why the dry apers fail so miserably
From: Marc Verhaegen (fa204466_at_skynet.be)
Date: 01/27/05
- Next message: Su Solomon: "Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is."
- Previous message: Marc Verhaegen: "survival of the fattest (Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:17:54 +0100
Dry apers want to explain human typical features as an exception: nakedness
to cool down while running, although no other mammal lost its fur for that
reason; SC fat for replacing a fur, although no other mammal did this; erect
posture to look over tall savanna grass; etc.etc. they create the most
far-fetched "explanations". But if they simply looked at human features as
they would do if these were present in non-human mammals, they would be no
problems: everything points into the same direction: humans were (& still
are) waterside. There are no arguments for anything else.
Marc Verhaegen
http://www.onelist.com/community/AAT
http://allserv.rug.ac.be/~mvaneech/Verhaegen.html
'Truth is the intersection of independent lines'--R.Levins 1966
- Next message: Su Solomon: "Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is."
- Previous message: Marc Verhaegen: "survival of the fattest (Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|