taste for meat nonsense
From: Marc Verhaegen (fa204466_at_skynet.be)
Date: 01/30/05
- Next message: Paul Crowley: "Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint!"
- Previous message: Pauline M Ross: "Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 13:23:03 +0100
(my comments between [ ] - MV)
Taste for meat made humans early weaners
09:30 29 January 2005
Exclusive from New Scientist Print Edition
Anna Gosline
A taste for meat prompted early humans to wean their children at a young
age. The idea explains why we now wean our infants years earlier than other
great apes.
[The idea explains nothing, but if you repeat nonsense frequently enough, al
least some people will believe it... Our locomotion, gastro-intestinal
tract, dentition etc. say we are no meat-eaters. Of course, we eat meat when
we find it, but our bodies are primarily those of omnivores, more
specifically durophagous omnivores.]
In non-industrialised societies, women breastfeed their children for an
average of two and a half years, while chimpanzees feed theirs for five.
[Yes, and chimps are the most-meat-eating apes if not primates (apart from
insectivorous primates)...]
Anthropologist Gail Kennedy of the University of California, Los Angeles,
US, suggests that humans made the transition to early weaning 2.6 million
years ago.
[Are there indications that early weaning predates agriculture?]
That was when a branch of hominids began to eat animal carcasses - a risky
activity that would have brought them into contact with other predators and
significantly raised mortality rates for the hunters.
[Is it so risky IMO to butcher stranded whales? or herbivores drowned when
crossing rivers? I guess the inland sidebranches of Homo had to feed on the
very difficult-to-obtain bone marrow (often left by carnivores), because
their seaside diet had been so rich in brain-specific fatty acids that their
large brains badly needed these. A bit of these fatty acids could be found
in bone marrow - not in meat.]
This would have created a selection pressure to wean infants earlier and
earlier, since those no longer dependent on breast milk would have been more
likely to survive their mother's death, says Kennedy.
[A prime example of wishful thinking.]
What is more, the nutritional benefit of eating meat at a younger age would
have helped children's brains to grow and develop more quickly. Human brains
grow three times quicker than those of chimpanzees.
[Yes, and that's not because we eat meat, of course, but because our
ancestors had plenty of brain-specific fatty acids in their littoral diet.]
But Barry Bogin of the University of Michigan at Dearborn, US, has a
different rationale for early weaning. He believes it allowed hominid
mothers to have more offspring. "By weaning at 30 months, we have a great
reproductive jump over our closest cousins; we can crank out two babies in
the time it takes a chimpanzee to have one," he says.
[BB confuses hominids & humans. And doesn't explain why humans could have
more offspring. Agriculture??]
Journal reference: Journal of Human Evolution (DOI:
10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.09.005)
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn6921
- Next message: Paul Crowley: "Re: Human brain on an evolutionary sprint!"
- Previous message: Pauline M Ross: "Re: Is the AAH a legitimate hypothesis? Of course it is."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|