Another savanna believer admits he has not arguments against AAT (Re: The Role of Water in Human Evolution
From: Marc Verhaegen (fa204466_at_skynet.be)
Date: 12/30/04
- Next message: anonymous person: "Re: Asian natural disaster or evolution in action?"
- Previous message: anonymous person: "Re: Asian natural disaster or evolution in action?"
- In reply to: Jason Eshleman: "Re: The Role of Water in Human Evolution"
- Next in thread: Rick Wagler: "Re: Another savanna believer admits he has not arguments against AAT (Re: The Role of Water in Human Evolution"
- Reply: Rick Wagler: "Re: Another savanna believer admits he has not arguments against AAT (Re: The Role of Water in Human Evolution"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 22:32:09 +0100
"Jason Eshleman" <jae@vidi.ucdavis.edu> wrote in message
news:cr1pjk$iem$1@skeeter.ucdavis.edu...
> Algis Kuliukas <algis@RiverApes.com> wrote:
> >The other line is to say 'we're not saying that the AAH is wrong, just
that the evidence you've presented and methods used to present them are,
somehow, flawed.'
> Yep. That's about the size of it.
1) The man has no arguments AAT is wrong.
2) He has no alternative to AAT.
3) Hence, according to Popper, AAT is correct - until they find evidence it
isn't correct, but if there had been such evidence, they would have provided
it years ago...
:-)
- Next message: anonymous person: "Re: Asian natural disaster or evolution in action?"
- Previous message: anonymous person: "Re: Asian natural disaster or evolution in action?"
- In reply to: Jason Eshleman: "Re: The Role of Water in Human Evolution"
- Next in thread: Rick Wagler: "Re: Another savanna believer admits he has not arguments against AAT (Re: The Role of Water in Human Evolution"
- Reply: Rick Wagler: "Re: Another savanna believer admits he has not arguments against AAT (Re: The Role of Water in Human Evolution"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|