Re: MV is the most published author of SAP

From: Philip Deitiker (Donevenask_at_worlnet.att.net)
Date: 12/18/04 

Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 18:30:22 GMT

"Charles" <lmno@mindspring.com> says in
news:V8Zwd.3464$yK.2217@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net:

> seems to me that just about everybody here in sap, including
> myself, has at one time or another had a hissy fit. we are just
> so damn territorial! --charles

Well at 7000 posts regarding a singular topic, I would say some of us
are much more territorial than others.

I think if we added up all the post from algis, mario, pauline,
marco you would find that their 'territory' covers most of s.a.p.

Unfortunately the science of paleoanthropology as 95% nothing to do
with ape theories at all. Its about recent migrations, molecular
evolution, archaeological hotspots, divisions between species, etc.

So lets just be clear, when some of us present here we are talking,
fairly about that other 95% and probably not enough at that. Whereas
my guess is that the 60% share (discounting the completely OT stuff
from World Class Net Loons) they are 12 fold overrepresenting a
particular aspect, in essence they are trying to dominate the group
and turn it in to their group.

  The same thing goes on in sci.archaeology, except there, there are
a variety of completely squirreled out nuts. Most notably are the
hyperdiffusionist who make claims like the Irish discovered Vanuatu
eons before the columbus did.

  Disliking what someone is talking does not make a person
territorial anymore than the disliked topic is marking off
territorial. Territory is gained and lost in quantities.
The people who would have presented and discussed the other 95% of PA
that's not discussed here have mostly left. THAT is how territorial
they are, so don't hand me some bull*** about us being all
alike. Clearly it is the wanted intent for the AAT group to dominate
this newsgroups, but also realize that in the evolution of all things
good, every species has its day, s.a.p. not to be left out, and
that day gone, the discussion has moved elsewhere and will never
return.
  Algis for instance talking about how well he was taken at a
conference where he spoke and people listened. But one on one with
another science, he pulls every childish propoganda ploy in the book.
That is an attempt to mark off territory, any such person should be
summarily rejected as a scientist. 

-- 
Philip
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
____Groups_____
Mol Anthro   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DNAanthro/
Pal Anthro   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Paleoanthro/
Arch. Aux    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sciarchauxilliary/
Gliadin Sci  http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/GliadinScience/
____Sites_____
Mol. Evol. Hominids http://home.att.net/~DNAPaleoAnth/
Evol. of Xchrom.    http://home.att.net/~DNAPaleoAnth/xlinked.htm
Quantcast