Re: Gould Evolution big book
- From: "mclark" <mclark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 00:04:31 GMT
<mark@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1117831953.953296.95990@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I hate to be the only publication of this theory, but here "it" is.
HAH! Got 'im! Thanks, Aquaman :()
[lunacy]
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Gould Evolution big book
- From: rmacfarl
- Re: Gould Evolution big book
- References:
- Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
- From: Algis Kuliukas
- Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
- From: JAE
- Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
- From: Algis Kuliukas
- Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
- From: JAE
- Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
- From: Algis Kuliukas
- Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
- From: Paul Crowley
- Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
- From: JAE
- Gould Evolution big book
- From: mark@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Gould Evolution big book
- From: JAE
- Re: Gould Evolution big book
- From: Rick Wagler
- Re: Gould Evolution big book
- From: Jim McGinn
- Re: Gould Evolution big book
- From: Su Solomon
- Re: Gould Evolution big book
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Gould Evolution big book
- From: mclark
- Re: Gould Evolution big book
- From: JAE
- Re: Gould Evolution big book
- From: mark@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
- Prev by Date: Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
- Next by Date: Re: Gould Evolution big book
- Previous by thread: Re: Gould Evolution big book
- Next by thread: Re: Gould Evolution big book
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|