sci.anthropology.paleo
By Thread
1527 messages sorted by: [ date ]
Starting: 10/31/04
Ending: 11/30/04
- A little more on Neanderthal / HSS interbreeding. . . . .. . Bob Keeter (11/30/04)
- sex steroids in human evolution James Michael Howard (11/29/04)
- !Re: Updated AAH Definition Michael Clark (11/28/04)
- Re: Talk.origin banned subject : Evolution - frequently asked questions--realisticreplies Jabriol (11/28/04)
- Pronounciation John Smith (11/27/04)
- Mitochondrial Mutations May Have Aided Brain Evolution Rich Travsky (11/27/04)
- "all hominins appear to be a single gradually evolving lineage" James Michael Howard (11/26/04)
- traditional theory of human evolution Marc Verhaegen (11/26/04)
- Re: traditional theory of human evolution Su Solomon (11/26/04)
- Re: traditional theory of human evolution John Wilkins (11/27/04)
- Re: traditional theory of human evolution firstjois (11/27/04)
- Re: traditional theory of human evolution Michael Clark (11/27/04)
- Re: traditional theory of human evolution Philip Deitiker (11/27/04)
- Re: traditional theory of human evolution Su Solomon (11/27/04)
- Re: traditional theory of human evolution Su Solomon (11/27/04)
- Re: traditional theory of human evolution Philip Deitiker (11/27/04)
- Re: traditional theory of human evolution John Wilkins (11/27/04)
- Re: traditional theory of human evolution Philip Deitiker (11/27/04)
- Re: traditional theory of human evolution John Wilkins (11/28/04)
- Re: traditional theory of human evolution firstjois (11/28/04)
- Re: traditional theory of human evolution John Wilkins (11/27/04)
- Re: traditional theory of human evolution Su Solomon (11/26/04)
- Pierolapithecus - long fingers & arms are derived in apes (but not in humans) Marc Verhaegen (11/25/04)
- Article: Intensive fishing was an ancient practice Robert Karl Stonjek (11/25/04)
- Was the African strandlopers homo erectus or sapiens? Knullruffs (11/25/04)
- Foot of Oreopithecus indicates a stationary existence Jim McGinn (11/24/04)
- Long time no see Mario Petrinovich (11/24/04)
- Re: throwing and running not rival hypotheses Archimedes Plutonium (11/24/04)
- Topper 101: class in session Lee Olsen (11/23/04)
- Re: Discovery puts humans in South Carolina 50,000 years ago Daryl Krupa (11/23/04)
- AFAICT We are now down to one conversation on SAP - Mosaic Theory firstjois (11/22/04)
- Re: AFAICT We are now down to one conversation on SAP - Mosaic Theory Nick Maclaren (11/22/04)
- Re: AFAICT We are now down to one conversation on SAP - Mosaic Theory firstjois (11/22/04)
- Re: AFAICT We are now down to one conversation on SAP - Mosaic Theory Jim McGinn (11/23/04)
- Re: AFAICT We are now down to one conversation on SAP - Mosaic Theory Nick Maclaren (11/23/04)
- Re: AFAICT We are now down to one conversation on SAP - Mosaic Theory firstjois (11/23/04)
- Re: AFAICT We are now down to one conversation on SAP - Mosaic Theory Jim McGinn (11/23/04)
- Re: AFAICT We are now down to one conversation on SAP - Mosaic Theory Jim McGinn (11/23/04)
- Re: AFAICT We are now down to one conversation on SAP - Mosaic Theory Nick Maclaren (11/23/04)
- Re: AFAICT We are now down to one conversation on SAP - Mosaic Theory Jim McGinn (11/24/04)
- Re: AFAICT We are now down to one conversation on SAP - Mosaic Theory firstjois (11/22/04)
- Re: AFAICT We are now down to one conversation on SAP - Mosaic Theory Nick Maclaren (11/22/04)
- Communal Ape Jim McGinn (11/22/04)
- swamp forests, tool use, social life & CC Marc Verhaegen (11/21/04)
- Re: Why, I'll Be an Uncle's Monkey SlickNick04 (11/21/04)
- OT but Still Food for Thought: firstjois (11/21/04)
- Scientists Find Prehistoric Dwarf Skeleton Cindi Jenkins (11/20/04)
- References for date of La Chapelle-aux-Saints 1? Ernie Wright (11/20/04)
- Re: Homo floresiensis: average vs individual measurements? deowll (11/20/04)
- Born to swim - Bramble & Lieberman 2004 "Endurance running and the evolution of Homo" Nature 432:345-352 Marc Verhaegen (11/19/04)
- U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Rich Travsky (11/19/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates IE.Johansson (11/20/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates deowll (11/20/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates IE.Johansson (11/20/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Bob Keeter (11/20/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Doug Weller (11/20/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Daryl Krupa (11/27/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates IE Johansson (11/27/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Doug Weller (11/27/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Erik Hammerstad (11/27/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Daryl Krupa (11/29/04)
- Topper Site physical characteristics: WAS: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Daryl Krupa (11/29/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Doug Weller (11/20/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Ross Macfarlane (11/22/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Doug Weller (11/22/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Bob Keeter (11/23/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Lee Olsen (11/23/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Bob Keeter (11/24/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Seppo Renfors (11/24/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Lee Olsen (11/24/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Seppo Renfors (11/25/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Tom McDonald (11/25/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Seppo Renfors (11/26/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates I E Johansson (11/26/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Seppo Renfors (11/26/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates IE Johansson (11/26/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Hyperoglyphe (11/26/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Seppo Renfors (11/27/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates IE Johansson (11/27/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Doug Weller (11/27/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Philip Deitiker (11/27/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Seppo Renfors (11/28/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Seppo Renfors (11/27/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates IE Johansson (11/27/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Seppo Renfors (11/28/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates IE Johansson (11/28/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Seppo Renfors (11/28/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates IE Johansson (11/29/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Seppo Renfors (11/29/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates IE Johansson (11/29/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Doug Weller (11/26/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Erik Hammerstad (11/26/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Doug Weller (11/27/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Doug Weller (11/27/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Seppo Renfors (11/27/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Tom McDonald (11/26/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Seppo Renfors (11/27/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Tom McDonald (11/27/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Seppo Renfors (11/28/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Lee Olsen (11/24/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Daryl Krupa (11/27/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Daryl Krupa (11/27/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Philip Deitiker (11/27/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Eric Stevens (11/27/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Daryl Krupa (11/29/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates Quitten McKrappen (11/24/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates deowll (11/20/04)
- Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates IE.Johansson (11/20/04)
- laryngeal & hyoidal descent Marc Verhaegen (11/19/04)
- Why Humans are Relatively Hairless: Testosterone James Michael Howard (11/19/04)
- Pierolapithecus --> Oreopithecus --> Orrorin --> humanity; Cradle of humanity was not Africa but Europe; Stonethrowing theory Archimedes Plutonium (11/19/04)
- Re: Pierolapithecus --> Oreopithecus --> Orrorin --> humanity; Cradle of humanity was not Africa but Europe; Stonethrowing theory Archimedes Plutonium (11/20/04)
- Re: Pierolapithecus --> Oreopithecus --> Orrorin --> humanity; Cradle of humanity was not Africa but Europe; Stonethrowing theory mikelist (11/20/04)
- Prediction of Stonethrowing theory Re: Pierolapithecus --> Oreopithecus --> Orrorin --> humanity; Cradleof humanity was not Africa but Europe; Stonethrowing theory Archimedes Plutonium (11/21/04)
- Underarmpithecus --> Overarmpithecus --> Oreopithecus Re: Prediction of Stonethrowing theory Re: Pierolapithecus --> Oreopithecus --> Orrorin --> humanity; Cradleof humanity was not Africa but Europe; Stonethrowing theory Archimedes Plutonium (11/21/04)
- Re: Underarmpithecus --> Overarmpithecus --> Oreopithecus Archimedes Plutonium (11/22/04)
- Prediction of Stonethrowing theory Re: Pierolapithecus --> Oreopithecus --> Orrorin --> humanity; Cradleof humanity was not Africa but Europe; Stonethrowing theory Archimedes Plutonium (11/21/04)
- Scientifical Google Mario Petrinovich (11/19/04)
- Real-time Review arne97 (11/19/04)
- Coastal apes and falling sea-levels. Paul Crowley (11/19/04)
- Born to exaggerate Jim McGinn (11/19/04)
- Pierolapithecus catalaunicus Article Up On Science Now Rich Travsky (11/19/04)
- A few Topper references Lee Olsen (11/19/04)
- New Fossil Ape Find In Spain - 13 mya Pierolapithecus catalaunicus Rich Travsky (11/18/04)
- born to run Marc Verhaegen (11/18/04)
- New Google Service Searches Only Science/Technical Fields Rich Travsky (11/18/04)
- Re: New Google Service Searches Only Science/Technical Fields Jacques Guy (11/19/04)
- Re: New Google Service Searches Only Science/Technical Fields Richard Herring (11/19/04)
- Re: New Google Service Searches Only Science/Technical Fields alexV (11/19/04)
- Re: New Google Service Searches Only Science/Technical Fields Jacques Guy (11/19/04)
- Re: New Google Service Searches Only Science/Technical Fields Rolleston (11/19/04)
- Re: New Google Service Searches Only Science/Technical Fields Pieter Z. (11/19/04)
- Re: New Google Service Searches Only Science/Technical Fields Jacques Guy (11/20/04)
- More on (moron?) New Google Service Searches Only Science/Technical Fields Jacques Guy (11/20/04)
- Re: More on (moron?) New Google Service Searches Only Science/Technical Fields Bill Bonde ( ``And the Lamb lies down on Broadway'' ) (11/20/04)
- Re: New Google Service Searches Only Science/Technical Fields Pieter Z. (11/20/04)
- Re: New Google Service Searches Only Science/Technical Fields Peter T. Daniels (11/20/04)
- Re: New Google Service Searches Only Science/Technical Fields Eric Stevens (11/20/04)
- Re: New Google Service Searches Only Science/Technical Fields Peter T. Daniels (11/20/04)
- Re: New Google Service Searches Only Science/Technical Fields Eric Stevens (11/21/04)
- Re: New Google Service Searches Only Science/Technical Fields Peter T. Daniels (11/21/04)
- Re: New Google Service Searches Only Science/Technical Fields Brian M. Scott (11/21/04)
- Re: New Google Service Searches Only Science/Technical Fields Eric Stevens (11/21/04)
- Re: New Google Service Searches Only Science/Technical Fields Peter T. Daniels (11/21/04)
- Re: New Google Service Searches Only Science/Technical Fields Eric Stevens (11/22/04)
- Re: New Google Service Searches Only Science/Technical Fields alexV (11/21/04)
- Re: New Google Service Searches Only Science/Technical Fields Jacques Guy (11/19/04)
- born to run or born to have a big brain? James Michael Howard (11/18/04)
- Stonethrowing theory has a competitor/rival theory of Running by Lieberman & Bramble Archimedes Plutonium (11/18/04)
- Re: Stonethrowing theory has a competitor/rival theory of Running by Lieberman & Bramble Archimedes Plutonium (11/20/04)
- Re: Stonethrowing theory has a competitor/rival theory of Running by Lieberman & Bramble Archimedes Plutonium (11/20/04)
- Re: Stonethrowing theory has a competitor/rival theory of Running by Lieberman & Bramble Archimedes Plutonium (11/21/04)
- errors of Lieberman & Bramble Re: Stonethrowing theory Archimedes Plutonium (11/21/04)
- Re: errors of Lieberman & Bramble Re: Stonethrowing theory Jim McGinn (11/22/04)
- Re: errors of Lieberman & Bramble Re: Stonethrowing theory Mark Feldman (11/26/04)
- Re: errors of Lieberman & Bramble Re: Stonethrowing theory Archimedes Plutonium (11/26/04)
- Re: errors of Lieberman & Bramble Re: Stonethrowing theory Jim McGinn (11/26/04)
- Re: errors of Lieberman & Bramble Re: Stonethrowing theory Jim McGinn (11/26/04)
- Re: errors of Lieberman & Bramble Re: Stonethrowing theory Mark Feldman (11/27/04)
- Re: errors of Lieberman & Bramble Re: Stonethrowing theory Jim McGinn (11/27/04)
- Re: errors of Lieberman & Bramble Re: Stonethrowing theory Mark Feldman (11/28/04)
- Re: errors of Lieberman & Bramble Re: Stonethrowing theory Philip Deitiker (11/28/04)
- Re: errors of Lieberman & Bramble Re: Stonethrowing theory Jim McGinn (11/28/04)
- Re: errors of Lieberman & Bramble Re: Stonethrowing theory Philip Deitiker (11/28/04)
- Re: errors of Lieberman & Bramble Re: Stonethrowing theory firstjois (11/29/04)
- female throwing different male throwing because of genetics; helps prove Stonethrowing theory Re: errors of Lieberman & Bramble Re: Stonethrowing theory Archimedes Plutonium (11/29/04)
- Re: errors of Lieberman & Bramble Re: Stonethrowing theory Jim McGinn (11/22/04)
- Born to run firstjois (11/17/04)
- Re: Born to run Marc Verhaegen (11/17/04)
- Re: Born to run Nick Maclaren (11/17/04)
- Re: Born to run Marc Verhaegen (11/17/04)
- Re: Born to run Nick Maclaren (11/18/04)
- Re: Born to run firstjois (11/18/04)
- Re: Born to run Marc Verhaegen (11/18/04)
- Re: Born to run firstjois (11/18/04)
- Arguments of savanna idiots (Re: Born to run Marc Verhaegen (11/18/04)
- Re: Arguments of savanna idiots (Re: Born to run Spiznet (11/19/04)
- Re: Born to run Nick Maclaren (11/18/04)
- Re: Born to run Marc Verhaegen (11/18/04)
- Re: Born to run Nick Maclaren (11/18/04)
- Re: Born to run Marc Verhaegen (11/18/04)
- Re: Born to run deowll (11/20/04)
- Re: Born to run firstjois (11/18/04)
- Re: Born to run Nick Maclaren (11/18/04)
- Re: Born to run firstjois (11/18/04)
- Re: Born to run Nick Maclaren (11/18/04)
- Re: Born to run firstjois (11/19/04)
- Re: Born to run firstjois (11/18/04)
- Re: Born to run firstjois (11/18/04)
- Re: Born to run Paul Crowley (11/18/04)
- Re: Born to run Marc Verhaegen (11/17/04)
- Re: Born to run Nick Maclaren (11/17/04)
- Re: Born to run firstjois (11/18/04)
- Re: Born to run John Roth (11/18/04)
- Re: Born to run firstjois (11/18/04)
- Re: Born to run Nick Maclaren (11/18/04)
- Re: Born to run Nick Maclaren (11/18/04)
- Re: Born to run John Roth (11/18/04)
- Re: Born to run Nick Maclaren (11/18/04)
- Re: Born to run Rich Travsky (11/24/04)
- Travsky runs down small antelopes in less than 26 miles (Re: Born to run Marc Verhaegen (11/26/04)
- Re: MArc runs and trips Rich Travsky (11/29/04)
- Re: Born to run Al Zeller (11/18/04)
- Re: Born to run - responses John Roth (11/18/04)
- Re: Born to run Marc Verhaegen (11/17/04)
- Fifty-thousand friggin' years? Darren Garrison (11/17/04)
- Initial reaction to Cinq-Mars 11/17/2004 Lee Olsen (11/17/04)
- Re: Bang!!!! he is dead now!-- human evolution in action Jabriol (11/17/04)
- Re: Bang!!!! he is dead now!-- human evolution in action Lawrence Seib (11/17/04)
- Re: Bang!!!! he is dead now!-- human evolution in action Budikka (11/20/04)
- Re: HOW NOW BROWN watery COW? firstjois (11/16/04)
- An Open Letter to PRESIDENT BUSH Ed Conrad (11/16/04)
- Evolutionists Get the Bird on Thanksgiving Ed Conrad (11/16/04)
- MAN AS OLD AS COAL at World Mystery Park. Ed Conrad (11/16/04)
- A gay neanderthal comes in your bed ! ! ! ! Hans-Marc Olsen (11/16/04)
- TOBS: Bang!!!! he is dead now!-- human evolution in action JaBrIoLeGit (11/16/04)
- Re: Bang!!!! he is dead now!-- human evolution in action = JABRIOL IS A TROLL! Rusty Nale (11/16/04)
- Re: TOBS: Bang!!!! he is dead now!-- human evolution in action Mekkala (11/16/04)
- Re: TOBS: Bang!!!! he is dead now!-- human evolution in action Tukla Ratte (11/17/04)
- Re: TOBS: Bang!!!! he is dead now!-- human evolution in action Budikka (11/21/04)
- LECTURE ON EARLY EGYPTIAN KINGSHIP IN TORONTO Society for the Study of Egyptian Antiquities (11/15/04)
- How the Hypothesis of an Aquatic Human Ancestor was formulated Lorenzo L. Love (11/15/04)
- Could dinosaurs have set their nests? dh_ld_at_nomail.com (11/14/04)
- Re: Could dinosaurs have set their nests? John Harshman (11/15/04)
- Re: Could dinosaurs have set their nests? Ken Shaw (11/15/04)
- Re: Could dinosaurs have set their nests? mikelist (11/15/04)
- Re: Could dinosaurs have set their nests? deowll (11/20/04)
- Re: Could dinosaurs have set their nests? Ken Shaw (11/20/04)
- Re: Could dinosaurs have set their nests? deowll (11/20/04)
- Re: Could dinosaurs have set their nests? Ken Shaw (11/20/04)
- Re: Could dinosaurs have set their nests? Philip Deitiker (11/20/04)
- Re: Could dinosaurs have set their nests? pete (11/21/04)
- HOW NOW BROWN COW? Ed Conrad (11/14/04)
- Making Swiss Cheese of the Evolutionists Ed Conrad (11/14/04)
- PUTTING CRIME IN RHYME Ed Conrad (11/14/04)
- Evolutionists Getting Away with MURDER Ed Conrad (11/14/04)
- BRAINS IN COLLISION. Ed Conrad (11/14/04)
- The Evolutionists' Prayer. Ed Conrad (11/14/04)
- human gait and posture Marc Verhaegen (11/14/04)
- American Journal of Physical Anthropology vol. 125, no. 3, November, 2004: Table of Contents Phillip Bigelow (11/14/04)
- Re: Big Bertha Thing blogs Tony Lance (11/13/04)
- Chock on THIS, Pseudos! Ed Conrad (11/13/04)
- An OPEN LETTER to Larry King. Ed Conrad (11/13/04)
- FOUR little WORDS but a mouthful Ed Conrad (11/13/04)
- Scaling stone tools... mikelist (11/12/04)
- The (new?) Moravian Venus Ross Macfarlane (11/12/04)
- Lokalalei vs Flores (Re: Importance of Flores Overstated?) Lee Olsen (11/12/04)
- Re: Lokalalei vs Flores (Re: Importance of Flores Overstated?) Daryl Habel (11/12/04)
- Re: Lokalalei vs Flores (Re: Importance of Flores Overstated?) Lee Olsen (11/14/04)
- Re: Lokalalei vs Flores (Re: Importance of Flores Overstated?) Daryl Habel (11/14/04)
- Re: Lokalalei vs Flores (Re: Importance of Flores Overstated?) Daryl Habel (11/14/04)
- Re: Lokalalei vs Flores (Re: Importance of Flores Overstated?) Philip Deitiker (11/14/04)
- Kara-Bom and Lia Buang (was Re: Lokalalei vs Flores (Re: Importance of Flores Overstated?) Daryl Habel (11/15/04)
- Re: Lokalalei vs Flores (Re: Importance of Flores Overstated?) Lee Olsen (11/15/04)
- Re: Lokalalei vs Flores (Re: Importance of Flores Overstated?) Daryl Habel (11/16/04)
- Re: Lokalalei vs Flores (Re: Importance of Flores Overstated?) Lee Olsen (11/17/04)
- Re: Lokalalei vs Flores (Re: Importance of Flores Overstated?) Daryl Habel (11/17/04)
- Re: Lokalalei vs Flores (Re: Importance of Flores Overstated?) Lee Olsen (11/18/04)
- Re: Lokalalei vs Flores (Re: Importance of Flores Overstated?) Daryl Habel (11/17/04)
- Re: Lokalalei vs Flores (Re: Importance of Flores Overstated?) Lee Olsen (11/17/04)
- Re: Lokalalei vs Flores (Re: Importance of Flores Overstated?) Lee Olsen (11/14/04)
- Re: Lokalalei vs Flores (Re: Importance of Flores Overstated?) Daryl Habel (11/12/04)
- Re: Lokalalei vs Flores (Re: Importance of Flores Overstated?) Daryl Habel (11/12/04)
- DHEA and abdominal fat in JAMA James Michael Howard (11/11/04)
- Re: Evolution in doubt by science yet again - an attempt to mislead? Ghod (11/11/04)
- Prehistoric Discoveries Lorenzo L. Love (11/11/04)
- Indonesian PA Denies floresiensis Is A New Species Rich Travsky (11/10/04)
- EVOLUTION ON ITS LAST LEG EdConrad (11/10/04)
- Re: NOVA show *Neanderthals on Trial*; Stonethrowing theory applied Ralph E Kelley (11/10/04)
- Language? John Roth (11/09/04)
- Re: Language? richard01 (11/10/04)
- Re: Language? Charles (11/10/04)
- Re: Language? Nick Maclaren (11/10/04)
- Re: Language? Jim McGinn (11/10/04)
- Re: Language? Pauline M Ross (11/11/04)
- Re: Language? John Roth (11/11/04)
- Re: Language? Pauline M Ross (11/11/04)
- Re: Language? John Roth (11/12/04)
- Re: Language? Nick Maclaren (11/12/04)
- Re: Language? John Roth (11/12/04)
- Re: Language? Nick Maclaren (11/12/04)
- Re: Language? John Roth (11/13/04)
- Re: Language? Nick Maclaren (11/13/04)
- Re: Language? John Roth (11/14/04)
- Re: Language? Charles (11/17/04)
- Re: Language? Pauline M Ross (11/12/04)
- Re: Language? John Roth (11/13/04)
- Re: Language? Pauline M Ross (11/14/04)
- Re: Language? John Roth (11/14/04)
- Re: Language? John Roth (11/11/04)
- Re: LIVE FLORESIENSIS PHOTOGRAPHED!!! John B. (11/08/04)
- preadaptations to speech Marc Verhaegen (11/08/04)
- Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? firstjois (11/08/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Nick Maclaren (11/08/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Jason Eshleman (11/08/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Jim McGinn (11/09/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? deowll (11/13/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Nick Maclaren (11/13/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Jason Eshleman (11/14/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Nick Maclaren (11/14/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Jim McGinn (11/14/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Nick Maclaren (11/15/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? mikelist (11/15/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Jim McGinn (11/15/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Nick Maclaren (11/16/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? firstjois (11/16/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Jason Eshleman (11/16/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Marc Verhaegen (11/16/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Jim McGinn (11/16/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? firstjois (11/16/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Nick Maclaren (11/16/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Marc Verhaegen (11/18/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Paul Crowley (11/18/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Marc Verhaegen (11/18/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? deowll (11/20/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Nick Maclaren (11/20/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Jason Eshleman (11/21/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Nick Maclaren (11/21/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Jason Eshleman (11/21/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Nick Maclaren (11/21/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? deowll (11/22/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Nick Maclaren (11/22/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Jim McGinn (11/23/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Nick Maclaren (11/23/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? pete (11/23/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? firstjois (11/23/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Jim McGinn (11/23/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? deowll (11/23/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? deowll (11/23/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? deowll (11/23/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Jim McGinn (11/22/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? deowll (11/24/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Jim McGinn (11/22/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? deowll (11/24/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Ross Macfarlane (11/22/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Nick Maclaren (11/22/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Ross Macfarlane (11/22/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Jim McGinn (11/23/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? deowll (11/24/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Jim McGinn (11/24/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? deowll (11/25/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Jim McGinn (11/25/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? deowll (11/27/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Jim McGinn (11/27/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? deowll (11/29/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Jim McGinn (11/29/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? deowll (11/30/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? deowll (11/24/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Paul Crowley (11/22/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Jim McGinn (11/23/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? deowll (11/24/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Paul Crowley (11/24/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Jim McGinn (11/24/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Paul Crowley (11/24/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? deowll (11/25/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Jim McGinn (11/25/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Paul Crowley (11/25/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Jim McGinn (11/26/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? deowll (11/25/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Paul Crowley (11/25/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? deowll (11/27/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Paul Crowley (11/27/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Jim McGinn (11/27/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Paul Crowley (11/27/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Jim McGinn (11/29/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Paul Crowley (11/29/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Jim McGinn (11/29/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? deowll (11/29/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Paul Crowley (11/29/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Paul Crowley (11/22/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Jim McGinn (11/22/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Paul Crowley (11/23/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Jim McGinn (11/24/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? deowll (11/24/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? deowll (11/24/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Paul Crowley (11/24/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Paul Crowley (11/21/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? deowll (11/22/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Paul Crowley (11/20/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Jim McGinn (11/14/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Paul Crowley (11/15/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Bob Keeter (11/14/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Nick Maclaren (11/14/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Jim McGinn (11/15/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Jim McGinn (11/14/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? mikelist (11/15/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Nick Maclaren (11/15/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? mikelist (11/15/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? deowll (11/20/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? firstjois (11/21/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? J Moore (11/08/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Paul Crowley (11/09/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Jim McGinn (11/09/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Nick Maclaren (11/09/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? pete (11/09/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Nick Maclaren (11/09/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? pete (11/09/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Jim McGinn (11/09/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? J Moore (11/09/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Nick Maclaren (11/09/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? firstjois (11/12/04)
- Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous? Nick Maclaren (11/08/04)
- Is Flores man a new species? John B. (11/08/04)
- The Flores Island skeleton. . . . . Bob Keeter (11/07/04)
- How about these chimps? Dunk (11/06/04)
- Philippine Island HE Hopping - Help Needed richard01 (11/06/04)
- Redirection Jim McGinn (11/06/04)
- floresiensis & AAT Marc Verhaegen (11/05/04)
- OT Wood Floor Finish Help - Pine firstjois (11/05/04)
- OT: Suffering from Low Blood Pressure? Here's the cure: firstjois (11/04/04)
- flores Sits In A Drawer In Jakarta Rich Travsky (11/03/04)
- About the brain size of H. floriensis Raimo Kangasniemi (11/02/04)
- Importance of Flores Overstated? Prof Marvel (11/02/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? Nick Maclaren (11/02/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? firstjois (11/03/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? Nick Maclaren (11/04/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? firstjois (11/04/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? Daryl Habel (11/04/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? firstjois (11/04/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? Daryl Habel (11/05/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? firstjois (11/05/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? Daryl Habel (11/07/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? richard01 (11/06/04)
- Brandon Jones (Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? Marc Verhaegen (11/06/04)
- Re: Brandon Jones (Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? Daryl Habel (11/07/04)
- Re: Brandon Jones (Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? Marc Verhaegen (11/07/04)
- Re: Brandon Jones (Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? Daryl Habel (11/08/04)
- Re: Brandon Jones (Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? Marc Verhaegen (11/11/04)
- Re: Brandon Jones (Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? Daryl Habel (11/11/04)
- Re: Brandon Jones (Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? Marc Verhaegen (11/11/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? Daryl Habel (11/07/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? Lee Olsen (11/08/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? Daryl Habel (11/09/04)
- URL correction (was Re: Importance of Flores Overstated?) Daryl Habel (11/09/04)
- Re: URL correction (was Re: Importance of Flores Overstated?) Lee Olsen (11/09/04)
- Re: URL correction (was Re: Importance of Flores Overstated?) deowll (11/13/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? pete (11/09/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? Lee Olsen (11/10/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? pete (11/10/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? Daryl Habel (11/11/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? Lee Olsen (11/12/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? pete (11/12/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? Daryl Habel (11/12/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? deowll (11/13/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? Daryl Habel (11/10/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? Lee Olsen (11/11/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? richard01 (11/10/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? deowll (11/07/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? Daryl Habel (11/09/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? deowll (11/13/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? Lee Olsen (11/08/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? Daryl Habel (11/09/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? Lee Olsen (11/10/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? Daryl Habel (11/11/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? Philip Deitiker (11/11/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? deowll (11/13/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? Philip Deitiker (11/13/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? deowll (11/20/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? Lee Olsen (11/12/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? deowll (11/07/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? deowll (11/07/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? Ross Macfarlane (11/04/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? Nick Maclaren (11/04/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? Ross Macfarlane (11/05/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? Nick Maclaren (11/05/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? deowll (11/07/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? deowll (11/07/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? Ross Macfarlane (11/08/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? deowll (11/13/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? deowll (11/07/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? firstjois (11/03/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? DCI (11/02/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? Robert Phillips (11/02/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? Rob Duncan (11/03/04)
- Re: Importance of Flores Overstated? Nick Maclaren (11/02/04)
- Project Steve richard01 (11/02/04)
- Jim Moore: Flores man could not have survived predators richard01 (11/02/04)
- Re: Jim Moore: Flores man could not have survived predators J Moore (11/02/04)
- Re: Jim Moore: Flores man could not have survived predators firstjois (11/03/04)
- Re: Jim Moore: Flores man could not have survived predators richard01 (11/04/04)
- Re: Jim Moore: Flores man could not have survived predators Su Solomon (11/04/04)
- Re: Jim Moore: Flores man could not have survived predators J Moore (11/04/04)
- Richard 01 101 firstjois (11/04/04)
- Re: Richard 01 101 firstjois (11/05/04)
- Re: Richard 01 101 (And for other newcomers) richard01 (11/06/04)
- Re: Good Manners & Common Sense in this Forum richard01 (11/06/04)
- Re: Richard 01 101 Lee Olsen (11/06/04)
- Re: Jim Moore: Flores man could not have survived predators richard01 (11/04/04)
- Re: Jim Moore: Flores man could not have survived predators Lee Olsen (11/05/04)
- Re: antiAAT fanatics = minority? (Re: Bipedal Orrorin? firstjois (11/02/04)
- Sex with Flores Women (Welcome to Fantasy Island...) Prof Marvel (11/01/04)
- Stink Signifies the S in Science Ed Conrad (11/01/04)
- human bipedalism in a nutshell Marc Verhaegen (11/01/04)
- Small Brain Size and Intelligence Prof Marvel (11/01/04)
- Are they still there? Prof Marvel (11/01/04)
- Hox Genes - stir fried with eggs on top? firstjois (11/01/04)
- Upregulation - (Should these guys hire creative writers?) firstjois (11/01/04)
- Re: Little People Prof Marvel (11/01/04)
- Re: Amazing Archaeological Find Ed Conrad (11/01/04)
- Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Rich Travsky (10/31/04)
- snorkel noses (Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Marc Verhaegen (10/31/04)
- Re: snorkel noses (Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Rich Travsky (11/01/04)
- Re: snorkel noses (Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Marc Verhaegen (11/01/04)
- Re: snorkel noses (Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Rich Travsky (11/03/04)
- Re: snorkel noses (Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Marc Verhaegen (11/03/04)
- Re: snorkel noses (Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Rich Travsky (11/10/04)
- Re: snorkel noses (Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Marc Verhaegen (11/10/04)
- Re: snorkel noses (Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Rich Travsky (11/17/04)
- Only idiots believe that humans evolved external noses to run after springbok in the heat of the day (Re: snorkel noses (Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Marc Verhaegen (11/17/04)
- Re: Only idiots believe that humans have snorkel noses to run after springbok in the heat of the day (Re: snorkel noses (Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Rich Travsky (11/24/04)
- Re: Only idiots believe that humans have external noses to run after springbok in the heat of the day (Re: snorkel noses (Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Marc Verhaegen (11/24/04)
- Re: Only idiots believe that humans have external noses to run after springbok in the heat of the day (Re: snorkel noses (Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Rick Wagler (11/24/04)
- Re: Only idiots believe that humans have external noses to run after springbok in the heat of the day (Re: snorkel noses (Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Jason Eshleman (11/25/04)
- Re: Only idiots believe that humans have external noses to run after springbok in the heat of the day (Re: snorkel noses (Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Rick Wagler (11/25/04)
- Re: Only idiots believe that humans have external noses to run after springbok in the heat of the day (Re: snorkel noses (Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Jason Eshleman (11/25/04)
- Re: Only idiots believe that humans have external noses to run after springbok in the heat of the day (Re: snorkel noses (Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism deowll (11/27/04)
- Re: Only idiots believe that humans have external noses to run after springbok in the heat of the day (Re: snorkel noses (Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Rich Travsky (11/29/04)
- Re: Only idiots believe that humans have external noses to run after springbok in the heat of the day (Re: snorkel noses (Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Marc Verhaegen (11/29/04)
- Re: Only idiots believe that humans had snorkel noses Rich Travsky (11/29/04)
- Re: Only idiots believe that humans have snorkel noses to run after springbok in the heat of the day (Re: snorkel noses (Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Jason Eshleman (11/24/04)
- Re: Only idiots believe that humans have external noses to run after springbok in the heat of the day (Re: snorkel noses (Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Marc Verhaegen (11/24/04)
- Re: snorkel noses (Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Rich Travsky (11/01/04)
- Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Algis Kuliukas (11/01/04)
- Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Jason Eshleman (11/01/04)
- Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Algis Kuliukas (11/02/04)
- Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism J Moore (11/02/04)
- Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Jason Eshleman (11/02/04)
- Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Algis Kuliukas (11/03/04)
- Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Michael Clark (11/03/04)
- Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism firstjois (11/03/04)
- Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Marc Verhaegen (11/04/04)
- Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Jason Eshleman (11/03/04)
- Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism J Moore (11/03/04)
- Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism John Wilkins (11/04/04)
- Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Algis Kuliukas (11/04/04)
- Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Su Solomon (11/04/04)
- Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Michael Clark (11/04/04)
- Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Su Solomon (11/04/04)
- Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism John Wilkins (11/04/04)
- Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Algis Kuliukas (11/05/04)
- Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism firstjois (11/04/04)
- OT: political generalizations (was Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism) Jason Eshleman (11/04/04)
- Re: political generalizations (was Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism) firstjois (11/04/04)
- Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Algis Kuliukas (11/02/04)
- Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism firstjois (11/03/04)
- Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Paul Crowley (11/16/04)
- Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Nick Maclaren (11/16/04)
- Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism firstjois (11/17/04)
- Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Charles (11/17/04)
- Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Nick Maclaren (11/17/04)
- Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism firstjois (11/18/04)
- Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Nick Maclaren (11/18/04)
- Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism firstjois (11/19/04)
- Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Michael Clark (11/19/04)
- Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism firstjois (11/19/04)
- Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Michael Clark (11/19/04)
- Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Algis Kuliukas (11/17/04)
- Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism firstjois (11/18/04)
- Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Algis Kuliukas (11/18/04)
- Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Paul Crowley (11/17/04)
- Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Nick Maclaren (11/16/04)
- snorkel noses (Re: Ape theories & Aquaticism Marc Verhaegen (10/31/04)
- Annual HALLOWEEN Seance - Velikovsky Ed Conrad (10/31/04)
- Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism Rich Travsky (10/31/04)
- Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism Rich Travsky (10/31/04)
- Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism Marc Verhaegen (11/01/04)
- Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism deowll (11/02/04)
- Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism Rich Travsky (11/03/04)
- Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism Marc Verhaegen (11/03/04)
- Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism Rich Travsky (11/10/04)
- Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism Marc Verhaegen (11/10/04)
- Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism Rich Travsky (11/17/04)
- Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism Marc Verhaegen (11/17/04)
- Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism Su Solomon (11/17/04)
- Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism Marc Verhaegen (11/17/04)
- Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism Rich Travsky (11/24/04)
- Only idiots believe that humans evolved external noses to run after gazelles (Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism Marc Verhaegen (11/24/04)
- Re: Only idiots believe that humans evolved external noses to run after gazelles (Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism deowll (11/25/04)
- Re: Only idiots believe that humans evolved external noses to run after gazelles (Re: Causes of floresiensis' Dwarfism Rich Travsky (11/29/04)
- Re: Only idiots believe that humans had snorkel noses Rich Travsky (11/29/04)
- Only idiots believe that humans evolved external noses to run after gazelles Marc Verhaegen (11/29/04)
- Re: Evidence, and scientific palatability Rich Travsky (10/31/04)
- Re: MSA tools in reef c 125 ka Rich Travsky (10/31/04)
- Re: erectus did hunt (Re: MSA tools in reef c 125 ka Rich Travsky (10/31/04)
- Re: erectus did hunt (Re: MSA tools in reef c 125 ka Marc Verhaegen (11/01/04)
- Re: erectus did hunt (Re: MSA tools in reef c 125 ka Rich Travsky (11/03/04)
- Re: erectus did hunt (Re: MSA tools in reef c 125 ka Marc Verhaegen (11/03/04)
- Re: erectus did hunt (Re: MSA tools in reef c 125 ka Rich Travsky (11/10/04)
- Re: erectus did hunt (Re: MSA tools in reef c 125 ka Marc Verhaegen (11/10/04)
- Re: erectus did hunt (Re: MSA tools in reef c 125 ka Rich Travsky (11/17/04)
- Re: erectus did hunt (Re: MSA tools in reef c 125 ka Marc Verhaegen (11/17/04)
- Re: erectus did hunt (Re: MSA tools in reef c 125 ka Rich Travsky (11/24/04)
- Re: erectus did hunt (Re: MSA tools in reef c 125 ka Marc Verhaegen (11/24/04)
- Re: erectus did hunt (Re: MSA tools in reef c 125 ka Rich Travsky (11/29/04)
- Re: erectus did hunt (Re: MSA tools in reef c 125 ka Rich Travsky (11/03/04)
- Re: erectus did hunt (Re: MSA tools in reef c 125 ka Marc Verhaegen (11/01/04)
- Re: if MYH16 inactivation is c 5 Ma, all apiths fall outside human evolution :-) (was Re: MYH16 Inactivation Pushed Back To *5.3 mya* Rich Travsky (10/31/04)
- Re: if MYH16 inactivation is c 5 Ma, all apiths fall outside human evolution :-) (was Re: MYH16 Inactivation Pushed Back To *5.3 mya* Marc Verhaegen (11/01/04)
- Re: if MYH16 inactivation is c 5 Ma, all apiths fall outside human evolution :-) (was Re: MYH16 Inactivation Pushed Back To *5.3 mya* Rich Travsky (11/03/04)
- Re: if MYH16 inactivation is c 5 Ma, all apiths fall outside human evolution :-) (was Re: MYH16 Inactivation Pushed Back To *5.3 mya* Marc Verhaegen (11/03/04)
- Re: if MYH16 inactivation is c 5 Ma, all apiths fall outside human evolution :-) (was Re: MYH16 Inactivation Pushed Back To *5.3 mya* Rich Travsky (11/10/04)
- only fools believe that masticatory reduction is for hunting antelopes (Re: if MYH16 inactivation is c 5 Ma, all apiths fall outside human evolution :-) (was Re: MYH16 Inactivation Pushed Back To *5.3 mya* Marc Verhaegen (11/10/04)
- Re: only fools believe that masticatory reduction is for sucking shellfish (Re: if MYH16 inactivation is c 5 Ma, all apiths fall outside human evolution :-) (was Re: MYH16 Inactivation Pushed Back To *5.3 mya* Rich Travsky (11/17/04)
- Re: only fools believe that masticatory reduction is for hunting antelopes (Re: if MYH16 inactivation is c 5 Ma, all apiths fall outside human evolution :-) (was Re: MYH16 Inactivation Pushed Back To *5.3 mya* Marc Verhaegen (11/17/04)
- Re: only fools believe that masticatory reduction is for sucking molluscs (Re: if MYH16 inactivation is c 5 Ma, all apiths fall outside human evolution :-) (was Re: MYH16 Inactivation Pushed Back To *5.3 mya* Rich Travsky (11/24/04)
- Re: only fools believe that masticatory reduction is for hunting atelopes Marc Verhaegen (11/24/04)
- Re: only Marc believes that masticatory reduction is for sucking shellfish Rich Travsky (11/29/04)
- only fools believe that masticatory reduction is for hunting gazelles Marc Verhaegen (11/29/04)
- Re: if MYH16 inactivation is c 5 Ma, all apiths fall outside human evolution :-) (was Re: MYH16 Inactivation Pushed Back To *5.3 mya* Rich Travsky (11/03/04)
- Re: if MYH16 inactivation is c 5 Ma, all apiths fall outside human evolution :-) (was Re: MYH16 Inactivation Pushed Back To *5.3 mya* Marc Verhaegen (11/01/04)
- Re: Human running is something even children can do Re: human running is expensive (Re: Cavalli-Sforza Doesn't Support AAT Rich Travsky (10/31/04)