Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.





Paul Crowley wrote:
> "Algis Kuliukas" <algis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1118360457.790320.193990@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> > Well I think the reasons are not besides the point. The reasons *are*
> > the point. And, in my view, the reason the field is what you call
> > 'degenerate' are the same as the reason the AAH has been ignored for so
> > long: a lack of willingness to really understand any new idea from an
> > 'outsider',
>
> There is nothing special in that. It is an
> aspect of every discipline. In all genuine
> ones (say, maths, astronomy, physics)
> there will be bunches of freakish outsiders,
> often in organised groups, whose ideas
> are treated contemptuously by the
> professionals. The question is whether
> or not they deserve to be.

Fair point, and I agree.

> IMO, the AAT
> does deserve that treatment, but often for
> reasons that standard PA does not grasp
> or finds it hard to articulate. (The AAT
> shares most of the idiocy of standard PA,
> and both deserve contempt in that regard.
> For example, both ignore predation, and
> both seem incapable of realising that the
> species consists of more than adult males.)

See, I just can't see how you can think that. I think standard PA
models do those things, of course they do. Perhaps it's the wartime
Dartist vision you are thinking of but we have to accept that PA's
moved on a long time ago from that view. This is where I think people
like Marc Verhaegen makes his biggest mistake. He's still arguing with
people he thinks are Dartists.

The AAH's chief proponent, I might remind you, was a pioneer of the
role of women in human evolution and wrote a book called 'The Descent
of Women' and another called 'The Descent of the Child'.

Algis Kuliukas

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: kids and their furniture?
    ... I would always honor and respect any house rules I was ... standards that differed significantly from the range of behaviors ... I think it's pretty close to the legal 'reasonable person' standard. ... too much work to reason one's way through every single ...
    (misc.kids)
  • Re: I dont get how the computer arrives at 2^31
    ... > Standard isn't always as careful with the language it uses. ... something that will make its functionality "equivalent" to fprintf(). ... function that created the va_list value passed to vfprintf(). ... The reason is that, unless ...
    (comp.std.c)
  • Re: How do you imagine future Common Lisp standard ?
    ... Scheme doesn't focus on good macro ... Goodness and Badness must be evaluated in a particular design-space ... It's fortunate that this can be done without change to the standard, ... There's no reason to define the old language away, ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: Understanding # and function variables
    ... That's the reason for my statement that I don't care whether a ... >>change is standard compliant or not. ... >>substantial revision of ANSI Common Lisp and would provide equally ... I will find out about an already existing language that is strictly ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: the media doesnt take christianity seriously
    ... >>the government imprison anyone or release anyone they wish for any reason ... >>Why do you believe no absolute standard of morality exists? ... > Our need to survive living with each other. ... That's just the opinion ...
    (rec.arts.tv)

Quantcast