Re: only Marc believes that masticatory reduction is for sucking shellfish

From: Rich Travsky (_at_hotmMOVEail.com)
Date: 11/29/04 

Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 20:38:11 -0700

Marc Verhaegen wrote:
>
> "Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
> news:41A411D1.5223762F@hotmMOVEail.com...
> > Marc Verhaegen wrote:
> > >
> > > "Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
> > > news:419AD3F8.5B46CFB1@hotmMOVEail.com...
> > > > Marc Verhaegen wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > "Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> still doesn't know
> what a
> > > > > comparative is in message news:41918796.4AF4BC94@hotmMOVEail.com...
> > > > >
> > > > > > > ?? I'm not, man. MYH16 inactivation was obviously more suited
> for
> > > > > consuming (softer) seafood than terr.foods, don't you think?? As
> for
> > > > > suction feeding in human ancestors, I suggest you read our paper
> > > M.Verhaegen
> > > > > & S.Munro 2004 "Possible preadaptations to speech - a preliminary
> > > > > comparative approach" Human Evolution 19:53-70
> > > > >
> > > > > > What proof do you have that "MYH16 inactivation was obviously more
> > > suited
> > > > > for consuming" seafood?
> > > >
> > > > No answer.
> > >
> > > See title.
> >
> > See title.