Re: Gould Evolution big book
- From: "mclark" <mclark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 01:21:03 GMT
<mark@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1117831953.953296.95990@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I hate to be the only publication of this theory, but here "it" is.
Ya know, that would have been funny if it hadn't been
laughed at before. But good thing it's found. Now
whenever someone is bored to tears, they can beat
ol' Jimmy over the head with his "pesky hominids".
HAHAHA har har... Oops, I guess it's *still* funny.
[Classic Jim McGinn]
.
- References:
- Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
- From: Algis Kuliukas
- Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
- From: JAE
- Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
- From: Algis Kuliukas
- Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
- From: JAE
- Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
- From: Algis Kuliukas
- Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
- From: Paul Crowley
- Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
- From: JAE
- Gould Evolution big book
- From: mark@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Gould Evolution big book
- From: JAE
- Re: Gould Evolution big book
- From: Rick Wagler
- Re: Gould Evolution big book
- From: Jim McGinn
- Re: Gould Evolution big book
- From: Su Solomon
- Re: Gould Evolution big book
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Gould Evolution big book
- From: mclark
- Re: Gould Evolution big book
- From: JAE
- Re: Gould Evolution big book
- From: mark@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
- Prev by Date: Re: Gould Evolution big book
- Next by Date: Re: Gould Evolution big book
- Previous by thread: Re: Gould Evolution big book
- Next by thread: Re: Gould Evolution big book
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|