Re: floresiensis Fossils Damaged
From: Su Solomon (so_at_email.net)
Date: 03/26/05
- Next message: G Horvat: "Re: OT: Malhi, Eshleman, haplogroup A, language, time, and direction....."
- Previous message: Michael Clark: "Re: floresiensis Fossils Damaged"
- In reply to: John B.: "Re: floresiensis Fossils Damaged"
- Next in thread: John B.: "Re: floresiensis Fossils Damaged"
- Reply: John B.: "Re: floresiensis Fossils Damaged"
- Reply: mark_at_spiznet.com: "Re: floresiensis Fossils Damaged"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 17:19:50 +1100
John B. wrote:
>
> I have read that since these fossils were found "wet" in a thick paste like
> consistency, even cured they remained to fragile to ever have been
> physically molded. That is why there were plans to use CT scans to create
> digital images instead.
>
> I am absolutely apalled that this old man and his selfish ego has
> irreparably damaged this unique cultural treasure. Jacobs' should be ashamed
> at the disgrace he has brought to himself, and his legacy should be one of
> ignomy.
>
> John
I am absolutely appalled that you can make such scurrilous claims
without a whit of evidence.
- Next message: G Horvat: "Re: OT: Malhi, Eshleman, haplogroup A, language, time, and direction....."
- Previous message: Michael Clark: "Re: floresiensis Fossils Damaged"
- In reply to: John B.: "Re: floresiensis Fossils Damaged"
- Next in thread: John B.: "Re: floresiensis Fossils Damaged"
- Reply: John B.: "Re: floresiensis Fossils Damaged"
- Reply: mark_at_spiznet.com: "Re: floresiensis Fossils Damaged"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|