Re: MArc as always without evidence (Re: bipedalism (Re: Evolution of human nakedness
From: Jim McGinn (jimmcginn_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 11/29/04
- Next message: Daryl Krupa: "Topper Site physical characteristics: WAS: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates"
- Previous message: Jim McGinn: "Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous?"
- In reply to: Rich Travsky: "Re: MArc as always without evidence (Re: bipedalism (Re: Evolution of human nakedness"
- Next in thread: firstjois: "Re: Evolution of human nakedness"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 29 Nov 2004 01:19:44 -0800
Rich Travsky <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote
> > > > IOW, to answer your question: there are so few
> > > > primates that adopted our bipedal locomotion,
> > > > because only humans evolved from coastal
> > > > forest-dwellers into seaside semi-aquatics.
> > > >
> > > > :-)
> > >
> > > Now if you only had some proof of that :-)
>
> Still waiting...
Keep waiting . . .
- Next message: Daryl Krupa: "Topper Site physical characteristics: WAS: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates"
- Previous message: Jim McGinn: "Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous?"
- In reply to: Rich Travsky: "Re: MArc as always without evidence (Re: bipedalism (Re: Evolution of human nakedness"
- Next in thread: firstjois: "Re: Evolution of human nakedness"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]