Re: Is Oreopithicus the Aquatic Ape Link?

From: JAE (jae_at_ucdavis.edu)
Date: 02/24/05 

Date: 24 Feb 2005 08:10:42 -0800

Paul Crowley wrote his usual mush-brained crap:

> Of course you won't find any. You are
> merely spouting off. There's nothing
> wrong with that -- as such -- so long
> as you know what you are doing and
> you admit it. BUT why is that about the
> best that you can do? How come that
> there is not an extensive literature in
> the 'discipline' on this very matter?
>
> We all know the answer. No one has
> ever thought about it. No articles on
> it have ever appeared in the 'learned'
> journals. All for the very simple reason
> that, for the science, females and infants
> simply didn't exist. The hominid taxon
> (and its immediate ancestors) consisted
> solely of adult males.

Hey, Pauli-boy. You admitted in a previous post that you don't read
journal articles in the field. I think you said you gave it up some
time ago. So what power of omnipotence allows you to know what is and
isn't addressed by the field (and why is this omnipotence wasted on an
ass like you)?