Re: Is Oreopithicus the Aquatic Ape Link?
From: Pauline M Ross (pmross_at_ross-software.co.uk)
Date: 02/24/05
- Next message: John Roth: "Re: Article: Human 'dental chaos' linked to evolution of cooking"
- Previous message: Pauline M Ross: "Re: Is Oreopithicus the Aquatic Ape Link?"
- In reply to: rmacfarl: "Re: Is Oreopithicus the Aquatic Ape Link?"
- Next in thread: Paul Crowley: "Re: Is Oreopithicus the Aquatic Ape Link?"
- Reply: Paul Crowley: "Re: Is Oreopithicus the Aquatic Ape Link?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:09:22 +0000
On 23 Feb 2005 13:52:50 -0800, "rmacfarl" <rmacfarl@alphalink.com.au>
wrote:
>I'd suggest it's likely that the young of earliest bipeds, including
>a'piths, were much more developed than human newborns, &, like chimp &
>other primate babies, were probably well able to cling to their mothers
>from birth.
I've always thought that those curved phalanges suggestive of
tree-climbing in the Lucy-era Apiths are the best indication so far
that they were furred and had babies able to cling. You can't climb a
tree while carrying a baby in your arms.
-- Pauline Ross
- Next message: John Roth: "Re: Article: Human 'dental chaos' linked to evolution of cooking"
- Previous message: Pauline M Ross: "Re: Is Oreopithicus the Aquatic Ape Link?"
- In reply to: rmacfarl: "Re: Is Oreopithicus the Aquatic Ape Link?"
- Next in thread: Paul Crowley: "Re: Is Oreopithicus the Aquatic Ape Link?"
- Reply: Paul Crowley: "Re: Is Oreopithicus the Aquatic Ape Link?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]