Re: Only fools believe that human ancestors could not have been coastal once because there exist tsunamis... ( Re: Look humans really are aquatic!

From: Marc Verhaegen (fa204466_at_skynet.be)
Date: 12/27/04 

Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 23:56:20 +0100

"Rick Wagler" <taxidea3@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:1A%zd.600335$%k.311748@pd7tw2no...

> > Misreprenting what I said. Disgusting & ridiculous. Bah! Still too
stupid, Wagler, to tell us why you believe human ancestors could not have
lived at the coasts??

> And when have I or anyone else said human ancestors could not live at the
coasts?

AAT says human ancestors were waterside once, forgot, my boy? You say AAT is
wrong, IOW, you claim human ancestors did not live at the waterside
incl.coasts: if they did, they had waterside adaptations. Read Hardy, my
boy. Inform a little bit before opening your big mouth again. Just tell us
why these waterside Homo would not collect shells, crabs etc.? If they water
waterside, whuy do you claim our ancestors could not have been waterside??

> If you have coastal archaeological

never heard of Flores??

> or palaeontological sites

never heard of Mojokerto??

> then that's where they lived alright.

It's not, you fool! Just try to understand that human evolution is not about
fossils, but about human ancestors! Please waste your won time.

> It's your ignoring the vast quantity of non-coastal sites

You're really really stupid: why ignore I them: how does the existence of
non-coastal sites contradict AAT, IYO?? Just tell me that.

> in order to argue for a 'coastal phase' which is the issue. Rick Wagler

Again.
Try to follow for once.
Please.
1.8 My.
Homo at Ain Hanech.
Okidoki?
1.8 Ma.
Homo at Mojokerto.
Okidoki?
Still following?
How did they disperse to these places?
Through your savanna??

:-D

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Only fools believe that human ancestors could not have been coastal once because there exist tsu
    ... AAT says human ancestors were waterside once. ... You say AAT is wrong, IOW, ... IYO these waterside Homo would not ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Aquatic Humans
    ... Can either the Savanna idea or the Aquatic idea be described as more ... (Note AAT is not about apiths, ... throughout their evolution were waterside, ... There's no doubt human ancestors ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Aquatic Humans
    ... (Note AAT is not about apiths, ... if by "aquatic idea" you mean the theory that human ancestors ... throughout their evolution were waterside, ... Wet Apes don't like questions. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Aquatic Humans
    ... planets not being planets. ... Can either the Savanna idea or the Aquatic idea be described as more ... if by "aquatic idea" you mean the theory that human ancestors ... throughout their evolution were waterside, ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: savanna wind-pisser (Re: A *Dry* Discussion About The OriginOf Bipedalism
    ... >> Don't you even know that peer reviews are not bad to refine existing ... > Your opinion piece in Nature was not peer reviewed. ... >> As you might know, AAT is about human ancestors. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)