Lice Evolution May Reflect sapiens/erectus Contact
From: Rich Travsky (traRvEsky_at_hotmMOVEail.com)
Date: 10/05/04
- Next message: Jabriol: "Re: TOBS: WDDK - comments from Porter Kier and Karl Popper, Norman Cousins on SM"
- Previous message: Joan of Spark: "Re: WDDK & the earth was seeded?"
- Next in thread: firstjois: "Re: Lice Evolution May Reflect sapiens/erectus Contact"
- Reply: firstjois: "Re: Lice Evolution May Reflect sapiens/erectus Contact"
- Reply: Rich Travsky: "Link To Full Paper Re: Lice Evolution May Reflect sapiens/erectus Contact"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 13:11:41 -0600
Lengthy but worth it...
http://www.utah.edu/unews/releases/04/oct/licemen.html
Oct. 4, 2004 – A University of Utah study showing how lice evolved
with the people they infested reveals that a now-extinct species of
early human came into direct contact with our species about 25,000
years ago and spread the parasites to our ancestors.
The study found modern humans have two genetically distinct types
of head lice. One type is found worldwide and evolved on the
ancestors of our species, Homo sapiens. The second type is found
only in the Americas, evolved on another early human species
(possibly Homo erectus) and jumped to Homo sapiens during fights,
sex, sharing of clothes or perhaps cannibalism.
“We’ve discovered the ‘smoking louse’ that reveals direct contact
between two early species of humans,” probably in Asia about 25,000
to 30,000 years ago, says study leader Dale Clayton, a professor of
biology at the University of Utah. “Kids today have head lice that
evolved on two species of cavemen. One species led to us. The other
species went extinct.”
Alan Rogers, a co-author of the study and professor of anthropology
at the University of Utah, says: “The record of our past is written
in our parasites.”
The analysis of lice genes also confirmed two other key developments
in human evolution. First, it verified studies showing how and when
various species branched off the family tree of primates and humans.
Second, it confirmed the “out of Africa” theory that the population
of Homo sapiens mushroomed after a small band of the early humans
left Africa sometime between 150,000 and 50,000 years ago.
The study will be published online Oct. 5 in the Public Library of
Science journal PLoS Biology. ...
...
Transmission of the second type of lice from a now-extinct human
species to Homo sapiens may have happened during mating, so Reed
plans a study of pubic or crab lice – which only spread sexually –
to confirm or disprove that possibility. Clayton and Rogers say it’s
also possible our ancestors got the second kind of head lice by
fighting with or cannibalizing another human species – or by sharing
or stealing their clothing.
Clayton says evidence of contact between two species of humans is
surprising because “Homo erectus has long been thought to have gone
extinct hundreds of thousands of years ago,” although recent studies
suggested Homo sapiens might have had contact with Homo erectus in
Asia 50,000 years ago.
Reed says: “Not only did modern humans live contemporaneously with
close cousins such as Neanderthals, but also with more archaic
hominids such as Homo erectus, a species that we have not shared a
common ancestor with for over a million years. It is amazing to know
that we had physical contact with another species of human. We either
battled with them, or lived with them or even mated with them.
Regardless, we touched them, and that is pretty dramatic to think
about.”
Reed wonders if contact with our species proved fatal.
“When scientists first determined that we (Homo sapiens) were
contemporaneous with Neanderthals (Homo neanderthalensis) in Europe,
it was suspicious that our contact with them immediately preceded their
extinction,” Reed says. “Our study has provided evidence that we had
contact with Homo erectus in Asia just prior to the extinction of that
species as well. Did we cause the extinction of two other species of
humans?”
...
The researchers analyzed the physical appearance and genetic material
(mitochondrial DNA) of modern human head lice, Pediculus humanus, to
construct a family tree for lice showing when various species branched
off from each other. Genes of modern lice also were used to reconstruct
their population histories over time.
The researchers found the family tree of the lice closely mirrors the
previously published family tree of humans and their primate ancestors.
...
Scientists already knew that early ancestors of our species, Homo
sapiens, diverged from other archaic humans about 1.2 million years ago.
(There is semantic debate over whether those archaic humans should be
called Homo erectus, or whether the name should be reserved for their
more recent descendants.) The new study showed two almost
identical-looking but genetically different strains of head lice
diverged 1.18 million years ago. That indicates each of the two kinds
of head lice infested a different species of early human as the human
species diverged.
Genes from both types of head lice are found on people today, suggesting
that after infesting Homo erectus or another archaic human species for 1
million years, the second louse type jumped from that soon-to-be-extinct
species and onto Homo sapiens.
“In order for the archaic human lice to still exist on modern humans,
archaic and modern humans had to coexist in time and space,” Clayton
says.
Some of the findings conflict with two major theories of human evolution
– the “replacement model” and “multiregional model” and instead fit best
with a third theory known as the “diffusion wave model.”
...
The new study confirmed several events in primate and human evolution.
The researchers found chimp lice and human lice diverged roughly 5.6
million years ago, consistent with previous evidence that chimps and
human ancestors diverged from a common ancestor about 5.5 million years
ago.
...
This particular article didn't make it quite clear why it was erectus and
not neanderthal, given the dates involved. A New Scientist article
clarifies a bit:
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99996489
...
Reed and colleagues found that the two louse lineages were very different,
making it extremely unlikely that they evolved to their current state on
the same species. It is probable, he says, that the louse found only in
the Americas evolved on H. erectus while the worldwide louse evolved on
the line that eventually became H. sapiens.
Relatively recently - approximately 100,000 years ago - the New World louse
found its way back onto H. sapiens in Asia who then carried it with them to
the Americas. The researchers say there must have been some contact between
the two hominid species before H. erectus finally died out.
But there are alternative explanations for the findings. Mark Stoneking, an
expert on human evolution from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary
Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, says the findings depend on the last
common ancestor of the two species of lice having lived almost 1.2 million
years ago. The calculation to obtain this figure depends on the size of the
lice population at that time. So if the population estimates are inaccurate,
the results may be misleading, he says.
...
- Next message: Jabriol: "Re: TOBS: WDDK - comments from Porter Kier and Karl Popper, Norman Cousins on SM"
- Previous message: Joan of Spark: "Re: WDDK & the earth was seeded?"
- Next in thread: firstjois: "Re: Lice Evolution May Reflect sapiens/erectus Contact"
- Reply: firstjois: "Re: Lice Evolution May Reflect sapiens/erectus Contact"
- Reply: Rich Travsky: "Link To Full Paper Re: Lice Evolution May Reflect sapiens/erectus Contact"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]