Re: A new, CORRECT evolutionary theory
awthrawthr_at_yahoo.com
Date: 12/13/04
- Previous message: Rich Travsky: "Re: Only fools believe marc"
- In reply to: pete: "Re: A new, CORRECT evolutionary theory"
- Next in thread: pete: "Re: A new, CORRECT evolutionary theory"
- Reply: pete: "Re: A new, CORRECT evolutionary theory"
- Reply: Mark: "Re: A new, CORRECT evolutionary theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 12 Dec 2004 17:35:01 -0800
A virus made up of a combination of a protein(s), as the primary part,
and a nucleic acid, as the secondary part. It is also alive. It should
be obvious that every living thing must eat something. So an question
could be asked that whatever living thing was first, what was it
eating? This argument, followed to its conclusion would lead to the
theory that nothing preceeded anything else.
Viruses can stay dormant or "reassemble themselves from their protein
constituents if they are given individual nucleic acids to use for that
purpose. Thus apparently dead viruses 'come back to life' in the
presence of the proper materials."
It's possible that viruses and bacteria came about at the same time.
The virus wouldn't need to eat until it picked up a nucleic acid at the
time that bacteria also appeared. In other words, due to their ability
to 'come back to life' an infinite number of times, viruses could have
failed to thrive millions of times until something suitable for the
virus to parasitize on came along: an unhealthy bacteria, for instance.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Visit http://www.itsnotjustforsex.com
- Previous message: Rich Travsky: "Re: Only fools believe marc"
- In reply to: pete: "Re: A new, CORRECT evolutionary theory"
- Next in thread: pete: "Re: A new, CORRECT evolutionary theory"
- Reply: pete: "Re: A new, CORRECT evolutionary theory"
- Reply: Mark: "Re: A new, CORRECT evolutionary theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|