sci.anthropology.paleo

• Thread Index

• Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
  • From: spiznet
• Re: New animal species evolving from a hybrid discovered in North America
  • From: spiznet
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: mclark
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
  • From: mclark
• Re: Ah, it was bison hair Re: "Bigfoot" Hair To Be Tested
  • From: Rich Travsky
• Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
  • From: richardparker01
• Re: Only Idiots Believe AAT
  • From: John
• Re: Only Idiots Believe AAT
  • From: John
• Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: eating sharks EGGS by baboons
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: eating sharks EGGS by baboons
  • From: Rich Travsky
• Re: eating sharks EGGS by baboons
  • From: Rich Travsky
• Re: eating sharks EGGS by baboons
  • From: Rich Travsky
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: JAE
• Re: eating sharks EGGS by baboons
  • From: Rich Travsky
• Re: baboons eating sharks' eggs
  • From: Rich Travsky
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: skinny runners
  • From: Rich Travsky
• Re: skinny runners
  • From: Rich Travsky
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: Rich Travsky
• Re: Re:eating sharks EGGS by baboons
  • From: Mario Petrinovich
• Re: Re:eating sharks EGGS by baboons
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: eating sharks EGGS by baboons
  • From: Mario Petrinovich
• Re: eating sharks EGGS by baboons
  • From: spiznet
• Re: Re:eating sharks EGGS by baboons
  • From: Mario Petrinovich
• Re: Final Aquatic of the Solution Question
  • From: spiznet
• Re: New animal species evolving from a hybrid discovered in North America
  • From: firstjois
• Re:eating sharks EGGS by baboons
  • From: spiznet
• Re: Maskitter Critters [Re: Sweating hominids]
  • From: mclark
• Re: Maskitter Critters [Re: Sweating hominids]
  • From: richardparker01
• Re: baboons eating sharks
  • From: Mario Petrinovich
• reconstructing evol.histories : the comparative & analytical method
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• New animal species evolving from a hybrid discovered in North America
  • From: rmacfarl
• dry ape talk (Re: Only Idiots Believe AAT
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: AAT is based on comparative evidence & is nowhere contradicted by the fossil evidence (Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: AAT is based on comparative evidence & is nowhere contradicted by the fossil evidence (Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Rick Wagler
• Re: Only Idiots Believe AAT
  • From: Rick Wagler
• Re: Ah, it was bison hair Re: "Bigfoot" Hair To Be Tested
  • From: Rick Wagler
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: firstjois
• Re: Ah, it was bison hair Re: "Bigfoot" Hair To Be Tested
  • From: firstjois
• Re: Ah, it was bison hair Re: "Bigfoot" Hair To Be Tested
  • From: firstjois
• Re: Only Idiots Believe AAT
  • From: firstjois
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• AAT is based on comparative evidence & is nowhere contradicted by the fossil evidence (Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: Ah, it was bison hair Re: "Bigfoot" Hair To Be Tested
  • From: deowll
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: Only Idiots Believe AAT
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• baboons eating sharks
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: Only Idiots Believe AAT
  • From: John
• Re: Ah, it was bison hair Re: "Bigfoot" Hair To Be Tested
  • From: Whitedog
• Ah, it was bison hair Re: "Bigfoot" Hair To Be Tested
  • From: Rich Travsky
• Only Idiots Believe AAT
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: JAE
• Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
  • From: Lee Olsen
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Lee Olsen
• dry apers... (Re: AAH definition is in favor of wife beating
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: rmacfarl
• [Fwd: Wealth and poverty are much older than civilization, archaeologists find]
  • From: Roger Bagula
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: rmacfarl
• Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: Maskitter Critters [Re: Sweating hominids]
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Whitedog
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Whitedog
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Maskitter Critters [Re: Sweating hominids]
  • From: Philip Deitiker
• Re: BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Ancient phallus unearthed in cave
  • From: pete
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: spiznet
• Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
  • From: spiznet
• Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
  • From: JAE
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
  • From: mclark
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: JAE
• Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
  • From: richardparker01
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: richardparker01
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: mclark
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: richardparker01
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: richardparker01
• Re: Girls night out!?!
  • From: richardparker01
• Re: Final Question of the Aquatic Solution (10%)
  • From: mclark
• Re: In the Wake of the Jomon
  • From: richardparker01
• Re: Final Question of the Aquatic Solution (10%)
  • From: spiznet
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Whitedog
• Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
  • From: Andrew Nowicki
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: rmacfarl
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: rmacfarl
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: rmacfarl
• Re: In the Wake of the Jomon
  • From: rmacfarl
• Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
  • From: mclark
• Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: Girls night out!?!
  • From: mclark
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: Andrew Nowicki
• Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
  • From: Andrew Nowicki
• Girls night out!?!
  • From: spiznet
• Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• "Bigfoot" Hair To Be Tested
  • From: Rich Travsky
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: mclark
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: mclark
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Paul Crowley
• New and Old Topics
  • From: richardparker01
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: JAE
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: richardparker01
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: richardparker01
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: richardparker01
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: In the Wake of the Jomon
  • From: richardparker01
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: JAE
• Re: In the Wake of the Jomon
  • From: G Horvat
• BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Ancient phallus unearthed in cave
  • From: Roger Bagula
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• In the Wake of the Jomon
  • From: richardparker01
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: mclark
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: mclark
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: spiznet
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: rmacfarl
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
  • From: rmacfarl
• Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
  • From: spiznet
• load-carrying? (Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
  • From: Andrew Nowicki
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Whitedog
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: firstjois
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: firstjois
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Su Solomon
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Whitedog
• Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
  • From: Andrew Nowicki
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: mclark
• Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
  • From: Su Solomon
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Su Solomon
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: mclark
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Su Solomon
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Su Solomon
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Su Solomon
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Su Solomon
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Su Solomon
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: richardparker01
• Re: BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Robotics show Lucy walked upright]
  • From: richardparker01
• Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
  • From: richardparker01
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: firstjois
• Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: AAH definition is in favor of wife beating
  • From: firstjois
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
  • From: firstjois
• Re: BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Robotics show Lucy walked upright]
  • From: mclark
• Re: BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Robotics show Lucy walked upright]
  • From: richardparker01
• Re: skinny runners
  • From: richardparker01
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: richardparker01
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: richardparker01
• Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
  • From: richardparker01
• Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
  • From: rmacfarl
• Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Intellectual Stealth
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Rick Wagler
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
  • From: firstjois
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Rick Wagler
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Whitedog
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Whitedog
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: JAE
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
  • From: Andrew Nowicki
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
  • From: spiznet
• Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
  • From: mclark
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Whitedog
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Whitedog
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Whitedog
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Whitedog
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Whitedog
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Whitedog
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Whitedog
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Whitedog
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: Andrew Nowicki
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Andrew Nowicki
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Looking for a quote
  • From: Elliot Richmond
• Re: "Lalala" PAs (Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: spiznet
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: JAE
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Whitedog
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: mclark
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: mclark
• tears (Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• "Lalala" PAs (Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: rmacfarl
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: rmacfarl
• Re: erectus (or their immediate ancestors) were parttime divers? (Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: skinny runners
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: erectus (or their immediate ancestors) were parttime divers? (Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: erectus (or their immediate ancestors) were parttime divers? (Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: mclark
• Re: valgus knee
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Whitedog
• Re: BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Robotics show Lucy walked upright]
  • From: Lorenzo L. Love
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Su Solomon
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Su Solomon
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Su Solomon
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: JAE
• Re: erectus (or their immediate ancestors) were parttime divers? (Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Robotics show Lucy walked upright]
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: spiznet
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Whitedog
• Re: erectus (or their immediate ancestors) were parttime divers? (Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Gerrit Hanenburg
• Re: Back-migrations to Asia (attention: Gisele)
  • From: Dar Habel
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: erectus (or their immediate ancestors) were parttime divers? (Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: JAE
• Re: skinny runners
  • From: Rich Travsky
• Re: erectus (or their immediate ancestors) were parttime divers? (Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Rich Travsky
• Re: erectus (or their immediate ancestors) were parttime divers? (Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Rich Travsky
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Lee Olsen
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Philip Deitiker
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Philip Deitiker
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Lee Olsen
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: JAE
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: valgus knee
  • From: deowll
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: deowll
• OT Probably OT "Developmental Systems Theory" school
  • From: firstjois
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: JAE
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: JAE
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: mclark
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: mclark
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Lorenzo L. Love
• Family Tree
  • From: firstjois
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: forward: Graphical modeling of extinct lifeforms with Mathematica
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: valgus knee
  • From: Mario Petrinovich
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Mario Petrinovich
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Mario Petrinovich
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: JAE
• origins of bipedalism (Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: skinny runners
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: mclark
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: mclark
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: deowll
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: JAE
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: mclark
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Mario Petrinovich
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: JAE
• BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Robotics show Lucy walked upright]
  • From: Roger Bagula
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: spiznet
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: firstjois
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: JAE
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: spiznet
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: spiznet
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: P.Desenex
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: skinny runners
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: skinny runners
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: Australia - Fire From Humans Caused Extinctions
  • From: rmacfarl
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: deowll
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Lee Olsen
• Re: erectus (or their immediate ancestors) were parttime divers? (Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Gerrit Hanenburg
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Su Solomon
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: spiznet
• Re: Australia - Fire From Humans Caused Extinctions
  • From: Su Solomon
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: JAE
• Re: skinny runners
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Su Solomon
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Su Solomon
• Re: Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: P.Desenex
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: erectus (or their immediate ancestors) were parttime divers? (Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: AAH is rejectable
  • From: rmacfarl
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: erectus (or their immediate ancestors) were parttime divers? (Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: Back-migrations to Asia (attention: Gisele)
  • From: deowll
• skinny runners
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• valgus knee
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: erectus (or their immediate ancestors) were parttime divers? (Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: Back-migrations to Asia (attention: Gisele)
  • From: Dar Habel
• Re: Mexican Laetoli?
  • From: richardparker01
• Re: Back-migrations to Asia (attention: Gisele)
  • From: richardparker01
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Lorenzo L. Love
• Re: Human culture changes 40-30ky ago?
  • From: richardparker01
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Rick Wagler
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: JAE
• Re: Human culture changes 40-30ky ago?
  • From: spiznet
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: spiznet
• Re: Human culture changes 40-30ky ago?
  • From: deowll
• Re: Back-migrations to Asia (attention: Gisele)
  • From: deowll
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: Human culture changes 40-30ky ago?
  • From: richardparker01
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: P.Desenex
• Re: Australia - Fire From Humans Caused Extinctions
  • From: rmacfarl
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: JAE
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: JAE
• Re: Australia - Fire From Humans Caused Extinctions
  • From: spiznet
• Re: AAH definition is rejectable
  • From: spiznet
• Re: fire apes
  • From: Mario Petrinovich
• Re: fire apes
  • From: Andrew Nowicki
• Re: Australia - Fire From Humans Caused Extinctions
  • From: Philip Deitiker
• Re: Back-migrations to Asia (attention: Gisele)
  • From: JAE
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: JAE
• Re: fire apes
  • From: Mario Petrinovich
• Re: Human culture changes 40-30ky ago?
  • From: John Roth
• Re: fire apes
  • From: Andrew Nowicki
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Su Solomon
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Andrew Nowicki
• Re: fire apes
  • From: Mario Petrinovich
• Re: Australia - Fire From Humans Caused Extinctions
  • From: Su Solomon
• Re: fire apes
  • From: Mario Petrinovich
• Re: fire apes
  • From: Mario Petrinovich
• Re: fire apes
  • From: Andrew Nowicki
• Re: fire apes
  • From: Andrew Nowicki
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: erectus (or their immediate ancestors) were parttime divers? (Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Rick Wagler
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• erectus (or their immediate ancestors) were parttime divers? (Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: Mexican Laetoli?
  • From: bob_keeter
• Re: Back-migrations to Asia (attention: Gisele)
  • From: Dar Habel
• Communal origins of hominid throwing proficiency
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: Human culture changes 40-30ky ago?
  • From: deowll
• Re: Back-migrations to Asia (attention: Gisele)
  • From: deowll
• Re: fire apes
  • From: spiznet
• Re: Human culture changes 40-30ky ago?
  • From: John Roth
• Re: Back-migrations to Asia (attention: Gisele)
  • From: G Horvat
• Re: Back-migrations to Asia (attention: Gisele)
  • From: JAE
• Re: GOGOLOGY THEORIES -- Possible, Unprobable & Impossible
  • From: Aidan Karley
• Re: Coastal diasporae
  • From: spiznet
• Re: Back-migrations to Asia (attention: Gisele)
  • From: Dar Habel
• Re: Back-migrations to Asia (attention: Gisele)
  • From: Dar Habel
• Coastal diasporae
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: Australia - Fire From Humans Caused Extinctions
  • From: deowll
• Re: Mexican Laetoli?
  • From: deowll
• Re: Human culture changes 40-30ky ago?
  • From: deowll
• Re: Australia - Fire From Humans Caused Extinctions
  • From: spiznet
• Re: Sleeping on the ground
  • From: Jim McGinn
• climate backwards
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: Back-migrations to Asia (attention: Gisele)
  • From: Lee Olsen
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: spiznet
• Re: Back-migrations to Asia (attention: Gisele)
  • From: pete
• Re: Back-migrations to Asia (attention: Gisele)
  • From: Lee Olsen
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Lee Olsen
• Re: Back-migrations to Asia (attention: Gisele)
  • From: G Horvat
• Re: Back-migrations to Asia (attention: Gisele)
  • From: JAE
• forward: Graphical modeling of extinct lifeforms with Mathematica
  • From: Roger Bagula
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: Australia - Fire From Humans Caused Extinctions
  • From: rmacfarl
• Re: Australia - Fire From Humans Caused Extinctions
  • From: rmacfarl
• Re: Back-migrations to Asia (attention: Gisele)
  • From: Lee Olsen
• Re: Back-migrations to Asia (attention: Gisele)
  • From: G Horvat
• Re: Mexican Laetoli?
  • From: bob_keeter
• Re: Human culture changes 40-30ky ago?
  • From: John Roth
• Re: Human culture changes 40-30ky ago?
  • From: John Roth
• Re: Nat Geo special - Modern Humans at 70 K
  • From: deowll
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: Human culture changes 40-30ky ago?
  • From: Darwin
• Re: Human culture changes 40-30ky ago?
  • From: firstjois
• Re: Human culture changes 40-30ky ago?
  • From: richardparker01
• Re: Australia - Fire From Humans Caused Extinctions
  • From: richardparker01
• Re: Back-migrations to Asia (attention: Gisele)
  • From: Lee Olsen
• Re: Australia - Fire From Humans Caused Extinctions
  • From: Su Solomon
• Re: Human culture changes 40-30ky ago?
  • From: John Roth
• Re: Human culture changes 40-30ky ago?
  • From: H. E. Taylor
• Re: Human culture changes 40-30ky ago?
  • From: rmacfarl
• Re: Hi-Tech Stone Age Site Found
  • From: deowll
• Re: Human culture changes 40-30ky ago?
  • From: pete
• Re: Mexican Laetoli?
  • From: deowll
• Re: Sleeping on the ground
  • From: P.Desenex
• Re: Sleeping on the ground
  • From: spiznet
• Human culture changes 40-30ky ago?
  • From: Paul Ciszek
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: Nat Geo special - Modern Humans at 70 K
  • From: firstjois
• Re: Mexican Laetoli?
  • From: bob_keeter
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: Sleeping on the ground
  • From: Lorenzo L. Love
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: Sleeping on the ground
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: fire apes
  • From: Mario Petrinovich
• Re: Sleeping on the ground
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: Sleeping on the ground
  • From: Lorenzo L. Love
• Re: Sleeping on the ground
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: Sleeping on the ground
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: Mexican Laetoli?
  • From: Dar Habel
• Re: 14000BC ?
  • From: firstjois
• Re: Sleeping on the ground
  • From: Lorenzo L. Love
• Re: Mexican Laetoli?
  • From: bob_keeter
• Re: Alex The Parrot In The News: Understands "numerical concept akin to zero"
  • From: mclark
• Re: Alex The Parrot In The News: Understands "numerical concept akin to zero"
  • From: spiznet
• Re: Sleeping on the ground
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Alex The Parrot In The News: Understands "numerical concept akin to zero"
  • From: Rich Travsky
• Re: Sleeping on the ground
  • From: Andrew Nowicki
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: Andrew Nowicki
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: Whitedog
• Sleeping on the ground
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: human diving bradycardia
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: Australia - Fire From Humans Caused Extinctions
  • From: rmacfarl
• Re: Mexican Laetoli?
  • From: rmacfarl
• Re: human diving bradycardia
  • From: r norman
• Re: Mexican Laetoli?
  • From: Dar Habel
• Re: Mexican Laetoli?
  • From: richardparker01
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: Mexican Laetoli?
  • From: Dar Habel
• vet students
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: human diving bradycardia
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: Lorenzo L. Love
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: Rick Wagler
• Re: Mexican Laetoli?
  • From: richardparker01
• Hall of Ma'at Heb Sed Celebration
  • From: Doug Weller
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: fire apes
  • From: spiznet
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: JAE
• Re: fire apes
  • From: mclark
• Re: fire apes
  • From: spiznet
• Re: Australia - Fire From Humans Caused Extinctions
  • From: Su Solomon
• Re: Identical Twins and Genetic Changes Over Time.
  • From: firstjois
• Re: 14000BC ?
  • From: firstjois
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: arne97
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: mclark
• fire apes
  • From: Andrew Nowicki
• Re: Primitive hafting technology - any ideas?
  • From: Andrew Nowicki
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: JAE
• Monsoon/mosaic
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Rick Wagler
• Re: Mexican Laetoli?
  • From: Dar Habel
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Lee Olsen
• Re: Mexican Laetoli?
  • From: bob_keeter
• Re: Identical Twins and Genetic Changes Over Time.
  • From: rmacfarl
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: Australia - Fire From Humans Caused Extinctions
  • From: rmacfarl
• Re: Mexican Laetoli?
  • From: Dar Habel
• Re: Mexican Laetoli?
  • From: bob_keeter
• Re: Mexican Laetoli?
  • From: Rich Travsky
• Re: human diving bradycardia
  • From: r norman
• Re: human diving bradycardia
  • From: r norman
• Re: human diving bradycardia
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: human diving bradycardia
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: Mexican Laetoli?
  • From: Dar Habel
• Re: Mexican Laetoli?
  • From: Dar Habel
• Re: Mexican Laetoli?
  • From: arne97
• Mexican Laetoli?
  • From: bob_keeter
• Re: Ovulating women favour dominant men's smell
  • From: mclark
• Re: Primitive hafting technology - any ideas?
  • From: bob_keeter
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: mclark
• Re: Hi-Tech Stone Age Site Found
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: Ovulating women favour dominant men's smell
  • From: spiznet
• Re: Australia - Fire From Humans Caused Extinctions
  • From: Philip Deitiker
• Re: Primitive hafting technology - any ideas?
  • From: puttster
• Re: Australia - Fire From Humans Caused Extinctions
  • From: Dar Habel
• Ovulating women favour dominant men's smell
  • From: Rich Travsky
• Australia - Fire From Humans Caused Extinctions
  • From: Rich Travsky
• Re: human diving bradycardia
  • From: spiznet
• Re: human diving bradycardia
  • From: r norman
• uninformed savanna believer (Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• human diving bradycardia
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: spiznet
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Lee Olsen
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: Rock Art -Third try
  • From: firstjois
• Re: Rock Art
  • From: firstjois
• Re: early Americans followed the sea
  • From: firstjois
• Rock Art
  • From: firstjois
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: JAE
• Re: infections and testosterone
  • From: firstjois
• Re: early Americans followed the sea
  • From: spiznet
• Re: early Americans followed the sea
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: Andrew Nowicki
• Re: infections and testosterone
  • From: Lorenzo L. Love
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: early Americans followed the sea
  • From: spiznet
• Re: early Americans followed the sea
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: early Americans followed the sea
  • From: Pauline M Ross
• Re: Nat Geo special - Modern Humans at 70 K
  • From: ratecase
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: Andrew Nowicki
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: spiznet
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: Andrew Nowicki
• Re: Nat Geo special - Modern Humans at 70 K
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: infections and testosterone
  • From: Whitedog
• Re: infections and testosterone
  • From: pete
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: JAE
• Re: Primitive hafting technology - any ideas?
  • From: bob_keeter
• Re: Hi-Tech Stone Age Site Found
  • From: bob_keeter
• Neanderthal Genome May Be Reconstructed
  • From: Rich Travsky
• Asia cradle of anthropoids?
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: spiznet
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: spiznet
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: Rick Wagler
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: Explanatory Shortfalls of Conventional Vagueness
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: Nat Geo special - Modern Humans at 70 K
  • From: spiznet
• Re: early Americans followed the sea
  • From: richardparker01
• Re: Nat Geo special - Modern Humans at 70 K
  • From: ratecase
• Re: early Americans followed the sea
  • From: Doug Weller
• Re: Explanatory Shortfalls of Conventional Vagueness
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: infections and testosterone
  • From: Whitedog
• Kennewick To Finally Be Studied
  • From: Rich Travsky
• Re: infections and testosterone
  • From: firstjois
• Re: infections and testosterone
  • From: pete
• Re: early Americans followed the sea
  • From: Lorenzo L. Love
• Re: Identical Twins and Genetic Changes Over Time.
  • From: firstjois
• Re: early Americans followed the sea
  • From: Daryl Krupa
• Re: early Americans followed the sea
  • From: JAE
• Re: early Americans followed the sea
  • From: deowll
• Re: early Americans followed the sea
  • From: deowll
• Re: Identical Twins and Genetic Changes Over Time.
  • From: deowll
• Re: Primitive hafting technology - any ideas?
  • From: deowll
• Re: Explanatory Shortfalls of Conventional Vagueness
  • From: deowll
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: deowll
• Re: Hi-Tech Stone Age Site Found
  • From: deowll
• Re: Hi-Tech Stone Age Site Found
  • From: deowll
• Re: Nat Geo special - Modern Humans at 70 K
  • From: deowll
• Re: early Americans followed the sea
  • From: JAE
• Re: early Americans followed the sea
  • From: Lorenzo L. Love
• Re: early Americans followed the sea
  • From: JAE
• Re: early Americans followed the sea
  • From: Lorenzo L. Love
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Lee Olsen
• Re: early Americans followed the sea
  • From: JAE
• Re: early Americans followed the sea
  • From: John Roth
• Re: early Americans followed the sea
  • From: JAE
• early Americans followed the sea
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: Identical Twins and Genetic Changes Over Time.
  • From: rmacfarl
• Re: Identical Twins and Genetic Changes Over Time.
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Identical Twins and Genetic Changes Over Time.
  • From: firstjois
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: Andrew Nowicki
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: Andrew Nowicki
• Re: Primitive hafting technology - any ideas?
  • From: Andrew Nowicki
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Rick Wagler
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: spiznet
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: JAE
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Rick Wagler
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: JAE
• Re: Primitive hafting technology - any ideas?
  • From: bob_keeter
• Re: Hi-Tech Stone Age Site Found
  • From: bob_keeter
• Re: Nat Geo special - Modern Humans at 70 K
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: Hi-Tech Stone Age Site Found
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: shallow littoral paludal savanna
  • From: spiznet
• Explanatory Shortfalls of Conventional Vagueness
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: spiznet
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: deowll
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: deowll
• Re: Hi-Tech Stone Age Site Found
  • From: deowll
• Re: Nat Geo special - Modern Humans at 70 K
  • From: deowll
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: NYT Article, females are studious earlier, while the males goof around.
  • From: firstjois
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: spiznet
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: Marc Verhaegen
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: Andrew Nowicki
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: spiznet
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: Andrew Nowicki
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: spiznet
• Re: Sweating hominids
  • From: Andrew Nowicki
• Re: NYT Article, females are studious earlier, while the males goof around.
  • From: John Roth
• Re: Hi-Tech Stone Age Site Found
  • From: bob_keeter
• Re: Hi-Tech Stone Age Site Found
  • From: bob_keeter
• Re: Nat Geo special - Modern Humans at 70 K
  • From: Dar Habel
• Hi-Tech Stone Age Site Found
  • From: rmacfarl
• Re: NYT Article, females are studious earlier, while the males goof around.
  • From: rmacfarl
• NYT Article, females are studious earlier, while the males goof around.
  • From: Philip Deitiker
• Re: Nat Geo special - Modern Humans at 70 K
  • From: deowll
• Sweating hominids
  • From: Andrew Nowicki
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: mclark
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: JAE
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: spiznet
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: JAE
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Lee Olsen
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: mclark
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: Nat Geo special - Modern Humans at 70 K
  • From: Dar Habel
• Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
  • From: Algis Kuliukas
• Re: Nat Geo special - Modern Humans at 70 K
  • From: Dar Habel
• Re: Nat Geo special - Modern Humans at 70 K
  • From: Ralph E. Kelley
• Re: McGinn quits!
  • From: spiznet
• Re: Nat Geo special - Modern Humans at 70 K
  • From: deowll
• Re: Nat Geo special - Modern Humans at 70 K
  • From: deowll
• Re: Primitive hafting technology - any ideas?
  • From: deowll
• Re: Faithful Ancestors was Re: Doesn't ANYONE have anything new to say?
  • From: deowll
• Re: Faithful Ancestors was Re: Doesn't ANYONE have anything new to say?
  • From: deowll
• Re: Human territoriality [was A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.]
  • From: deowll

• Windows
• Science
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint