Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates
From: Daryl Krupa (icycalmca_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 11/27/04
- Next message: Rich Travsky: "Mitochondrial Mutations May Have Aided Brain Evolution"
- Previous message: Philip Deitiker: "Re: traditional theory of human evolution"
- In reply to: Bob Keeter: "Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates"
- Next in thread: IE Johansson: "Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates"
- Reply: IE Johansson: "Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 26 Nov 2004 21:15:20 -0800
"Bob Keeter" <rkeeter@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:<eEInd.6693$pK6.1671@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>...
> "IE.Johansson" <ingerx_e.johanssonx@telia.com> wrote in message
> news:ynCnd.9124$d5.79592@newsb.telia.net...
> Snippage. . . .
>
> >> Do an on line search for ice ages. The glaciers never made it into Dixie.
> >
> > deowll,
> > I did such but I don't trust url's on net that much as many do. I would
> > like
> > to be sure. Know persons who seen indication that there have been Ice Coat
> > melting and expending on cliffs in nortern parts of Carolina. It's not so
> > long ago that scholars missed part of the Ice Coat extention in the Old
> > World. Both areas to which the Ice Coat directly or indirectly from the
> > impact of the ice rivers reached and areas which fro some reason or an
> > other
> > wasn't harmed at all.
> >
> > Inger E
> >
>
> If you do manage to find a URL or book that you can trust, I think that you
> will find that the last few rounds of glaciers never really made it past the
> western mountains in Virginia, North Carolina and perhaps the far western
> extremes of South Carolina., and even there the evidence (i.e things that
> look to be "transported bolders", and such) is very scant. Where present, I
> think that the "common knowledge" is that these are likely "mountain
> glaciers" rather than the big continental glaciers of an ice age.
>
> http://www.virginiaplaces.org/geology/glaciers.html
>
> Just a suggestion of a URL to look at. . . . .
>
> Certainly not a scientific study but. . . . . . .When growing up I crawled
> over a lot of hills in western NC and did not find much for glacial-like
> residue..
>
> Regards
> bk
Another two mapps of glacial extent:
Figs. 1 and 2, here, show maximal Laurentide Ice *** extent:
The southern Laurentide Ice ***
http://www.geology.wisc.edu/~davem/abstracts/03-25.pdf
Fig. 3, here, shows mid-Wisconsinan Laurentide Ice *** extent
(which is about where it would have lain 50,000 years ago),
inside the maximal extent in the Late Wisconsinan:
The Laurentide and Innuitian ice sheets during the
Last Glacial Maximum
http://www.geo.oregonstate.edu/people/faculty/clark_publications/Dykeetal-QSR2002.pdf
The second article is a standard reference, by one of the premier
authorities on the subject, in a well-respected peer-reviewed journal
dedicated to the topic.
Daryl Krupa
- Next message: Rich Travsky: "Mitochondrial Mutations May Have Aided Brain Evolution"
- Previous message: Philip Deitiker: "Re: traditional theory of human evolution"
- In reply to: Bob Keeter: "Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates"
- Next in thread: IE Johansson: "Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates"
- Reply: IE Johansson: "Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]