Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.

"Algis Kuliukas" <algis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1115724144.883497.193020@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

>... I think his wingeing about how his wife - a very well respected
>anthropologist and one we can all admire

(What is "wingeing", Algis?)

Is Moore married to a very well respected anthropologist?? who might that
be? Then why does he write such informed irrelevancies? eg, why doesn't he
let his wife read what he has written before sending us his nonsense?? why
doesn't he even tell his wife where she can find find decent information on
AAT?? If his wife had serious critique on AAT, why didn't she give us her
arguments? Can't she tell us that for herself instead of letting her husband
produce "arguments" as relevant as those of creationists?? I'm very curious
to know why this very well respected anthropologist might think we're wrong
http://www.onelist.com/community/AAT


.

Relevant Pages