Re: Questions for Clark

"Jim McGinn" <jimmcginn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1116475822.885288.76510@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> mclark wrote:
>> Jim McGinn wrote:
>> > mclark wrote:
>> [...]
>> > >
>> > > That's right, I can't. I'd have to be able to find it first.
>> >
>> > It's right here in this NG. You've already seen it.
>>
>> I have? Can you point me to the message ID where
>> this seein' was alleged to have transpired? I'll
>> look myself but is there anything else you'd like
>> me to do for you while I'm holding your hand?
>
> <snip>
>
> You could tell us your hypothesis on hominid evolution?
> Or were you serious when you said you don't have any
> such hypothesis? Surely you recognize that hominids/
> humans evolved from a chimp-like creature? Don't you?
> Surely you recognize that humans are very different
> than chimps? Don't you? And surely you recognize that,
> therefore, the hominid/human lineage must have been under
> environmental conditions that were very different from
> those of the chimpanzee lineage? Don't you?
>
> So now you're telling me that you are a college educated/
> trained anthropologist and you have no opinion at all--no
> clue at all--about the conditional factors that started
> the hominid/human lineage down such a different path of
> natural selection?
>
> Do you not feel at least a little embarassed by this?

Gosh, Jimmy, I don't see any message ID here, either. I have
to say that I looked and looked, high and low, through glen
and dale for any sign of a "hypothesis" and could find nothing.
I did see alot of verbiage, most of which was ridiculed as vapid
and nonsensical, but nothing that one might term a "hypothesis".
I suspect it is because you don't actually have one. At some
point in the past, you had a web site, but then, through
carelessness or disinterest you stopped paying the bill and
your erstwhile ISP yanked it. You then decided to christen
the sum total of your contributions to SAP as your "hypothesis",
suggesting to me that "It's right here in this NG. You've already
seen it." I've already said what I've seen, it remains for you to
prove my assessment wrong --that JM is a blowhard gasbag
with more time than sense and a fondness for insulting the people
with whom he thinks he's debating. Am I wrong? You should really
think about producing here because I'm growing weary of this
classic McGinnian dodge and feint. IOW, Jimmy, you're teetering
on the edge of the piss pail. If you don't wanna play, you're going
for a swim.

Incidentally, I don't have a "hypothesis", as I've already explained.
Further, I think that I have already explained how I don't need one.
My mission is to poke holes in yours --a hypothesis that you've
claimed to be comprehensive, detailed, over-arching, and the final
solution to all the problems in PA. So let's see it, this "hypothesis"
of yours.

<Insert crickets here>

> Jim


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Questions for Clark
    ... > Gosh, Jimmy, I don't see any message ID here, either. ... the hominid/human lineage must have been under ... environmental conditions that were very different from ... And in all that time you managed to avoid ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Questions for Clark
    ... > Jim McGinn wrote: ... >> mclark wrote: ... the hominid/human lineage must have been under ... environmental conditions that were very different from ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Jasons Dilemma
    ... >> Jim McGinn wrote: ... delusional-schmuck, er uh, Jimmy. ... complete enough to dispute in full form or to really bother with at ... but the fractions that squeak through in your various diatribes ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
    ... >> Jim McGinn wrote: ... >>> Are you saying there's anything in these books that has direct bearing on ... >> were reading the book. ... skiing makes it look like you're a liar, Jimmy. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
    ... > Jim McGinn wrote: ... > skiing makes it look like you're a liar, Jimmy. ... If your question has no bearing on my hypothesis then why do you pose it? ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)