Re: Doesn't ANYONE have anything new to say?

rmacfarl wrote: 
Man, SAP is desperate at the minute. Not only is the Google version
flooded by William Conrad's talking horse, but all the loons are here
in force - Jimmy, Algie, Marcie, Madam Ross & Mr Howard. Even Mario and
Andrew Nowitski.

I posted something about a pre-Clovis site a week ago, and barely a
peep was heard. Surely it could have stirred up Phil & Olsen - maybe
even dragged MIB out of the woodwork. But no - Olsen's too busy
matching wits with the witless on the squishy thread.

Even on Palanth, & Palanthsci, & Paleoanthro, the best discussion is
being driven by <gasp> Richard Parker aka coconut boy (to whom due
credit).

So doesn't ANYONE have something new to raise the level of
discussion???

Ross Macfarlane


I had this long diatribe about the June 11 article in Science News about sexual dimorphism in A. afarensis and how Owen Lovejoy is the smartest person in the field because he said what I've been saying for years that the dimorphism is wildly over estimated in a self fulfilling prophecy of assuming big bones are male and small bones female. But the damn computer crashed and I lost it all and I don't have the energy to try to re-create it.

Lorenzo L. Love
http://home.thegrid.net/~lllove

"It is not Microsoft's monopoly that I object to, it is the mediocrity of their products."
Larry Ellison, CEO of Oracle

.

Quantcast