Re: Look humans really are aquatic!
From: firstjois (firstjoisyike_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 12/27/04
- Next message: Philip Deitiker: "Re: selection criteria for obesity"
- Previous message: firstjois: "Re: Look humans really are aquatic!"
- In reply to: Michael Clark: "Re: Look humans really are aquatic!"
- Next in thread: Su Solomon: "Re: Look humans really are aquatic!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 10:13:42 -0500
"Michael Clark" <biteme@spammer.com> wrote in message
news:4OSdnetzEpbFalLcRVnyvQ@skypoint.com...
: "Algis Kuliukas" <algis@RiverApes.com> wrote in message
: news:1104139205.067039.209520@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
: >
: > Philip Deitiker wrote:
: >> http://dailynews.att.net/cgi-
: >> bin/news?e=pri&dt=041226&cat=news&st=newsd877evgg0&src=ap
: >>
: >> Maybe so, they build their houses ocean.
: >> Wee, the sea is so purty. Look at the purty big rolly waves!
: >>
: >> [OK, so I have a morbid sense of humor, :^)]
:
: [...]
:
: > Good fortune will have clearly been
: > the most significant factor but is it really too far fetched to imagine
: > that this kind of event might have, in some small way, acted as an
: > agency of selection for better abilities in water? And if so, doesn't
: > this flip Phillips point around 180 degrees?
:
: So now "good fortune" is the selection criteria. Could a "roll of the
: dice" be too far behind?
:
LOL but it probably would take an 11 commandment on a block of stone.
Jois
- Next message: Philip Deitiker: "Re: selection criteria for obesity"
- Previous message: firstjois: "Re: Look humans really are aquatic!"
- In reply to: Michael Clark: "Re: Look humans really are aquatic!"
- Next in thread: Su Solomon: "Re: Look humans really are aquatic!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]