Re: Radio: The Scars of Evolution (Aquatic Ape Theory)

Stacey Bender wrote:
> Paul Crowley wrote:
> > But essentially its problem was the complete
> > absence of any theme.
>
> Are you a story editor or something? This is a vague and odd
criticism
> at best.
>
> > So what _really_ is the AAH?
>
> Did you read any of the books mentioned?

Yea, it's best not to argue with Paul Crowley. From
time to time, his medication runs out and before he
can get a refill, he'll happen to walk by a computer
with usenet access. But his criticism is spot on --see
the recent twisted ball of yowling cats otherwise known
as the Verhaegen/Kuliukas spat. The wet apes are mildly
amusing in daylight since they pontificate endlessly
about what they know not. Their problem is that they
have a ham-fisted housewive's understanding of science
in general and biological evolution in particular. If you
want to strut around waving their little flag, be my guest.
I especially like the inference of yours that anyone
not tooting on the wet ape tin horn must not have read
any books. That's great. You'll make a fine addition
to their stalwart, dripping ranks.

---
Yada, yada, yada

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Gender and Bipedalism
    ... "Paul Crowley" wrote in message ... > are rakes of dangerous predators in tropical ... Yada, yada, yada. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Is Oreopithicus the Aquatic Ape Link?
    ... "Paul Crowley" wrote in message ... "No one reading these exchanges can have ... the slightest doubt as to wherethe truth lies." ... Yada, yada, yada. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)