Re: moore blabla (Re: Is SCIENCE magazine 2 or more years behind; Re: Orrorin
From: Mario Petrinovich (mario.petrinovic1_at_zg.htnet.hr)
Date: 10/10/04
- Next message: Rick Wagler: "Re: moore blabla (Re: Is SCIENCE magazine 2 or more years behind; Re: Orrorin"
- Previous message: Marc Verhaegen: "Re: moore blabla (Re: Is SCIENCE magazine 2 or more years behind; Re: Orrorin"
- Maybe in reply to: Marc Verhaegen: "moore blabla (Re: Is SCIENCE magazine 2 or more years behind; Re: Orrorin"
- Next in thread: firstjois: "Re: moore blabla (Re: Is SCIENCE magazine 2 or more years behind; Re: Orrorin"
- Reply: firstjois: "Re: moore blabla (Re: Is SCIENCE magazine 2 or more years behind; Re: Orrorin"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 14:11:29 +0100
pete:
> Rick Wagler:
>> So what does it mean to be "functionally fish"?
>
> To swim very well.
>
>> And how do penguins resemble a "functional
>> fish'?
>
> They swim very well. -- pete
: ). Excellent Pete. You see, I have to deal, here, with people who
even cannot grasp the basic concepts. And then I am funny, or whatever. Are
you interested in my ideas about (straight body) bipedalism? -- Mario
- Next message: Rick Wagler: "Re: moore blabla (Re: Is SCIENCE magazine 2 or more years behind; Re: Orrorin"
- Previous message: Marc Verhaegen: "Re: moore blabla (Re: Is SCIENCE magazine 2 or more years behind; Re: Orrorin"
- Maybe in reply to: Marc Verhaegen: "moore blabla (Re: Is SCIENCE magazine 2 or more years behind; Re: Orrorin"
- Next in thread: firstjois: "Re: moore blabla (Re: Is SCIENCE magazine 2 or more years behind; Re: Orrorin"
- Reply: firstjois: "Re: moore blabla (Re: Is SCIENCE magazine 2 or more years behind; Re: Orrorin"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|