Re: "all hominins appear to be a single gradually evolving lineage"
From: mikelist (mikelist_at_tds.net)
Date: 11/28/04
- Next message: firstjois: "Re: traditional theory of human evolution"
- Previous message: John Wilkins: "Re: traditional theory of human evolution"
- In reply to: Jim McGinn: "Re: "all hominins appear to be a single gradually evolving lineage""
- Next in thread: deowll: "Re: "all hominins appear to be a single gradually evolving lineage""
- Reply: deowll: "Re: "all hominins appear to be a single gradually evolving lineage""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 20:03:02 -0500
Jim McGinn wrote:
a single gradually evolving
>>>>lineage.
Could be that I don't understand that term. Homo sapiens neandertalensis
did not evolve into homo sapiens sapiens, nor did homo erectus
floresensis. There are several lineages of homo erectus some of whom
existed simultaneously. Only one particular group of homo erectus went
on to become homo habilis and only one went on to become homo sapiens
sapiens. That doesn't exclude those people as hominins. A correct
statement as I understand it is " a single lineage of hoinins evolved
into modern man", the question that is unanswered is which population
made the significant jumps?
Mike List
- Next message: firstjois: "Re: traditional theory of human evolution"
- Previous message: John Wilkins: "Re: traditional theory of human evolution"
- In reply to: Jim McGinn: "Re: "all hominins appear to be a single gradually evolving lineage""
- Next in thread: deowll: "Re: "all hominins appear to be a single gradually evolving lineage""
- Reply: deowll: "Re: "all hominins appear to be a single gradually evolving lineage""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|