapiens/erectus Contact firstjois (10/05/04)
    • Re: Lice Evolution May Reflect sapiens/erectus Contact richard01 (10/06/04)
  • Link To Full Paper Re: Lice Evolution May Reflect sapiens/erectus Contact Rich Travsky (10/10/04)
    • Re: Link To Full Paper Re: Lice Evolution May Reflect sapiens/erectus Contact firstjois (10/11/04)
      • Re: Link To Full Paper Re: Lice Evolution May Reflect sapiens/erectus Contact richard01 (10/12/04)
      • Re: Link To Full Paper Re: Lice Evolution May Reflect sapiens/erectus Contact firstjois (10/12/04)
• Re: Words of Wisdom (Pseudos, Note) mikelist (10/05/04)
• Re: Was Atlantis destroyed by gene-manipulated mutant beasts? Jabriol (10/04/04)
• Dinosaurs were fluffy pets like cats! Brian Raab (10/04/04)
• Dinosaurs were fluffy pets like cats! Brian Raab (10/04/04)
• Erectus Brain Growth Closer To Apes Rich Travsky (10/04/04)
  • Re: Erectus Brain Growth Closer To Apes John Roth (10/04/04)
  • Re: Erectus Brain Growth Closer To Apes richard01 (10/04/04)
• Re: Bipedalism in different substrates Rich Travsky (10/03/04)
  • Re: Bipedalism in different substrates firstjois (10/04/04)
    • Re: Bipedalism in different substrates richard01 (10/04/04)
      • Re: Bipedalism in different substrates J Moore (10/04/04)
  • Re: Bipedalism in different substrates Marc Verhaegen (10/04/04)
    • Re: Bipedalism in different substrates J Moore (10/05/04)
      • Re: Bipedalism in different substrates Marc Verhaegen (10/05/04)
      • Re: Bipedalism in different substrates J Moore (10/05/04)
      • Nancy Tanner & AAT (Re: Bipedalism in different substrates Marc Verhaegen (10/05/04)
      • Re: Nancy Tanner & AAT (Re: Bipedalism in different substrates J Moore (10/05/04)
      • Re: Nancy Tanner & AAT (Re: Bipedalism in different substrates Marc Verhaegen (10/06/04)
    • Re: Bipedalism in different substrates Rich Travsky (10/13/04)
• Re: fire &/or coast? Rich Travsky (10/03/04)
• Re: Large Brains Evolved For Social Competition Rich Travsky (10/03/04)
• Re: bipedal bears (Re: What is the Aquatic theory? Rich Travsky (10/03/04)
  • Re: bipedal bears (Re: What is the Aquatic theory? firstjois (10/04/04)
    • Re: bipedal bears (Re: What is the Aquatic theory? richard01 (10/04/04)
  • Re: bipedal bears (Re: What is the Aquatic theory? Marc Verhaegen (10/04/04)
    • Re: bipedal bears (Re: What is the Aquatic theory? Rich Travsky (10/13/04)
      • Re: bipedal bears (Re: What is the Aquatic theory? Marc Verhaegen (10/13/04)
• Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. Roshard Davis (10/03/04)
  • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. Michael Clark (10/04/04)
    • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. Ross Macfarlane (10/04/04)
      • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. Michael Clark (10/04/04)
      • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. Ross Macfarlane (10/05/04)
      • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. firstjois (10/05/04)
      • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. ejudy (10/05/04)
      • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. Ross Macfarlane (10/05/04)
      • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. firstjois (10/06/04)
      • Re: OT Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. firstjois (10/06/04)
      • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. Mario Petrinovich (10/08/04)
      • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. Philip Deitiker (10/08/04)
      • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. firstjois (10/09/04)
      • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. Philip Deitiker (10/09/04)
      • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. firstjois (10/09/04)
      • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. firstjois (10/09/04)
      • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. Ross Macfarlane (10/11/04)
    • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. Roshard Davis (10/04/04)
      • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. Michael Clark (10/04/04)
      • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. J Moore (10/05/04)
      • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. Philip Deitiker (10/05/04)
    • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. Alan McIntire (10/11/04)
  • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. Philip Deitiker (10/04/04)
    • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. Roshard Davis (10/04/04)
      • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. Michael Clark (10/05/04)
      • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. Philip Deitiker (10/05/04)
      • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. firstjois (10/05/04)
      • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. Philip Deitiker (10/06/04)
      • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. ejudy (10/06/04)
      • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. Philip Deitiker (10/06/04)
      • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. firstjois (10/07/04)
      • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. Bob Keeter (10/08/04)
      • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. ejudy (10/06/04)
      • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. firstjois (10/07/04)
      • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. ejudy (10/07/04)
      • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. firstjois (10/08/04)
      • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. ejudy (10/08/04)
      • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. Roshard Davis (10/07/04)
      • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. Philip Deitiker (10/07/04)
      • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. Michael Clark (10/07/04)
      • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. Yuri Kuchinsky (10/06/04)
  • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. J Moore (10/04/04)
    • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. Roshard Davis (10/04/04)
      • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. J Moore (10/04/04)
      • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. Ross Macfarlane (10/05/04)
  • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. zolota (10/04/04)
    • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. richard01 (10/04/04)
  • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. Phillip Bigelow (10/05/04)
  • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. firstjois (10/05/04)
    • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. J Moore (10/05/04)
      • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. firstjois (10/06/04)
    • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. Bob Keeter (10/08/04)
  • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. P.Comm (10/07/04)
    • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. Phillip Bigelow (10/08/04)
      • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. J Moore (10/08/04)
      • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. Mario Petrinovich (10/08/04)
      • Re: Anyone with Degrees in Anthropology. firstjois (10/09/04)
• TOBS: WDDK Jabriol (10/03/04)
  • Re: TOBS: WDDK John Ings (10/03/04)
    • Re: TOBS: WDDK Aardvark J. Bandersnatch, MP (10/03/04)
    • Re: TOBS: WDDK Spartacus (10/03/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK John Ings (10/03/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK Spartacus (10/03/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK John Ings (10/03/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK Spartacus (10/04/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK Mona Lisa (10/04/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK Brett Aubrey (10/04/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK Mona Lisa (10/05/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK John Harshman (10/05/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK Mona Lisa (10/05/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK John Harshman (10/05/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK Mona Lisa (10/05/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK Brett Aubrey (10/05/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK Mona Lisa (10/05/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK Jabriol (10/05/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK John Harshman (10/05/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK Joan of Spark (10/05/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK Joan of Spark (10/05/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK Brett Aubrey (10/05/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK Brett Aubrey (10/05/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK John Harshman (10/05/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK Joan of Spark (10/05/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK Jabriol (10/05/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK - Jabriol the drop-out Joan of Spark (10/05/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK - Jabriol the drop-out Jabriol (10/06/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK - Jabriol the drop-out and welfare recipient Lupe Lu (10/06/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK - Jabriol the drop-out and welfare recipient Jabriol (10/07/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK Brett Aubrey (10/05/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK John Harshman (10/05/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK Brett Aubrey (10/05/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK John Harshman (10/05/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK Elmer Bataitis (10/05/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK Jabriol (10/05/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK Joan of Spark (10/05/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK John Ings (10/04/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK Spartacus (10/05/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK Mark (10/05/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK John Ings (10/05/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK Spartacus (10/05/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK John Ings (10/06/04)
    • Re: TOBS: WDDK - creationists Mona Lisa (10/03/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK - creationists John Ings (10/03/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK - creationists Jabriol (10/04/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK - creationists John Ings (10/04/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK - creationists Spartacus (10/03/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK - creationists Jabriol (10/04/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK - creationists Brett Aubrey (10/04/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK - creationists Jabriol (10/04/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK - creationists Brett Aubrey (10/04/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK - comments from Porter Kier and Karl Popper, Norman Cousins on SM Jabriol (10/05/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK - comments from Porter Kier and Karl Popper, Norman Cousins on SM Mark (10/05/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK - comments from Porter Kier and Karl Popper, Norman Cousins on SM Jabriol (10/05/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK - creationists Aardvark J. Bandersnatch, MP (10/05/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK - creationists - Jabriol is a TROLL Mona Lisa (10/04/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK - creationists - windsong@heartoftn.net tries to disrupt yet another thread. Jabriol (10/04/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK - creationists - windsong@heartoftn.net tries to disrupt yet another thread. Mona Lisa (10/05/04)
    • Re: TOBS: WDDK Jabriol (10/05/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK John Ings (10/06/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK Jabriol (10/06/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK John Ings (10/06/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK Jabriol (10/06/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK John Ings (10/06/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK Jabriol (10/07/04)
      • Re: TOBS: WDDK John Ings (10/08/04)
  • Re: WDDK EarlCox (10/03/04)
    • Re: WDDK Jabriol (10/04/04)
      • Re: WDDK - Jabriol is a CREATIONIST Mona Lisa (10/04/04)
      • Re: WDDK - Jabriol is a CREATIONIST Jabriol (10/04/04)
      • Re: WDDK - Jabriol is a CREATIONIST Mona Lisa (10/05/04)
      • Re: WDDK - Jabriol is a CREATIONIST EarlCox (10/05/04)
      • Re: WDDK - Jabriol is a CREATIONIST Mona Lisa (10/05/04)
      • Re: WDDK Jabriol (10/05/04)
      • Re: WDDK & the earth was seeded? Joan of Spark (10/05/04)
      • Re: WDDK EarlCox (10/06/04)
• Archaeology & Egypt courses Mikey Brass (10/03/04)
• Re: Fire, Food and Fish - Homo erectus didn't need fire to cook Su Solomon (10/03/04)
  • Re: Fire, Food and Fish - Homo erectus didn't need fire to cook Rich Travsky (10/03/04)
  • Re: Fire, Food and Fish - Homo erectus didn't need fire to cook Rich Travsky (10/03/04)
    • Re: Fire, Food and Fish - Homo erectus didn't need fire to cook Marc Verhaegen (10/04/04)
      • Re: Fire, Food and Fish - Homo erectus didn't need fire to cook J Moore (10/05/04)
      • moore blabla (Re: Fire, Food and Fish - Homo erectus didn't need fire to cook Marc Verhaegen (10/05/04)
      • Re: moore blabla (Re: Fire, Food and Fish - Homo erectus didn't need fire to cook J Moore (10/05/04)
      • Re: moore blabla (Re: Fire, Food and Fish - Homo erectus didn't need fire to cook Philip Deitiker (10/05/04)
      • Re: moore blabla (Re: Fire, Food and Fish - Homo erectus didn't need fire to cook Marc Verhaegen (10/05/04)
      • Re: moore blabla (Re: Fire, Food and Fish - Homo erectus didn't need fire to cook Marc Verhaegen (10/05/04)
      • Re: moore blabla (Re: Fire, Food and Fish - Homo erectus didn't need fire to cook J Moore (10/05/04)
      • Re: Fire, Food and Fish - Homo erectus didn't need fire to cook Rich Travsky (10/13/04)
      • Re: Fire, Food and Fish - Homo erectus didn't need fire to cook Marc Verhaegen (10/13/04)
  • Re: Fire, Food and Fish - Homo erectus didn't need fire to cook Rich Travsky (10/03/04)
  • Re: Fire, Food and Fish - Homo erectus didn't need fire to cook mikelist (10/04/04)
  • Re: Fire, Food and Fish - Homo erectus didn't need fire to cook richard01 (10/04/04)
  • Re: Fire, Food and Fish - Homo erectus didn't need fire to cook richard01 (10/06/04)
    • Re: Fire, Food and Fish - Homo erectus didn't need fire to cook Marc Verhaegen (10/06/04)
    • Re: Fire, Food and Fish - Homo erectus didn't need fire to cook Quitten McKrappen (10/07/04)
    • Re: Fire, Food and Fish - Homo erectus didn't need fire to cook John Wilkins (10/07/04)
      • Re: Fire, Food and Fish - Homo erectus didn't need fire to cook richard01 (10/07/04)
      • Re: Fire, Food and Fish - Homo erectus didn't need fire to cook firstjois (10/07/04)
      • Re: Fire, Food and Fish - Homo erectus didn't need fire to cook J Moore (10/07/04)
      • Re: Fire, Food and Fish - Homo erectus didn't need fire to cook richard01 (10/08/04)
    • Re: Fire, Food and Fish - Homo erectus didn't need fire to cook Rich Travsky (10/13/04)
  • Re: Fire, Food and Fish - Homo erectus didn't need fire to cook mikelist (10/17/04)
    • Re: Fire, Food and Fish - Homo erectus didn't need fire to cook Rick Wagler (10/17/04)
      • Re: Fire, Food and Fish - Homo erectus didn't need fire to cook mikelist (10/17/04)
      • Re: Fire, Food and Fish - Homo erectus didn't need fire to cook Rich Travsky (10/18/04)
      • Re: Fire, Food and Fish - Homo erectus didn't need fire to cook richard01 (10/18/04)
      • Re: Fire, Food and Fish - Homo erectus didn't need fire to cook J Moore (10/18/04)
      • Re: Fire, Food and Fish - Homo erectus didn't need fire to cook firstjois (10/23/04)
      • Re: Fire, Food and Fish - Homo erectus didn't need fire to cook richard01 (10/24/04)
      • Re: Fire, Food and Fish - Homo erectus didn't need fire to cook J Moore (10/24/04)
      • Re: Fire, Food and Fish - Homo erectus didn't need fire to cook Rich Travsky (10/24/04)
• Free images of Asterocyclina - Calpionelle - Discocyclina ePalaeontology (10/02/04)
• Re: oldest American skull found! Kevin Jones (10/02/04)
  • Re: oldest American skull found! Doug Weller (10/02/04)
  • Re: oldest American skull found! pete (10/02/04)
    • Re: oldest American skull found! Kevin Jones (10/02/04)
  • Re: oldest American skull found! Igtheist (10/02/04)
    • Re: oldest American skull found!