sci.anthropology.paleo
By Thread

837 messages sorted by: [ date ]

---

Starting: 12/31/04
Ending: 01/31/05

• taste for meat nonsense Marc Verhaegen (01/30/05)
• Did Omnivority Emerge in the Earliest Years of Hominid Evolution? Jim McGinn (01/30/05)
• Big fat brain (Homo floresiensis) Mario Petrinovich (01/29/05)
  • Re: Big fat brain (Homo floresiensis) James Michael Howard (01/29/05)
    • Re: Big fat brain (Homo floresiensis) Mario Petrinovich (01/29/05)
    • Re: Big fat brain (Homo floresiensis) Roger Bagula (01/29/05)
      • Re: Big fat brain (Homo floresiensis) Mario Petrinovich (01/30/05)
• Fire shapes global vegetation Mario Petrinovich (01/29/05)
  • Re: Fire shapes global vegetation mark_at_spiznet.com (01/29/05)
    • Re: Fire shapes global vegetation Mario Petrinovich (01/30/05)
  • Re: Fire shapes global vegetation Val Lentz (01/30/05)
• the more "professional", the more lunatic... :-D Marc Verhaegen (01/28/05)
• Re: Only idiots believe that Homo evolved longer airways to run over the savanna Marc Verhaegen (01/27/05)
• Pheromone Effects On Humans Rich Travsky (01/27/05)
  • Re: Pheromone Effects On Humans firstjois (01/30/05)
• Article: Hominid inbreeding left humans vulnerable to disease Robert Karl Stonjek (01/27/05)
• Article: Taste for meat made humans early weaners Robert Karl Stonjek (01/27/05)
  • Re: Article: Taste for meat made humans early weaners Kaz (01/28/05)
  • Re: Article: Taste for meat made humans early weaners firstjois (01/30/05)
    • Re: Article: Taste for meat made humans early weaners Aardvark J. Bandersnatch, MP, LP, BLT, ETC. (01/30/05)
• why the dry apers fail so miserably Marc Verhaegen (01/27/05)
• Homo Floresiensis Small Brain vs. Capability Conundrum adishavit_at_gmail.com (01/26/05)
  • Re: Homo Floresiensis Small Brain vs. Capability Conundrum deowll (01/27/05)
    • Re: Homo Floresiensis Small Brain vs. Capability Conundrum adishavit_at_gmail.com (01/28/05)
  • Re: Homo Floresiensis Small Brain vs. Capability Conundrum Lee Olsen (01/27/05)
• Hominid Inbreeding And The Bottleneck Rich Travsky (01/26/05)
  • Re: Hominid Inbreeding And The Bottleneck Kaz (01/28/05)
    • Re: Hominid Inbreeding And The Bottleneck Val Lentz (01/29/05)
      • Re: Hominid Inbreeding And The Bottleneck pete (01/29/05)
• join rythmomachy_at_hotpop.com (01/26/05)
• "Something To Think About" on 7-29-96 ercaen (01/26/05)
• test message sci.anthropology.paleo Hormel Trappitus (01/26/05)
• An interesting parallel. . . . . . Bob Keeter (01/25/05)
  • Re: An interesting parallel. . . . . . John Roth (01/25/05)
  • Re: An interesting parallel. . . . . . Kaz (01/29/05)
    • Re: An interesting parallel. . . . . . Val Lentz (01/30/05)
      • Re: An interesting parallel. . . . . . Bob Keeter (01/30/05)
• Whales May Be Related To Hippos Rich Travsky (01/24/05)
  • Re: Whales May Be Related To Hippos Andrew Glasgow (01/27/05)
    • When Man Be Related To Hippos mark_at_spiznet.com (01/27/05)
• What's More Idiotic? Jim McGinn (01/22/05)
  • Re: What's More Idiotic? jae_at_ucdavis.edu (01/22/05)
  • Re: What's More Idiotic? Rick Wagler (01/23/05)
    • Re: What's More Idiotic? Algis Kuliukas (01/23/05)
    • Re: What's More Idiotic? Jim McGinn (01/23/05)
    • Re: What's More Idiotic? Paul Crowley (01/23/05)
• MGC in Owl monkies Dunk (01/22/05)
  • Re: MGC in Owl monkies Dunk (01/22/05)
    • Re: MGC in Owl monkies Philip Deitiker (01/22/05)
      • Re: MGC in Owl monkies John Wilkins (01/23/05)
      • Re: MGC in Owl monkies pete (01/23/05)
      • Re: MGC in Owl monkies Philip Deitiker (01/23/05)
• Re: The Fist Glacial Maximum in North America John Wilkins (01/21/05)
  • Re: The Fist Glacial Maximum in North America icycalmca_at_yahoo.com (01/22/05)
    • Re: The Fist Glacial Maximum in North America Philip Deitiker (01/22/05)
      • Re: The Fist Glacial Maximum in North America Daryl Krupa (01/23/05)
      • Re: The Fist Glacial Maximum in North America Philip Deitiker (01/24/05)
      • Re: The Fist Glacial Maximum in North America Daryl Krupa (01/24/05)
      • Re: The Fist Glacial Maximum in North America Daryl Krupa (01/25/05)
      • Re: The Fist Glacial Maximum in North America Daryl Krupa (01/25/05)
      • Re: The Fist Glacial Maximum in North America Daryl Krupa (01/24/05)
• Wisc primate info Michael Clark (01/21/05)
• PENGUINS PENGUINS PENGUINS fly_at_mailinator.com (01/21/05)
• Gender and migration Dunk (01/20/05)
• What We Know Jim McGinn (01/20/05)
• Nature: New ramidus Finds Rich Travsky (01/19/05)
• Ardip c 4.4 Ma herbivorous in swamps-woods :-) Marc Verhaegen (01/19/05)
  • Re: Ardip c 4.4 Ma herbivorous in woodland/grassland not swamps :-) Rich Travsky (01/19/05)
    • Re: Ardip c 4.4 Ma herbivorous in woodland/grassland not swamps :-) Marc Verhaegen (01/20/05)
      • Re: Ardip c 4.4 Ma herbivorous in woodland/grassland not swamps :-) Rich Travsky (01/26/05)
      • Re: Ardip c 4.4 Ma herbivorous in woodland/grassland/swamps :-) Marc Verhaegen (01/26/05)
    • Re: Ardip c 4.4 Ma herbivorous in woodland/grassland not swamps :-) John Roth (01/20/05)
  • Ardip c 4.4 Ma herbivorous in swamps-woods :-) mark_at_spiznet.com (01/19/05)
  • Re: Ardip c 4.4 Ma herbivorous in swamps-woods :-) Jim McGinn (01/26/05)
• Proving that a human is only able to throw overarm, not monkeys nor apes Archimedes Plutonium (01/19/05)
  • Re: Proving that a human is only able to throw overarm, not monkeys nor apes Archimedes Plutonium (01/20/05)
    • Re: Proving that a human is only able to throw overarm, not monkeys nor apes operator jay (01/21/05)
      • Re: Proving that a human is only able to throw overarm, not monkeys nor apes Philip Deitiker (01/21/05)
• Two New Lemur Species Found Rich Travsky (01/19/05)
• Evolution & a Moral Standard. Benign (01/19/05)
  • Re: Evolution & a Moral Standard. Michael Clark (01/19/05)
    • Re: Evolution & a Moral Standard. Benign (01/19/05)
      • Re: Evolution & a Moral Standard. Paul Crowley (01/19/05)
    • Re: Evolution & a Moral Standard. Benign (01/19/05)
  • Re: Evolution & a Moral Standard. Jim McGinn (01/19/05)
• Why Language? Better Hunting Coordination? firstjois (01/19/05)
  • Re: Why Language? Better Hunting Coordination? Benign (01/19/05)
    • Re: Why Language? Better Hunting Coordination? Michael Clark (01/19/05)
  • Re: Why Language? Better Hunting Coordination? Benign (01/19/05)
  • Re: Why Language? Better Hunting Coordination? deowll (01/19/05)
    • Re: Why Language? Better Hunting Coordination? pete (01/19/05)
      • Re: Why Language? Better Hunting Coordination? John Roth (01/19/05)
  • Re: Why Language? Better Hunting Coordination? Val Lentz (01/19/05)
    • Re: Why Language? Better Hunting Coordination? John Roth (01/19/05)
    • Re: Why Language? Better Hunting Coordination? Marc Verhaegen (01/19/05)
• 61% of Americans believe what? Philip Deitiker (01/18/05)
  • Re: 61% of Americans believe what? firstjois (01/19/05)
    • Re: 61% of Americans believe what? Philip Deitiker (01/19/05)
      • Re: 61% of Americans believe what? firstjois (01/20/05)
      • Re: 61% of Americans believe what? Philip Deitiker (01/20/05)
      • Re: 61% of Americans believe what? Kaz (01/28/05)
    • Re: 61% of Americans believe what? Michael Clark (01/19/05)
      • 61% of Americans believe what? mark_at_spiznet.com (01/19/05)
      • Re: 61% of Americans believe what? firstjois (01/20/05)
      • Re: 61% of Americans believe what? Michael Clark (01/20/05)
      • Re: 61% of Americans believe what? Kaz (01/28/05)
    • Re: 61% of Americans believe what? Dunk (01/20/05)
• Archimedes Plutonium is a CIA stooly Edmund Fitzgerald (01/18/05)
• defining overarm throwing from underarm Re: Rotator-Cuff Re: The "talus" bone the signature for Stonethrowing?? Archimedes Plutonium (01/18/05)
• Occam's Razor on NOVA's Piltdown Hoax; did Dawson die of natural causes? Archimedes Plutonium (01/17/05)
  • Re: Occam's Razor on NOVA's Piltdown Hoax; did Dawson die of natural causes? Archimedes Plutonium (01/17/05)
  • Re: Occam's Razor on NOVA's Piltdown Hoax; did Dawson die of natural causes? deowll (01/17/05)
    • Re: Occam's Razor on NOVA's Piltdown Hoax; did Dawson die of natural causes? Archimedes Plutonium (01/18/05)
    • Re: Occam's Razor on NOVA's Piltdown Hoax; did Dawson die of natural causes? Jonathan Sivier (01/18/05)
      • Re: Occam's Razor on NOVA's Piltdown Hoax; did Dawson die of natural causes? Philip Deitiker (01/18/05)
  • Re: Occam's Razor on NOVA's Piltdown Hoax; did Dawson die of natural causes? Archimedes Plutonium (01/18/05)
    • the cause of Dawson's death-- no-one knows Re: Occam's Razor on NOVA's Piltdown Hoax; did Dawson die of natural causes? Archimedes Plutonium (01/18/05)
      • Re: the cause of Dawson's death-- no-one knows Re: Occam's Razor on NOVA's Piltdown Hoax; did Dawson die of natural causes? Philip Deitiker (01/18/05)
      • Re: the cause of Dawson's death-- no-one knows Re: Occam's Razor on NOVA's Piltdown Hoax; did Dawson die of natural causes? firstjois (01/19/05)
      • Re: the cause of Dawson's death-- no-one knows Re: Occam's Razor on NOVA's Piltdown Hoax; did Dawson die of natural causes? Philip Deitiker (01/19/05)
      • Re: the cause of Dawson's death-- no-one knows Re: Occam's Razor on NOVA's Piltdown Hoax; did Dawson die of natural causes? Rich Travsky (01/18/05)
      • Re: the cause of Dawson's death-- no-one knows Re: Occam's Razor on NOVA's Piltdown Hoax; did Dawson die of natural causes? Philip Deitiker (01/18/05)
  • Re: Occam's Razor on NOVA's Piltdown Hoax; did Dawson die of natural causes? Lee Olsen (01/18/05)
• Early Origins of Hominid Cooperation Jim McGinn (01/16/05)
  • Re: Early Origins of Hominid Cooperation Val Lentz (01/16/05)
    • Re: Early Origins of Hominid Cooperation Jim McGinn (01/17/05)
      • Re: Early Origins of Hominid Cooperation Val Lentz (01/17/05)
      • Re: Early Origins of Hominid Cooperation Jim McGinn (01/17/05)
  • Re: Early Origins of Hominid Cooperation Paul Crowley (01/16/05)
    • Re: Early Origins of Hominid Cooperation Jim McGinn (01/17/05)
    • Re: Early Origins of Hominid Cooperation Benign (01/19/05)
• Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Bob Keeter (01/16/05)
  • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Jim McGinn (01/16/05)
  • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! John Roth (01/16/05)
    • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Jim McGinn (01/16/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Paul Crowley (01/16/05)
    • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Bob Keeter (01/17/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! John Roth (01/17/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Benign (01/19/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Jim McGinn (01/19/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! John Roth (01/20/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Jim McGinn (01/20/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Paul Crowley (01/20/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Val Lentz (01/21/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Philip Deitiker (01/21/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Paul Crowley (01/21/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Jim McGinn (01/21/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Val Lentz (01/23/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Paul Crowley (01/23/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Jim McGinn (01/24/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Val Lentz (01/25/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Paul Crowley (01/25/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Jim McGinn (01/26/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Paul Crowley (01/26/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Jim McGinn (01/27/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Paul Crowley (01/27/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Val Lentz (01/29/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Jim McGinn (01/29/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Paul Crowley (01/29/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Val Lentz (01/30/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Jim McGinn (01/29/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Paul Crowley (01/29/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Jim McGinn (01/29/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Paul Crowley (01/30/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Jim McGinn (01/30/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Jim McGinn (01/26/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! James Michael Howard (01/26/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Jim McGinn (01/26/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! John Roth (01/21/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Val Lentz (01/23/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Jim McGinn (01/21/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Val Lentz (01/23/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Jim McGinn (01/23/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Val Lentz (01/23/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Jim McGinn (01/23/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Val Lentz (01/25/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Michael Clark (01/23/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Val Lentz (01/23/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Michael Clark (01/24/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Jim McGinn (01/24/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Val Lentz (01/25/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Jim McGinn (01/26/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Val Lentz (01/25/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! John Roth (01/21/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Jim McGinn (01/21/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Paul Crowley (01/22/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Jim McGinn (01/23/05)
      • Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint! Jim McGinn (01/21/05)
• reconstructing human evolution: using all the evidence Marc Verhaegen (01/16/05)
• penguins are the best birdssssssssdsfaaaaaaaaaaaaa fqzvccylqlo_at_mailinator.com (01/14/05)
  • Re: penguins are the best birdssssssssdsfaaaaaaaaaaaaa oookhc_at_hotmail.com (01/22/05)
• Phaistos Disk Steve (01/14/05)
  • Re: Phaistos Disk grapheus_at_www.com (01/14/05)
• In Nature: Body Doubles firstjois (01/14/05)
• In Nature Cave paintings & Microbial attack firstjois (01/14/05)
• Hyper-reductionism gone mad? - "Hominins are a single lineage" Ross Macfarlane (01/14/05)
  • Re: Hyper-reductionism gone mad? - "Hominins are a single lineage" firstjois (01/14/05)
    • Re: Hyper-reductionism gone mad? - "Hominins are a single lineage" Sir Ralph E. Kelley (01/14/05)
    • Re: Hyper-reductionism gone mad? - "Hominins are a single lineage" Dar Habel (01/14/05)
  • Re: Hyper-reductionism gone mad? - "Hominins are a single lineage" Val Lentz (01/14/05)
    • Re: Hyper-reductionism gone mad? - "Hominins are a single lineage" Ross Macfarlane (01/14/05)
      • Re: Hyper-reductionism gone mad? - "Hominins are a single lineage" Val Lentz (01/14/05)
      • Re: Hyper-reductionism gone mad? - "Hominins are a single lineage" John Wilkins (01/14/05)
      • Re: Hyper-reductionism gone mad? - "Hominins are a single lineage" Bob Keeter (01/14/05)
  • Re: Hyper-reductionism gone mad? - "Hominins are a single lineage" Val Lentz (01/15/05)
    • Re: Hyper-reductionism gone mad? - "Hominins are a single lineage" Philip Deitiker (01/15/05)
      • Re: Hyper-reductionism gone mad? - "Hominins are a single lineage" Val Lentz (01/16/05)
      • Re: Hyper-reductionism gone mad? - "Hominins are a single lineage" Philip Deitiker (01/17/05)
• Adolescent archaics or adult moderns? Ross Macfarlane (01/14/05)
• Penguins ARE THE BEST BIRDS hablaba_at_webtv.net (01/12/05)
  • Re: Penguins ARE THE BEST BIRDS deowll (01/17/05)
    • Re: Penguins ARE THE BEST BIRDS Michael Clark (01/18/05)
      • Re: Penguins ARE THE BEST BIRDS Rich Travsky (01/18/05)
      • Re: Penguins ARE THE BEST BIRDS Michael Clark (01/18/05)
      • Re: Penguins ARE THE BEST BIRDS Philip Deitiker (01/18/05)
      • Re: Penguins ARE THE BEST BIRDS Ross Macfarlane (01/18/05)
      • Re: Penguins ARE THE BEST BIRDS Ross Macfarlane (01/18/05)
      • Re: Penguins ARE THE BEST BIRDS deowll (01/19/05)
    • Re: Penguins ARE THE BEST BIRDS Philip Deitiker (01/18/05)
      • Re: Penguins ARE THE BEST BIRDS deowll (01/19/05)
      • Re: Penguins ARE THE BEST BIRDS Philip Deitiker (01/19/05)
• Penguins ARE THE BEST BIRDS hablaba_at_webtv.net (01/12/05)
• Otzi In The News Again Rich Travsky (01/12/05)
  • Re: Otzi In The News Again pete (01/12/05)
    • Re: Otzi In The News Again Philip Deitiker (01/13/05)
• Lost Apes Of The Congo Ross Macfarlane (01/11/05)
• Re: Duke Primate Research Center Charles (01/11/05)
• Gene clue to HIV origin in humans Paul Crowley (01/10/05)
  • Re: Gene clue to HIV origin in humans Paul Crowley (01/10/05)
    • Re: Gene clue to HIV origin in humans xyzer_at_hotmail.com (01/11/05)
    • Re: Gene clue to HIV origin in humans Paul Crowley (01/12/05)
• Brain Processing Of Whistle Language Rich Travsky (01/10/05)
• Re: New archaeological evidence casts doubt on mega-tsunami theory of Minoan collapse Philip Deitiker (01/08/05)
  • Re: New archaeological evidence casts doubt on mega-tsunami theory of Minoan collapse Seppo Renfors (01/10/05)
• big Little Foot News Rich Travsky (01/08/05)
  • Re: big Little Foot News Dar_83001_at_yahoo.com (01/08/05)
    • Re: big Little Foot News Philip Deitiker (01/08/05)
      • Re: big Little Foot News Dar Habel (01/09/05)
      • Re: big Little Foot News Philip Deitiker (01/09/05)
      • tuang & other nonsense (Re: big Little Foot News Marc Verhaegen (01/09/05)
      • Re: tuang & other nonsense (Re: big Little Foot News mclark (01/09/05)
      • Re: tuang & other nonsense (Re: big Little Foot News Marc Verhaegen (01/09/05)
• fat & fur Marc Verhaegen (01/07/05)
• Re: Are Scientists AFRAID of Ed Conrad? pete (01/07/05)
• Re: Archaeological Dig Uncovers Ancient Race Of Skeleton People pete (01/07/05)
• Origins of Fire in Primitive Society Crow Magnon (01/07/05)
• Origins of Fire in Primitive Society Crow Magnon (01/07/05)
• Stonethrowing most compelling behaviour to create language Archimedes Plutonium (01/06/05)
  • Re: Stonethrowing most compelling behaviour to create language Archimedes Plutonium (01/10/05)
    • Re: Stonethrowing most compelling behaviour to create language Val Lentz (01/11/05)
      • Re: Stonethrowing most compelling behaviour to create language Archimedes Plutonium (01/11/05)
      • Re: Stonethrowing most compelling behaviour to create language Val Lentz (01/12/05)
      • Re: Stonethrowing most compelling behaviour to create language Aardvark J. Bandersnatch, MP, LP, BLT, ETC. (01/13/05)
      • Re: Stonethrowing most compelling behaviour to create language Archimedes Plutonium (01/13/05)
      • Re: Stonethrowing most compelling behaviour to create language Val Lentz (01/14/05)
      • Re: Stonethrowing most compelling behaviour to create language Aardvark J. Bandersnatch, MP, LP, BLT, ETC. (01/15/05)
      • Re: Stonethrowing most compelling behaviour to create language Archimedes Plutonium (01/16/05)
      • Re: Stonethrowing most compelling behaviour to create language Archimedes Plutonium (01/15/05)
      • Re: Stonethrowing most compelling behaviour to create language Marc Verhaegen (01/15/05)
      • Re: Stonethrowing most compelling behaviour to create language Aardvark J. Bandersnatch, MP, LP, BLT, ETC. (01/16/05)
      • Re: Stonethrowing most compelling behaviour to create language Val Lentz (01/16/05)
      • Re: Stonethrowing most compelling behaviour to create language Jim McGinn (01/16/05)
      • Re: Stonethrowing most compelling behaviour to create language Archimedes Plutonium (01/16/05)
  • Re: Stonethrowing most compelling behaviour to create language Rich Travsky (01/16/05)
• Neanderthal noses prove MORE aquatic than Hss! mark_at_spiznet.com (01/06/05)
• Neanderthal noses prove MORE aquatic than Hss! mark_at_spiznet.com (01/06/05)
• AAT = (Plio)Pleistocene Homo spread along the coasts & got a littoral diet. Marc Verhaegen (01/05/05)
  • Re: AAT = (Plio)Pleistocene Homo spread along the coasts & got a littoral diet. Algis Kuliukas (01/06/05)
    • Re: AAT = (Plio)Pleistocene Homo spread along the coasts & got a littoral diet. Marc Verhaegen (01/06/05)
      • Re: AAT = (Plio)Pleistocene Homo spread along the coasts & got a littoral diet. Algis Kuliukas (01/06/05)
      • Re: AAT = (Plio)Pleistocene Homo spread along the coasts & got a littoral diet. Mark (01/06/05)
      • Re: AAT = (Plio)Pleistocene Homo spread along the coasts & got a littoral diet. Marc Verhaegen (01/06/05)
      • Re: AAT = (Plio)Pleistocene Homo spread along the coasts & got a littoral diet. Algis Kuliukas (01/07/05)
      • Re: AAT = (Plio)Pleistocene Homo spread along the coasts & got a littoral diet. Marc Verhaegen (01/07/05)
      • Re: AAT = (Plio)Pleistocene Homo spread along the coasts & got a littoral diet. Algis Kuliukas (01/08/05)
      • Re: AAT = (Plio)Pleistocene Homo spread along the coasts & got a littoral diet. Marc Verhaegen (01/08/05)
      • Re: AAT = (Plio)Pleistocene Homo spread along the coasts & got a littoral diet. Algis Kuliukas (01/08/05)
      • Re: AAT = (Plio)Pleistocene Homo spread along the coasts & got a littoral diet. Marc Verhaegen (01/08/05)
      • Re: AAT = (Plio)Pleistocene Homo spread along the coasts & got a littoral diet. Algis Kuliukas (01/10/05)
      • Re: AAT = (Plio)Pleistocene Homo spread along the coasts & got a littoral diet. Marc Verhaegen (01/12/05)
      • Re: AAT = (Plio)Pleistocene Homo spread along the coasts & got a littoral diet. Algis Kuliukas (01/12/05)
      • Re: AAT = (Plio)Pleistocene Homo spread along the coasts & got a littoral diet. mark_at_spiznet.com (01/13/05)
      • Re: AAT = (Plio)Pleistocene Homo spread along the coasts & got a littoral diet. mclark (01/13/05)
      • Re: AAT = (Plio)Pleistocene Homo spread along the coasts & got a littoral diet. jae_at_ucdavis.edu (01/09/05)
      • apiths are fossil Afr.hominids (Re: AAT = (Plio)Pleistocene Homo spread along the coasts & got a littoral diet. Marc Verhaegen (01/09/05)
      • Re: apiths are fossil Afr.hominids (Re: AAT = (Plio)Pleistocene Homo spread along the coasts & got a littoral diet. Algis Kuliukas (01/09/05)
      • Re: apiths are fossil Afr.hominids (Re: AAT = (Plio)Pleistocene Homo spread along the coasts & got a littoral diet. jae_at_ucdavis.edu (01/10/05)
      • Re: apiths are fossil Afr.hominids (Re: AAT = (Plio)Pleistocene Homo spread along the coasts & got a littoral diet. Marc Verhaegen (01/10/05)
      • Re: apiths are fossil Afr.hominids (Re: AAT = (Plio)Pleistocene Homo spread along the coasts & got a littoral diet. Marc Verhaegen (01/10/05)
      • Re: AAT = (Plio)Pleistocene Homo spread along the coasts & got a littoral diet. Algis Kuliukas (01/09/05)
      • Re: AAT = (Plio)Pleistocene Homo spread along the coasts & got a littoral diet. Marc Verhaegen (01/10/05)
• dolphins & catastrophe Marc Verhaegen (01/05/05)
  • Re: dolphins & catastrophe mark_at_spiznet.com (01/05/05)
    • Re: dolphins & catastrophe mark_at_spiznet.com (01/05/05)
• Re: at least 2 fanatic dry apers admit they have no arguments against AAT :-D Marc Verhaegen (01/04/05)
• Re: Asian disaster or JABRIOL/Antonio L Santana/Camden NJ in action? Ivy Towerz (01/04/05)
• Re: Asian natural disaster or evolution - or is Antonio L Santana/Jabriol blaming Jehovah? Ivy Towerz (01/04/05)
• Re: Animals (and a palmist!) May Have Sensed Tsunami - Few If Any Dead Animals Found Buckland (01/03/05)
  • Re: Animals (and a palmist!) May Have Sensed Tsunami - Few If Any Dead Animals Found Rich Travsky (01/06/05)
    • Re: Animals (and a palmist!) May Have Sensed Tsunami - Few If Any Dead Animals Found John Roth (01/06/05)
• Dry vs. Wet: an endless source of idiocy Jim McGinn (01/03/05)
• please help me celine (01/03/05)
  • Re: please help me Stickems. (01/03/05)
    • Re: please help me Kadaitcha Man (01/03/05)
  • Re: please help me Kadaitcha Man (01/03/05)
  • Re: please help me dadiOH (01/03/05)
  • Re: please help me Ionizer (01/03/05)
  • Re: please help me Leda (01/03/05)
  • Re: please help me johnny hinnant (01/03/05)
  • Re: please help me Billy (01/04/05)
• Cats are aquatic Rich Travsky (01/03/05)
  • Re: Cats are aquatic Lorenzo L. Love (01/03/05)
    • Re: Cats are aquatic firstjois (01/03/05)
• Re: Do they found the missing link between apes and man ? deowll (01/03/05)
• A new 'theory' for distributing humans. Philip Deitiker (01/03/05)
  • Re: A new 'theory' for distributing humans. deowll (01/03/05)
    • Re: A new 'theory' for distributing humans. Philip Deitiker (01/03/05)
      • Re: A new 'theory' for distributing humans. deowll (01/04/05)
• Joe Public Jim McGinn (01/02/05)
  • Re: Joe Public Algis Kuliukas (01/03/05)
    • Re: Joe Public Paul Crowley (01/03/05)
      • Re: Joe Public Algis Kuliukas (01/03/05)
      • Re: Joe Public jae_at_ucdavis.edu (01/03/05)
      • Re: Joe Public Algis Kuliukas (01/04/05)
      • Re: Joe Public Michael Clark (01/04/05)
      • Re: Joe Public Rich Travsky (01/06/05)
      • Re: Joe Public Marc Verhaegen (01/06/05)
      • Re: Joe Public Algis Kuliukas (01/11/05)
      • Re: Joe Public Michael Clark (01/11/05)
      • Re: Joe Public Paul Crowley (01/11/05)
      • Re: Joe Public Rich Travsky (01/17/05)
      • Re: Joe Public Algis Kuliukas (01/17/05)
      • Re: Joe Public Michael Clark (01/17/05)
      • Re: Joe Public Rich Travsky (01/20/05)
      • dry ape talk (Re: Joe Public Marc Verhaegen (01/21/05)
      • Re: dry ape talk (Re: Joe Public Rich Travsky (01/26/05)
      • Re: dry ape talk (Re: Joe Public Marc Verhaegen (01/26/05)
      • Re: Joe Public jae_at_ucdavis.edu (01/21/05)
      • Re: Joe Public Michael Clark (01/03/05)
      • Re: Joe Public Paul Crowley (01/03/05)
      • Re: Joe Public Algis Kuliukas (01/04/05)
      • Re: Joe Public Paul Crowley (01/04/05)
      • Re: Joe Public Algis Kuliukas (01/05/05)
      • Re: Joe Public Paul Crowley (01/05/05)
      • Re: Joe Public Michael Clark (01/04/05)
      • Re: Joe Public firstjois (01/05/05)
    • Re: Joe Public Jim McGinn (01/04/05)
      • Re: Joe Public Algis Kuliukas (01/05/05)
      • Re: Joe Public Michael Clark (01/05/05)
      • Re: Joe Public Jim McGinn (01/05/05)
• Dry vs. Wet: an endless source of idiocy Jim McGinn (01/02/05)
• Ape/Monkey Split Placed At 29 to 34.5 mya Rich Travsky (01/02/05)
  • Re: Ape/Monkey Split Placed At 29 to 34.5 mya Val Lentz (01/07/05)
• The Unbearable Lightness of Elaine Jim McGinn (01/02/05)
• LOL..... I Just Found A Gwenyth Paltrow Sex Video Online. Take A Look....... 5BR4 uxvcdkvv_at_sk.com (01/01/05)
• Re: Look humans really are aquatic! Daeron (01/01/05)
• Re: human babies swim after training (Re: endurance running? Marc Verhaegen (01/01/05)
  • Re: human babies swim after training (Re: endurance running? Marc Verhaegen (01/01/05)
  • Re: human babies swim after training (Re: endurance running? Rick Wagler (01/01/05)
    • Re: human babies swim after training (Re: endurance running? Marc Verhaegen (01/01/05)
    • Re: human babies swim after training (Re: endurance running? firstjois (01/02/05)
  • Re: human babies swim after training (Re: endurance running? Rich Travsky (01/03/05)
    • Re: human babies swim after training (Re: endurance running? Marc Verhaegen (01/03/05)
      • Re: human babies swim after training (Re: endurance running? Rich Travsky (01/06/05)
      • Re: human babies swim after training (Re: endurance running? Marc Verhaegen (01/06/05)
      • Re: human babies swim after training (Re: endurance running? Rich Travsky (01/10/05)
      • Re: human babies swim after training (Re: endurance running? Marc Verhaegen (01/10/05)
      • Re: human babies swim after training (Re: endurance running? Rich Travsky (01/17/05)
      • Re: human babies swim after training (Re: endurance running? Marc Verhaegen (01/17/05)
      • Re: human babies swim after training (Re: endurance running? Rich Travsky (01/26/05)
      • humans run after 3 years, but swim after 3 minutes (Re: human babies swim after training (Re: endurance running? Marc Verhaegen (01/26/05)
• 3 "funny bone" regions of human anatomy; why 2 located in arm for Stonethrowing theory Archimedes Plutonium (01/01/05)
  • Re: 3 "funny bone" regions of human anatomy; why 2 located in arm for Stonethrowing theory Archimedes Plutonium (01/02/05)
    • 4 degrees of throwing and only 1 degree of running Re: 3 "funny bone" regions of human anatomy; why 2 located in arm for Stonethrowing theory Archimedes Plutonium (01/03/05)
      • Brow ridge degeneracy bespeaks of Stonethrowing ;Adam's apple bone in human evolution, does it aid throwing or running? Re: 4 degrees of throwing and only 1 degree of running Archimedes Plutonium (01/03/05)
• Re: Fireworks for the New Year? Algis Kuliukas (01/01/05)
• Re: The Role of Water in Human Evolution firstjois (01/01/05)
  • Re: The Role of Water in Human Evolution Algis Kuliukas (01/01/05)
    • Re: The Role of Water in Human Evolution Michael Clark (01/01/05)
    • Re: The Role of Water in Human Evolution Su Solomon (01/01/05)
      • Re: The Role of Water in Human Evolution Philip Deitiker (01/01/05)
      • Re: The Role of Water in Human Evolution mark_at_spiznet.com (01/01/05)
      • Re: The Role of Water in Human Evolution Marc Verhaegen (01/01/05)
    • Re: The Role of Water in Human Evolution Rick Wagler (01/01/05)
      • Re: The Role of Water in Human Evolution jae_at_ucdavis.edu (01/01/05)
• Re: OT tsunami firstjois (01/01/05)
• AIDS Barry Winterburn (01/01/05)
• Re: The Role of Water in Human EvolutionPENGUINS ARE THE BEST BIRDS linguist_at_mytrashmail.com (12/31/04)
• Re: Paper On Capuchin Tool Use Jim McGinn (12/31/04)
  • Re: Paper On Capuchin Tool Use John Roth (01/02/05)
    • Re: Paper On Capuchin Tool Use pete (01/07/05)
• Re: U of Chicago Researchers: Human Evolution is Categorically Distinct Jim McGinn (12/31/04)
• Head Hair Is Not Fur Re: selection criteria for obesity Rich Travsky (12/31/04)
  • Re: Head Hair Is Not Fur Re: selection criteria for obesity firstjois (01/01/05)
  • Re: Head Hair Is Not Fur Re: selection criteria for obesity Marc Verhaegen (01/01/05)
• Re: selection criteria for obesity Pauline M Ross (12/31/04)
  • Re: selection criteria for obesity firstjois (01/01/05)
    • Re: selection criteria for obesity Philip Deitiker (01/01/05)
    • Re: selection criteria for obesity Pauline M Ross (01/01/05)
  • Re: selection criteria for obesity Rich Travsky (01/01/05)
  • Re: selection criteria for obesity deowll (01/03/05)
    • Re: selection criteria for obesity Pauline M Ross (01/03/05)
      • habilis drought?? (Re: selection criteria for obesity Marc Verhaegen (01/03/05)
      • Re: selection criteria for obesity deowll (01/04/05)
      • Re: selection criteria for obesity Pauline M Ross (01/04/05)
  • Re: selection criteria for obesity firstjois (01/03/05)
    • Re: selection criteria for obesity deowll (01/04/05)
    • Re: selection criteria for obesity Charles (01/04/05)
  • Re: selection criteria for obesity firstjois (01/03/05)
    • Re: selection criteria for obesity deowll (01/04/05)
    • Re: selection criteria for obesity Charles (01/04/05)
      • Re: selection criteria for obesity Pauline M Ross (01/04/05)
      • Re: selection criteria for obesity Charles (01/05/05)
• dry apers claim wildebeest can dive 50 m (Re: Look humans really are aquatic! Marc Verhaegen (12/31/04)
• Re: endurance running? Marc Verhaegen (12/31/04)
  • Re: endurance running? Rich Travsky (01/03/05)
    • Re: endurance running? firstjois (01/03/05)
    • Re: endurance running? Marc Verhaegen (01/03/05)
      • Re: endurance running? Rich Travsky (01/06/05)
      • Re: endurance running? Marc Verhaegen (01/06/05)
      • Re: endurance running? Rich Travsky (01/10/05)
      • Re: endurance running? Marc Verhaegen (01/10/05)
      • Re: endurance running? Rich Travsky (01/17/05)
      • Re: endurance running? firstjois (01/17/05)
      • Re: endurance running? Marc Verhaegen (01/17/05)
      • Re: endurance running? Rich Travsky (01/26/05)
      • Re: endurance running? Marc Verhaegen (01/26/05)
      • Re: endurance running? firstjois (01/06/05)
• dry apers believe aquatic apes lived in houses (Re: MV is the most published author of SAP Marc Verhaegen (12/31/04)
  • Only an idiot believes that dry apers believe aquatic apes lived in houses mark_at_spiznet.com (01/01/05)
    • Re: Only an idiot believes that dry apers don't believe aquatic apes lived in houses mark_at_spiznet.com (01/02/05)
      • Re: Only an idiot believes that dry apers don't believe aquatic apes lived in houses mark_at_spiznet.com (01/04/05)
  • Re: wet apers believe aquatic apes lived entirely in water (Re: MV is the most published author of SAP Rich Travsky (01/03/05)
    • Re: wet apers believe aquatic apes lived entirely in water firstjois (01/03/05)
    • Re: wet apers believe aquatic apes lived entirely in water (Re: MV is the most published author of SAP Marc Verhaegen (01/03/05)
      • Re: wet apers believe aquatic apes lived entirely in water (Re: MV is the most published author of SAP Rich Travsky (01/06/05)
      • dry apers believe human ancestors got long noses to run over the savannan (Re: wet apers believe aquatic apes lived entirely in water (Re: MV is the most published author of SAP Marc Verhaegen (01/06/05)
      • Re: dry apers believe human ancestors got long noses to run over the savannan (Re: wet apers believe aquatic apes lived entirely in water (Re: MV is the most published author of SAP Rich Travsky (01/10/05)
• Re: Only idiots believe that humans evolved snorkel noses to run after gazelles Marc Verhaegen (12/31/04)
  • Re: Only idiots believe that humans evolved snorkel noses to run after gazelles Rich Travsky (01/03/05)
    • Re: Only idiots believe that humans evolved snorkel noses to run after gazelles Marc Verhaegen (01/03/05)
      • Re: Only idiots believe that humans evolved snorkel noses to run after gazelles Rich Travsky (01/06/05)
      • Re: Only idiots believe that humans evolved snorkel noses to run after gazelles Marc Verhaegen (01/06/05)
      • Re: Only idiots believe that humans evolved snorkel noses to run after gazelles Rich Travsky (01/10/05)
      • Re: Only idiots believe that humans evolved snorkel noses to run after gazelles Marc Verhaegen (01/10/05)
      • Re: Only idiots believe that humans evolved snorkel noses to run after gazelles Rich Travsky (01/17/05)
      • Re: Only idiots believe that humans evolved snorkel noses to run after gazelles Marc Verhaegen (01/17/05)
      • Re: Only idiots believe that humans evolved snorkel noses to run after gazelles Kaz (01/19/05)
      • Re: Only idiots believe that humans evolved snorkel noses to run after gazelles Ross Macfarlane (01/20/05)
      • Re: Only idiots believe that humans evolved snorkel noses to run after gazelles firstjois (01/20/05)
      • Re: Only idiots believe that humans evolved snorkel noses to run after gazelles Marc Verhaegen (01/21/05)
      • Re: Only idiots believe that humans evolved snorkel noses to run after gazelles Kaz (01/27/05)
      • Re: Only idiots believe that humans evolved snorkel noses to run after gazelles Marc Verhaegen (01/27/05)
      • Re: Only idiots believe that humans evolved snorkel noses to run after gazelles Marc Verhaegen (01/21/05)
      • Re: Only idiots believe that humans evolved snorkel noses to run after gazelles Kaz (01/27/05)
      • Re: Only idiots believe that humans evolved snorkel noses to run after gazelles Marc Verhaegen (01/27/05)
      • Re: Only idiots believe that humans evolved snorkel noses to run after gazelles Kaz (01/28/05)
      • Re: Only idiots believe that humans evolved snorkel noses to run after gazelles Marc Verhaegen (01/28/05)
      • Re: Only idiots believe that humans evolved snorkel noses to run after gazelles Kaz (01/27/05)
      • Re: Only idiots believe that humans evolved snorkel noses to run after gazelles Kaz (01/28/05)
      • Re: Only idiots believe that humans evolved snorkel noses to run after gazelles Marc Verhaegen (01/28/05)
      • Re: Only idiots believe in snorkel noses Rich Travsky (01/26/05)
      • Re: Only idiots believe that Homo evolved longerairways to run over the savanna Marc Verhaegen (01/26/05)
      • Re: Only idiots believe that Homo evolved longerairways to run over the savanna Kaz (01/27/05)
      • Re: Only idiots believe that humans evolved snorkel noses to run after gazelles firstjois (01/10/05)
• Re: Neanderthal noses as an 'aquatic' adapatation? Marc Verhaegen (12/31/04)
  • Re: Neanderthal noses as an 'aquatic' adapatation? Rick Wagler (01/01/05)
    • Re: Neanderthal noses as an 'aquatic' adapatation? pete (01/06/05)
      • Re: Neanderthal noses as an 'aquatic' adapatation? Rick Wagler (01/24/05)
  • Re: Neanderthal noses as an 'aquatic' adapatation? Algis Kuliukas (01/02/05)
    • Re: Neanderthal noses as an 'aquatic' adapatation? Rick Wagler (01/02/05)
      • Re: Neanderthal noses as an 'aquatic' adapatation? Algis Kuliukas (01/03/05)
      • Only fools believe that humans evolved abundant sweat glands to cool in the savanna (where water & sodium are scarce). (Re: Neanderthal noses as an 'aquatic' adapatation? Marc Verhaegen (01/03/05)
      • Re: Neanderthal noses as an 'aquatic' adapatation? Rick Wagler (01/24/05)
    • Re: Neanderthal noses as an 'aquatic' adapatation? jae_at_ucdavis.edu (01/02/05)
      • Re: Neanderthal noses as an 'aquatic' adapatation? Algis Kuliukas (01/03/05)
    • Re: Neanderthal noses as an 'aquatic' adapatation? Paul Crowley (01/02/05)
  • Re: Neanderthal noses as an 'aquatic' adapatation? Rich Travsky (01/03/05)
    • Re: Neanderthal noses as an 'aquatic' adapatation? Marc Verhaegen (01/03/05)
      • Re: Neanderthal noses as an 'aquatic' adapatation? Rich Travsky (01/06/05)
      • Re: Neanderthal noses as an 'aquatic' adapatation? Marc Verhaegen (01/06/05)
      • Re: Neanderthal noses as an 'aquatic' adapatation? Rich Travsky (01/10/05)
      • Re: Neanderthal noses as an 'aquatic' adapatation? Marc Verhaegen (01/10/05)
      • Re: Neanderthal noses as an 'aquatic' adapatation? mclark (01/12/05)
      • Re: Neanderthal noses as an 'aquatic' adapatation? Rich Travsky (01/17/05)
      • Re: Neanderthal noses as an 'aquatic' adapatation? Marc Verhaegen (01/17/05)
      • Re: Neanderthal noses as an 'aquatic' adapatation? Rich Travsky (01/26/05)
      • Re: Neanderthal noses as an 'aquatic' adapatation? Marc Verhaegen (01/26/05)
  • Re: Neanderthal noses as an 'aquatic' adapatation? mark_at_spiznet.com (01/17/05)
    • Re: Neanderthal noses as an 'aquatic' adapatation? Rich Travsky (01/17/05)
• imbeciles claim that nose lengtening is for running after gazelles (Re: Marc = liar & fool ( Re: Neanderthal noses as an 'aquatic' adapatation? Marc Verhaegen (12/31/04)
  • Re: imbeciles claim that nose lengtening is for running after gazelles (Re: Marc = liar & fool ( Re: Neanderthal noses as an 'aquatic' adapatation? Rich Travsky (01/03/05)
    • Re: imbeciles claim that nose lengtening is for running after gazelles (Re: Marc = liar & fool ( Re: Neanderthal noses as an 'aquatic' adapatation? Marc Verhaegen (01/03/05)
      • Re: imbeciles claim that nose lengtening is for running after gazelles (Re: Marc = liar & fool ( Re: Neanderthal noses as an 'aquatic' adapatation? Rich Travsky (01/06/05)
      • Re: imbeciles claim that nose lengtening is for running after gazelles (Re: Marc = liar & fool ( Re: Neanderthal noses as an 'aquatic' adapatation? Marc Verhaegen (01/06/05)
      • Re: imbeciles claim that nose lengtening is for running after gazelles (Re: Marc = liar & fool ( Re: Neanderthal noses as an 'aquatic' adapatation? Rich Travsky (01/10/05)
      • Re: imbeciles claim that nose lengtening is for running after gazelles (Re: Marc = liar & fool ( Re: Neanderthal noses as an 'aquatic' adapatation? Marc Verhaegen (01/10/05)
      • Re: imbeciles claim that nose lengtening is for running after gazelles (Re: Marc = liar & fool ( Re: Neanderthal noses as an 'aquatic' adapatation? Rich Travsky (01/17/05)
      • Re: imbeciles claim that nose lengtening is for running after gazelles (Re: Marc = liar & fool ( Re: Neanderthal noses as an 'aquatic' adapatation? Marc Verhaegen (01/17/05)
      • Re: imbeciles claim that nose lengtening is for sucking molluscs (Re: Marc = liar & fool ( Re: Neanderthal noses as an 'aquatic' adapatation? Rich Travsky (01/26/05)
      • only imbeciles claim that nose lengtening is for running over the plains (Re: Marc = liar & fool ( Re: Neanderthal noses as an 'aquatic' adapatation? Marc Verhaegen (01/26/05)
• Re: only fools believe that masticatory reduction can't be for molluscs Marc Verhaegen (12/31/04)
  • Re: only fools believe that masticatory reduction can't be for molluscs Rich Travsky (01/03/05)
    • Re: only fools believe that masticatory reduction can't be for molluscs Marc Verhaegen (01/03/05)
      • Re: only fools believe that masticatory reduction is for molluscs Rich Travsky (01/06/05)
      • Re: only fools believe that masticatory reduction is for eating savanna antelopes Marc Verhaegen (01/06/05)
      • Re: only fools believe that masticatory reduction is for eating savanna antelopes Rich Travsky (01/10/05)
• antiAATers deny importance of adaptation (Re: The Role of Water in Human Evolution Marc Verhaegen (12/31/04)
• Re: dry apers claim lions & wildebeest can dive 50 m (Re: Look humans really are aquatic! Marc Verhaegen (12/31/04)
  • Re: dry apers claim lions & wildebeest can dive 50 m (Re: Look humans really are aquatic! Pauline M Ross (12/31/04)
    • Re: dry apers claim lions & wildebeest can dive 50 m (Re: Look humans really are aquatic! Marc Verhaegen (01/01/05)
    • Re: dry apers claim lions & wildebeest can dive 50 m (Re: Look humans really are aquatic! Rick Wagler (01/01/05)
• Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. jae_at_ucdavis.edu (12/31/04)
  • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Marc Verhaegen (12/31/04)
    • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (12/31/04)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Marc Verhaegen (12/31/04)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (12/31/04)
      • bipedalism (Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Marc Verhaegen (01/02/05)
    • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (12/31/04)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Rick Wagler (12/31/04)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Marc Verhaegen (01/01/05)
  • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (12/31/04)
    • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Jason Eshleman (12/31/04)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/01/05)
      • Is the AAH a legitimate hypothese is? Of course it's. mark_at_spiznet.com (01/01/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothese is? Nyah NYAH Nyaha! firstjois (01/02/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Su Solomon (01/01/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. jae_at_ucdavis.edu (01/01/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/02/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Paul Crowley (01/02/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Rich Travsky (01/03/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/03/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Rich Travsky (01/03/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/03/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Paul Crowley (01/03/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/03/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. jae_at_ucdavis.edu (01/02/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/03/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Rich Travsky (01/03/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/03/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Rich Travsky (01/06/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. jae_at_ucdavis.edu (01/03/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/03/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. jae_at_ucdavis.edu (01/03/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/04/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. jae_at_ucdavis.edu (01/04/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/05/05)
      • Chimps can swim, actually rmacfarl (01/04/05)
      • Re: Chimps can swim, actually Algis Kuliukas (01/05/05)
      • Re: Chimps can swim, actually firstjois (01/05/05)
      • Re: Chimps can swim, actually rmacfarl (01/05/05)
      • Re: Chimps can swim, actually Jason Eshleman (01/05/05)
      • Re: Chimps can swim, actually deowll (01/08/05)
      • Re: Chimps can swim, actually Philip Deitiker (01/08/05)
      • Humans can climb, actually (Re: Chimps can swim, actually Marc Verhaegen (01/08/05)
      • Re: Humans can climb, actually (Re: Chimps can swim, actually Rich Travsky (01/10/05)
      • Re: Humans can climb, actually (Re: Chimps can swim, actually Marc Verhaegen (01/10/05)
      • Re: Humans can climb, actually (Re: Chimps can swim, actually Rich Travsky (01/17/05)
      • Re: Humans can climb, actually (Re: Chimps can swim, actually Marc Verhaegen (01/17/05)
      • Re: Humans can climb, actually (Re: Chimps can swim, actually Rich Travsky (01/26/05)
      • Re: Humans can climb, actually (Re: Chimps can swim, actually Kaz (01/28/05)
      • Re: Humans can climb, actually (Re: Chimps can swim, actually Marc Verhaegen (01/29/05)
      • Re: Chimps can swim, actually Rich Travsky (01/10/05)
      • Re: Chimps can swim, actually firstjois (01/10/05)
      • Re: Chimps can swim, actually rmacfarl (01/05/05)
      • Re: Chimps can swim, actually Philip Deitiker (01/05/05)
      • Re: Chimps can swim, actually Algis Kuliukas (01/05/05)
      • Re: Chimps can swim, actually Jason Eshleman (01/05/05)
      • Re: Chimps can swim, actually firstjois (01/07/05)
      • Re: Chimps can swim, actually Philip Deitiker (01/05/05)
      • Re: Chimps can swim, actually Michael Clark (01/05/05)
      • Re: Chimps can swim, actually Algis Kuliukas (01/05/05)
      • Re: Chimps can swim, actually firstjois (01/07/05)
      • Re: Chimps can swim, actually firstjois (01/07/05)
      • Re: Chimps can swim, actually Philip Deitiker (01/08/05)
      • walking learned....was Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Charles (01/04/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Rich Travsky (01/03/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/03/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Marc Verhaegen (01/03/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/05/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Marc Verhaegen (01/05/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Rich Travsky (01/05/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/05/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Marc Verhaegen (01/05/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it isn't. firstjois (01/06/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Rich Travsky (01/09/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Philip Deitiker (01/09/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. firstjois (01/10/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Philip Deitiker (01/10/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/10/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Jason Eshleman (01/10/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/11/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. jae_at_ucdavis.edu (01/11/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/11/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. jae_at_ucdavis.edu (01/11/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/14/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/14/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. pete (01/14/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/15/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. jae_at_ucdavis.edu (01/14/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Bob Keeter (01/14/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/15/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. jae_at_ucdavis.edu (01/15/05)
      • Sweating is a dryland, not an aquatic adaptation in humans. Philip Deitiker (01/15/05)
      • Re: Sweating is a dryland, not an aquatic adaptation in humans. Algis Kuliukas (01/15/05)
      • Re: Sweating is a dryland, not an aquatic adaptation in humans. jae_at_ucdavis.edu (01/15/05)
      • Re: Sweating is a dryland, not an aquatic adaptation in humans. Algis Kuliukas (01/16/05)
      • Re: Sweating is a dryland, not an aquatic adaptation in humans. jae_at_ucdavis.edu (01/16/05)
      • Re: Sweating is a dryland, not an aquatic adaptation in humans. Bob Keeter (01/16/05)
      • Re: Sweating is a dryland, not an aquatic adaptation in humans. jae_at_ucdavis.edu (01/16/05)
      • Re: Sweating is a dryland, not an aquatic adaptation in humans. mark_at_spiznet.com (01/16/05)
      • Re: Sweating is a dryland, not an aquatic adaptation in humans. Bob Keeter (01/17/05)
      • Re: Sweating is a dryland, not an aquatic adaptation in humans. Bob Keeter (01/17/05)
      • Re: Sweating is a dryland, not an aquatic adaptation in humans. Marc Verhaegen (01/16/05)
      • Re: Sweating is a dryland, not an aquatic adaptation in humans. Jim McGinn (01/16/05)
      • Re: Sweating is a dryland, not an aquatic adaptation in humans. Bob Keeter (01/16/05)
      • Re: Sweating is a dryland, not an aquatic adaptation in humans. Paul Crowley (01/15/05)
      • Re: Sweating is a dryland, not an aquatic adaptation in humans. Algis Kuliukas (01/16/05)
      • Re: Sweating is a dryland, not an aquatic adaptation in humans. Ross Macfarlane (01/17/05)
      • Re: Sweating is a dryland, not an aquatic adaptation in humans. Paul Crowley (01/17/05)
      • Re: Sweating is a dryland, not an aquatic adaptation in humans. Jim McGinn (01/17/05)
      • Re: Sweating is a dryland, not an aquatic adaptation in humans. Paul Crowley (01/16/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/15/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Paul Crowley (01/15/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/15/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. jae_at_ucdavis.edu (01/15/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/16/05)
      • Eshleman = proof that "selectively deleterious mutations can persist & reach fixation in certain situations..." :-D (Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Marc Verhaegen (01/16/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. jae_at_ucdavis.edu (01/17/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/18/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. jae_at_ucdavis.edu (01/18/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Paul Crowley (01/18/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. jae_at_ucdavis.edu (01/18/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Kaz (01/19/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. firstjois (01/19/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Kaz (01/19/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. jae_at_ucdavis.edu (01/19/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/19/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. jae_at_ucdavis.edu (01/19/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Kaz (01/19/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Philip Deitiker (01/19/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Kaz (01/20/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Philip Deitiker (01/20/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Jim McGinn (01/20/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Kaz (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Marc Verhaegen (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Ross Macfarlane (01/30/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Jim McGinn (01/30/05)
      • apiths ate sedges etc. in riverbanks, swamps & lagoons (Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Marc Verhaegen (01/30/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Pauline M Ross (01/30/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Bob Keeter (01/30/05)
      • africanus' diet (Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Marc Verhaegen (01/30/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Philip Deitiker (01/20/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Rich Travsky (01/20/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Kaz (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. jae_at_ucdavis.edu (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Kaz (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. jae_at_ucdavis.edu (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. mark_at_spiznet.com (01/28/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. mclark (01/28/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. JAE (01/28/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Kaz (01/28/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Marc Verhaegen (01/28/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. JAE (01/28/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Kaz (01/28/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Marc Verhaegen (01/28/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. jae_at_ucdavis.edu (01/20/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Kaz (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. jae_at_ucdavis.edu (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Kaz (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Ross Macfarlane (01/20/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Kaz (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. firstjois (01/22/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Kaz (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Paul Crowley (01/19/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Kaz (01/19/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Philip Deitiker (01/19/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Kaz (01/19/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/21/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. jae_at_ucdavis.edu (01/21/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/22/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. jae_at_ucdavis.edu (01/22/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Kaz (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/31/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Kaz (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Su Solomon (01/28/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. JAE (01/28/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Kaz (01/28/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Kaz (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Marc Verhaegen (01/19/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Kaz (01/19/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Marc Verhaegen (01/20/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/19/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/19/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Pauline M Ross (01/19/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Marc Verhaegen (01/19/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Kaz (01/19/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Marc Verhaegen (01/20/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Paul Crowley (01/14/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/15/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Paul Crowley (01/15/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/19/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Marc Verhaegen (01/19/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Val Lentz (01/20/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Philip Deitiker (01/11/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Marc Verhaegen (01/11/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. mark_at_spiznet.com (01/11/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Philip Deitiker (01/12/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Rich Travsky (01/17/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/17/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. jae_at_ucdavis.edu (01/17/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/18/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. jae_at_ucdavis.edu (01/18/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/19/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. jae_at_ucdavis.edu (01/19/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/19/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Rich Travsky (01/20/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Marc Verhaegen (01/20/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Rich Travsky (01/26/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Marc Verhaegen (01/26/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/21/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Marc Verhaegen (01/22/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Hugh Gibbons (01/23/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Marc Verhaegen (01/23/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Marc Verhaegen (01/23/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/23/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. jae_at_ucdavis.edu (01/24/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/24/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. jae_at_ucdavis.edu (01/24/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Rich Travsky (01/26/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/31/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/24/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Rich Travsky (01/24/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Pauline M Ross (01/24/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Su Solomon (01/24/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Pauline M Ross (01/24/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Philip Deitiker (01/24/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Su Solomon (01/24/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Philip Deitiker (01/25/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimat hypo? Of course tisn't. mark_at_spiznet.com (01/25/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Bob Keeter (01/25/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Pauline M Ross (01/25/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Paul Crowley (01/25/05)
      • SC fat & brain (Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Marc Verhaegen (01/25/05)
      • Re: SC fat & brain (Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. James Michael Howard (01/25/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Bob Keeter (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Jack B (01/27/05)
      • survival of the fattest (Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Marc Verhaegen (01/27/05)
      • Re: survival of the fattest (Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Su Solomon (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Su Solomon (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Paul Crowley (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Su Solomon (01/28/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Al Zeller (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Pauline M Ross (01/28/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Bob Keeter (01/29/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Pauline M Ross (01/29/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Bob Keeter (01/29/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Joe (01/29/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Bob Keeter (01/30/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Pauline M Ross (01/30/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Bob Keeter (01/30/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/31/05)
      • Lactation Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Rich Travsky (01/25/05)
      • Re: Lactation Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Pauline M Ross (01/25/05)
      • Re: Lactation Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Rich Travsky (01/26/05)
      • Re: Lactation Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Paul Crowley (01/26/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Algis Kuliukas (01/24/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Marc Verhaegen (01/02/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Rick Wagler (01/02/05)
      • Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is. Marc Verhaegen (01/02/05)