Re: Bipedal Orrorin?
From: firstjois (firstjoisyike_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 10/13/04
- Next message: Philip Deitiker: "Re: Bipedal Orrorin?"
- Previous message: Algis Kuliukas: "Re: Bipedal Orrorin?"
- In reply to: Algis Kuliukas: "Re: Bipedal Orrorin?"
- Next in thread: Rich Travsky: "Re: Bipedal Orrorin?"
- Reply: Rich Travsky: "Re: Bipedal Orrorin?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 11:10:42 -0400
Algis Kuliukas wrote:
>> "Michael Clark" <biteme@spammer.com> wrote in message
>> news:<pNKdne3dvMbmm_DcRVnysw@skypoint.com>...
>>> "Algis Kuliukas" <algis@RiverApes.com> wrote in message
>>> news:77a70442.0410130200.12b41eee@posting.google.com...
>>>> Rich Travsky <traRvEsky@hotMOVEmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:<416C99F5.18999F25@hotMOVEmail.com>...
>>>
>>> [list of publications]
>>>
>>>> -Langdon's Critique finally critiqued.
>>>> http://www.riverapes.com/AAH/Arguments/Langdon/LangdonCritique.pdf
>>>>
>>>> I think that's a little more than 'something'.
>>>
>>> You would think there would be a way to shame you into
>>> the use of a small bit of critical thought. I guess not. Algis,
>>> your list is laughable. *You* are laughable. Get a grip.
>>
>> The point that you snipped was the claim that nothing had emerged to
>> enhance the AAH position in nine years.
>>
>> I listed 54 pieces of evidence, most from the literature, that
>> contradict that view.
>>
>> Algis Kuliukas
Do you want Rich, Michael, and Jim, to waste their time on this or would it
be okay with you if I just go ahead and do it?
Jois
- Next message: Philip Deitiker: "Re: Bipedal Orrorin?"
- Previous message: Algis Kuliukas: "Re: Bipedal Orrorin?"
- In reply to: Algis Kuliukas: "Re: Bipedal Orrorin?"
- Next in thread: Rich Travsky: "Re: Bipedal Orrorin?"
- Reply: Rich Travsky: "Re: Bipedal Orrorin?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|