Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton
From: deowll (deowll_at_bellsouth.net)
Date: 10/30/04
- Next message: arne97: "Re: straight body (Re: moore blabla (Re: Is SCIENCE magazine 2 or more years behind; Re: Orrorin"
- Previous message: Enkidu: "Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton"
- In reply to: Enkidu: "Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton"
- Next in thread: MrPepper11: "Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 10:21:18 -0500
"Enkidu" <enkidu@leaddogs.org> wrote in message
news:Xns959250B7DF36Fenkiduleaddogsorg@68.6.19.6...
> "deowll" <deowll@bellsouth.net> wrote in
> news:UGEgd.215$cS6.150@bignews6.bellsouth.net:
>
> [snip]
>
>> National Geographic is planning a special. I forgot the date but it
>> was at their web site.
>
> "New Scientist" has an article on it this week. I haven't read it yet, it
> just arrived in the post last night.
>
> --
> Enkidu
>
> "Yee-Ha" is not a foreign policy.
You might share any insights it contains. I'm finding a lot of contradictory
claims. This being is anywhere from 90 cm or one yard to a meter tall. They
ought to be able to beat that but then they may be talking about different
members of the population and making some sort of generalizations. It is not
clear.
The weight claims have ranged from 35 pounds to about 50 pounds.
The offical text in the offical mag says no arms yet but I've seen film
showing what was supposed to be the body with an arm. I suppose it might not
go with this body or something.
- Next message: arne97: "Re: straight body (Re: moore blabla (Re: Is SCIENCE magazine 2 or more years behind; Re: Orrorin"
- Previous message: Enkidu: "Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton"
- In reply to: Enkidu: "Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton"
- Next in thread: MrPepper11: "Re: Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|