Re: human infants swim after 3 minutes, but run after 3 years. (Re: endurance running?
From: Marc Verhaegen (fa204466_at_skynet.be)
Date: 03/28/05
- Next message: Algis Kuliukas: "Re: New Ethiopian Find - Oldest Biped At 3.8-4 mya"
- Previous message: Marc Verhaegen: "Re: opening oysters with stone tools?"
- In reply to: Marc Verhaegen: "Re: human infants swim after 3 minutes, but run after 3 years. (Re: endurance running?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 10:04:53 +0200
Just found this
http://www.infantswim.com/gallery/gallery_az1.htm
It's incredible that people who see these photos keep claiming that our
ancestors could not have been littoral.
--Marc
________
"Marc Verhaegen" <fa204466@skynet.be> wrote in message
news:4240b03f$0$20681$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be...
> "mikelist" <mutterer@notime> wrote in message
> news:42405b4c$1_3@newspeer2.tds.net...
>
>>>>>Note that an older chimpanzee was also tested and, just like older
>>>>>human infants, was inactive when placed in the water. Note too that
>>>>>this study found that "at no time did any baby show himself capable of
>>>>>raising his head above the water level for the purpose of breathing".
>
>> I would suggest that you make too much of 'capable of raising his head
>> above the water level for the purpose of breathing'. It's well known that
>> newborn humans need to have their head and neck supported for some period
>> of time, and I rather more than suspect you already knew that. There
>> exists a much easier method of clearing the surface for breathing, so no
>> reason to raise its head exists. Capable of surviving in water is not
>> swimming for swimming for locomotion or utilitarian travel, but it could
>> have served to preserve a baby that had been dislodged from its mother's
>> grasp in ages past,(perhaps for a significant period of time waist deep
>> water was the safest place for humans to give birth). It is a feat that
>> most primate newborns would fail at. I'm not sure how much swimming
>> babies really do to prove any aspect of AAT, but they certainly don't
>> contradict it.
>
> :-) Well-said, Mike. Incredible that they're so closed-minded that they
> don't even see the possibility.
>
> --Marc
>
- Next message: Algis Kuliukas: "Re: New Ethiopian Find - Oldest Biped At 3.8-4 mya"
- Previous message: Marc Verhaegen: "Re: opening oysters with stone tools?"
- In reply to: Marc Verhaegen: "Re: human infants swim after 3 minutes, but run after 3 years. (Re: endurance running?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|