Re: Was the African strandlopers homo erectus or sapiens?
From: Happy'Cam'per (s_at_c.c.c)
Date: 11/26/04
- Next message: Nick Maclaren: "Re: oyster middens >1 Ma? (Re: aquatic nonsense (Re: Evolution of human nakedness"
- Previous message: Michael Clark: "Re: Top ten reasons why AAH-Algis fails"
- In reply to: Knullruffs: "Was the African strandlopers homo erectus or sapiens?"
- Next in thread: Marc Verhaegen: "Re: Was the African strandlopers homo erectus or sapiens?"
- Reply: Marc Verhaegen: "Re: Was the African strandlopers homo erectus or sapiens?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 16:07:15 +0200
I would imagine they were the latter (sapiens). FYI roughly translated,
'Strandlopers' is Afrikaans for Beach walkers.......
-- "In the beginning, God said the four-dimensional divergence of an antisymmetric, second rank tensor equals zero, and there was Light , and it was good." "Knullruffs" <Knullruffs@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:d8beac55.0411250858.48309acf@posting.google.com... > Was the African strandlopers homo erectus or sapiens? I've searched > the net and havn't been able to find any conclusive facts.
- Next message: Nick Maclaren: "Re: oyster middens >1 Ma? (Re: aquatic nonsense (Re: Evolution of human nakedness"
- Previous message: Michael Clark: "Re: Top ten reasons why AAH-Algis fails"
- In reply to: Knullruffs: "Was the African strandlopers homo erectus or sapiens?"
- Next in thread: Marc Verhaegen: "Re: Was the African strandlopers homo erectus or sapiens?"
- Reply: Marc Verhaegen: "Re: Was the African strandlopers homo erectus or sapiens?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|