Re: OT: Malhi, Eshleman, haplogroup A, language, time, and direction.....
From: G Horvat (g-horvat_at_shaw.ca)
Date: 03/25/05
- Previous message: Tedd Jacobs: "Re: A new early Holocene human skeleton from Brazil"
- In reply to: Lee Olsen: "Re: OT: Malhi, Eshleman, haplogroup A, language, time, and direction....."
- Next in thread: Lee Olsen: "Re: OT: Malhi, Eshleman, haplogroup A, language, time, and direction....."
- Reply: Lee Olsen: "Re: OT: Malhi, Eshleman, haplogroup A, language, time, and direction....."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 03:11:13 GMT
Lee,
While I'm getting up to speed on the two articles you mentioned, have
you read the following?
American Indian mtDNA and Y Chromosome Genetic Data: A Comprehensive
Report of their Use in Migration and Other Anthropological Studies by
Peter N. Jones (July 31, 2004)
It seems like a fairly comprehensive summary.
Gisele
On 23 Mar 2005 21:34:20 -0800, "Lee Olsen" <paleocity@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>G Horvat wrote:
>> On 23 Mar 2005 17:14:34 -0800, "Lee Olsen" <paleocity@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >G Horvat wrote:
>> >> Lee,
>> >> Another way of putting it is that haplogroup A is found in its
>> >> highest frequencies where other New World haplogroups are absent.
>Both of
>> >> these articles, which I don't think I've read yet, relate to
>> >> northwestern and western North America. Haplogroup A is also
>found
>> >>in fairly healthy frequencies such as 30% in South American
>populations
>> >
>> >Would these be considered 'coastal' people or 'inland' people? I
>don't
>> >mean exactly, but more or less in a broad sense.
>>
>> I thought that was what you were getting at but was not sure.
>
>Actually that is the conclusion of the authors, at least in the
>Northwest down to California.
>
>>
>> It would be easier to describe the populations which lack this
>> haplogroup than the ones which have it. It is absent in the ancient
>> Fuegian samples
>
>
>Sounds like the A group fizzled somewhere on its journey down the
>coast.
>
>> and is found in lower than average frequencies in
>> Chile and Argentina and in the American SW where the frequency was
>> determined to be 0% for many populations.
>
>The paper (Malhi) cites Lorenz and Smith, and Stone and Stoneking
>saying Haida "colonized the Americas at the same time as populations
>in the Amerindian group,
>but isolation and genetic drift caused the pattern of reduced diversity
>within them."
>
>> Other than that, I think
>> the haplogroup is fairly ubiquitous in the New World which is why its
>> source should be fairly important but, hey, you do know that the
>> author of one of those articles is a sci.anthropology.paleo
>> contributor.
>>
>> I consider haplogroup B to be more coastal in both the Old World and
>> New but I am certainly no expert on differentiating between the two.
>> The Asian B *sub-group* which is closest to Native American B is
>found
>> in Japan, Taiwan, etc. all the way down to Indonesia (about the
>> furthest point south that I'm aware of) and in China, where much
>mtDNA
>> information is presently available, the provinces which had the
>> highest frequencies were all adjacent to the Yangztee River with the
>> exception of Guangdong (Canton in English, I'm told).
>
>Well, the group the authors are using to demonstrate a "prehistoric
>intrusion" on the NW coast is haplogroup A.
>
>>
>> Gisele
- Previous message: Tedd Jacobs: "Re: A new early Holocene human skeleton from Brazil"
- In reply to: Lee Olsen: "Re: OT: Malhi, Eshleman, haplogroup A, language, time, and direction....."
- Next in thread: Lee Olsen: "Re: OT: Malhi, Eshleman, haplogroup A, language, time, and direction....."
- Reply: Lee Olsen: "Re: OT: Malhi, Eshleman, haplogroup A, language, time, and direction....."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|