Re: Updated AAH Definition

From: Marc Verhaegen (fa204466_at_skynet.be)
Date: 11/11/04 

Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 11:25:01 +0100

"Algis Kuliukas" <algis@RiverApes.com> wrote in message
news:77a70442.0411101819.4c7f81a1@posting.google.com...

> How about this, updated, version, Marc?... The Aquatic Ape Hypothesis
(AAH): The hypothesis that water has acted as an agent of selection in the
evolution of humans more than it has in the evolution of our ape cousins and
that, as a result, many of the major physical differences between humans and
the other apes may be explained, at least in part, as adaptations to moving
(wading, swimming and/or diving) better through various aquatic media and
from greater feeding on resources that might be procured from such habitats.

Excellent. Only, I'm not convinced we need definitions of "Aquatic Ape
Hypothesis": it's a misnomer IMO: it's not about apes, but about Homo, it's
not about having been aquatic (some people get weird ideas when hey hear the
word "aquatic"), but waterside, and it's not a hypothesis, but a theory. I
prefer "AAT" - everybody knows what it's about (aqatic ape / aquarboreal
apes / amphibious ancestors / ...):

"AAT proposes that water has acted as an agent of selection in the evolution
of humans (Homo) more than it has in that of chimpanzees (Pan), and that
many of the major physical differences between humans and the other apes may
be explained, in part, as adaptations to moving better through various
aquatic media (wading, swimming and/or diving) and from greater feeding on
aquatic and waterside resources."

We certainly need Homo in the definition: AAT sensu stricto is about Homo,
has nothing to do with apiths.

I'd prefer this: "AAT proposes that human ancestors, during a certain period
after the Homo/Pan split, spent an important part of their day in water,
wading, swimming and diving, and feeding on aquatic and waterside foods."
(why make it longer than necessary?)

This is a minimalistic definition: I'd be more explicit (& more debatable):

"The Aquarboreal Ape Theory proposes that most Miocene hominoids lived in
coastal/swamp forests, and that Homo, after the Homo/Pan split, became
seaside omnivores that once fed predominantly on aquatic and waterside
foods."

If more details are needed, I propose our scenario, of course:

- Aquarboreal Apes Theory of hominoid evolution: "Hominids (chimpanzees,
humans and gorillas) and pongids (orangutans) split in the Miocene. A
climbing-plus-wading lifestyle in coastal or swamp forests, where most
Miocene hominid-pongid fossils are found, helps explain how they (starting
from a more monkey-like body build with narrow thorax and above-branch
locomotion) lost the tail, became much larger, and developed arm-hanging for
below-branch locomotion."

- Amphibious Ancestors Theory of Homo evolution (AAT sensu stricto):
"Plio-Pleistocene human ancestors were sea-side omnivores during a certain
period after the Homo/Pan split. A lifestyle of beach-combing, wading,
swimming, collecting coconuts, shellfish, turtles and turtle eggs, bird
eggs, crabs, seaweeds etc. explains many Homo traits (absent in Pan) much
better than dry savanna scenarios do: very large brain, greater breathing
control and diving skills, smaller mouth and masticatory reduction (myosine
MYH16), well-developed vocality, external nose, extreme handiness and tool
use, reduction of climbing skills, reduction of fur, more subcutaneous fat,
very long legs, more linear body build, reduction of olfactory sense, late
puberty, high needs of iodine, sodium and poly-unsaturated fatty acids, etc.
and in archaic Homo, pachyostosis, auditory exostoses, platycephaly, etc."

> See http://www.riverapes.com/AAH/AAHDefined.htm for further discussion.
Algis Kuliukas

Thanks, Algis, I'll have a look.

--Marc

Relevant Pages

  • Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
    ... Fossils that no doubt belong to Homo are ... - thick enamel: most Miocene apes, apiths, orangs, ... - low ilia: monkeys, apiths & humans ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Culture skews human evolution
    ... Lieberman spoke March 5 in the third of the Harvard Museum of Natural ... History?s?Evolution Matters? ... the evolutionary development of the genus Homo, ... shared by modern humans, Neanderthals, and Homo erectus; ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Culture skews human evolution
    ... Lieberman spoke March 5 in the third of the Harvard Museum of Natural ... History?s?Evolution Matters? ... the evolutionary development of the genus Homo, ... shared by modern humans, Neanderthals, and Homo erectus; ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Upright apes - A.Filler
    ... In the Video: ... humans show off their arm swinging. ... * How apes and humans carry their infants and children as they move. ... Video and Related Data Revolutionizes Human Evolution ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Abdul-Bah=?ISO-8859-1?B?4Q==?= and evolution
    ... Bahá?í writings actually say about evolution one would ... So where did humans come from if they did not come from ... missing link is not a species to connect apes with humans at ... great error for a Darwinian theory of evolution is to assume ...
    (soc.religion.bahai)